Sergey Kovalev vs Dmitry Bivol

Post Reply
EdwardRevolver1993
Welterweight
Posts: 782
Joined: 11 Apr 2016, 08:09

Sergey Kovalev vs Dmitry Bivol

Post by EdwardRevolver1993 »

This fight was discussed in 2018 and most likely would've happened, if Kovalev wouldn't have lost to Eleider Alvarez. However, at that point Kovalev was already on the slide.

Best version of Kovalev versus Best version of Bivol, though? Man, that would've been an intriguing one.

So, Koalev that unified titles against Hopkins VS. Bivol, who's now coming into undisputed clash vs Beterbiev.

How this fight would've unfolded?
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6060
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Dmitry Bivol

Post by goose 5 »

Bivol on points.
Vlad
Bantamweight
Posts: 1626
Joined: 15 Feb 2022, 02:15

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Dmitry Bivol

Post by Vlad »

Bivol by close decision.
scorpio83
Middleweight
Posts: 4592
Joined: 18 Aug 2013, 06:01

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Dmitry Bivol

Post by scorpio83 »

Either one would take a decision in a classic matchup.
EdwardRevolver1993
Welterweight
Posts: 782
Joined: 11 Apr 2016, 08:09

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Dmitry Bivol

Post by EdwardRevolver1993 »

Honestly, I'd take Kovalev (a 2013-2016 version). A lot of things being equal between the two, I think Kovalev's power (backed up by skills) would eventually become the deciding factor in this fight.

For those, who won't mind reading to the end, here's my more detailed breakdown/comparison of fighters' strength and weaknesses:

Jab - jab is a dominant weapon for both. Both have good jabs. Kovalev had a more powerful one, IMO.

Footwork - edge to Bivol. Kovalev had a pretty good footwork, but he tended to square his feet at times. And he was sometimes getting off-balanced as a result of it.

Defense - both aren't impossible to hit. Their defense is coming mainly from a good distance control and footwork. But if/when you succeed in getting into the range - you can hit them.

I'd say, Kovalev was getting hit cleanly a little bit more often.

Chin - Kovalev may have been more chinny. But I don't think Bivol had the power to get rid off the prime Kov. Meanwhile, Kovalev had the power to hurt Bivol. And we've seen that overhand right from Joe Smith had Bivol reeling (arguably, saved by the bell) and going into survival mode in the next round.

Kovalev had that quick, sneaky overhand right. If he could catch Bivol with it - who knows what happens?

Power - Kovalev. I think, most would be in agreement here. Bivol has some pop. Especially, when he sits down on his shots. But Kovalev could generate KO power without much effort. He could hurt you with the jab.

Handspeed - after watching through clips on both guys, it did look to me that Kovalev actually had faster hands.

Stamina - Bivol is pacing himself better. But there were several fights (Richards, Salamov) where I thought Bivol kind of slowed down by the late rounds and was doing a lot of coasting.

Ring IQ - I don't think anyone would've had obvious advantage here. Kovalev was a more emotional fighter, perhaps. But his smarts inside the ring are probably underrated today.

Both are great ring generals.

Inside game - prior to Canelo fight, I didn't think Bivol was an effective inside fighter. But he fought at close well against Alvarez. However, in the clinch, Kovalev was a more active and rougher of the two. He liked those coughing right hands behind the ear.
scorpio83
Middleweight
Posts: 4592
Joined: 18 Aug 2013, 06:01

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Dmitry Bivol

Post by scorpio83 »

EdwardRevolver1993 wrote: 27 Apr 2024, 12:35 Honestly, I'd take Kovalev (a 2013-2016 version). A lot of things being equal between the two, I think Kovalev's power (backed up by skills) would eventually become the deciding factor in this fight.

For those, who won't mind reading to the end, here's my more detailed breakdown/comparison of fighters' strength and weaknesses:

Jab - jab is a dominant weapon for both. Both have good jabs. Kovalev had a more powerful one, IMO.

Footwork - edge to Bivol. Kovalev had a pretty good footwork, but he tended to square his feet at times. And he was sometimes getting off-balanced as a result of it.

Defense - both aren't impossible to hit. Their defense is coming mainly from a good distance control and footwork. But if/when you succeed in getting into the range - you can hit them.

I'd say, Kovalev was getting hit cleanly a little bit more often.

Chin - Kovalev may have been more chinny. But I don't think Bivol had the power to get rid off the prime Kov. Meanwhile, Kovalev had the power to hurt Bivol. And we've seen that overhand right from Joe Smith had Bivol reeling (arguably, saved by the bell) and going into survival mode in the next round.

Kovalev had that quick, sneaky overhand right. If he could catch Bivol with it - who knows what happens?

Power - Kovalev. I think, most would be in agreement here. Bivol has some pop. Especially, when he sits down on his shots. But Kovalev could generate KO power without much effort. He could hurt you with the jab.

Handspeed - after watching through clips on both guys, it did look to me that Kovalev actually had faster hands.

Stamina - Bivol is pacing himself better. But there were several fights (Richards, Salamov) where I thought Bivol kind of slowed down by the late rounds and was doing a lot of coasting.

Ring IQ - I don't think anyone would've had obvious advantage here. Kovalev was a more emotional fighter, perhaps. But his smarts inside the ring are probably underrated today.

Both are great ring generals.

Inside game - prior to Canelo fight, I didn't think Bivol was an effective inside fighter. But he fought at close well against Alvarez. However, in the clinch, Kovalev was a more active and rougher of the two. He liked those coughing right hands behind the ear.
Great comparisons right there. :TU:
EdwardRevolver1993
Welterweight
Posts: 782
Joined: 11 Apr 2016, 08:09

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Dmitry Bivol

Post by EdwardRevolver1993 »

scorpio83 wrote: 27 Apr 2024, 12:50
EdwardRevolver1993 wrote: 27 Apr 2024, 12:35 Honestly, I'd take Kovalev (a 2013-2016 version). A lot of things being equal between the two, I think Kovalev's power (backed up by skills) would eventually become the deciding factor in this fight.

For those, who won't mind reading to the end, here's my more detailed breakdown/comparison of fighters' strength and weaknesses:

Jab - jab is a dominant weapon for both. Both have good jabs. Kovalev had a more powerful one, IMO.

Footwork - edge to Bivol. Kovalev had a pretty good footwork, but he tended to square his feet at times. And he was sometimes getting off-balanced as a result of it.

Defense - both aren't impossible to hit. Their defense is coming mainly from a good distance control and footwork. But if/when you succeed in getting into the range - you can hit them.

I'd say, Kovalev was getting hit cleanly a little bit more often.

Chin - Kovalev may have been more chinny. But I don't think Bivol had the power to get rid off the prime Kov. Meanwhile, Kovalev had the power to hurt Bivol. And we've seen that overhand right from Joe Smith had Bivol reeling (arguably, saved by the bell) and going into survival mode in the next round.

Kovalev had that quick, sneaky overhand right. If he could catch Bivol with it - who knows what happens?

Power - Kovalev. I think, most would be in agreement here. Bivol has some pop. Especially, when he sits down on his shots. But Kovalev could generate KO power without much effort. He could hurt you with the jab.

Handspeed - after watching through clips on both guys, it did look to me that Kovalev actually had faster hands.

Stamina - Bivol is pacing himself better. But there were several fights (Richards, Salamov) where I thought Bivol kind of slowed down by the late rounds and was doing a lot of coasting.

Ring IQ - I don't think anyone would've had obvious advantage here. Kovalev was a more emotional fighter, perhaps. But his smarts inside the ring are probably underrated today.

Both are great ring generals.

Inside game - prior to Canelo fight, I didn't think Bivol was an effective inside fighter. But he fought at close well against Alvarez. However, in the clinch, Kovalev was a more active and rougher of the two. He liked those coughing right hands behind the ear.
Great comparisons right there. :TU:
Thank you! 🙂 🤝 Hope it wasn't that much of a long read!)
scorpio83
Middleweight
Posts: 4592
Joined: 18 Aug 2013, 06:01

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Dmitry Bivol

Post by scorpio83 »

EdwardRevolver1993 wrote: 27 Apr 2024, 14:09
scorpio83 wrote: 27 Apr 2024, 12:50
EdwardRevolver1993 wrote: 27 Apr 2024, 12:35 Honestly, I'd take Kovalev (a 2013-2016 version). A lot of things being equal between the two, I think Kovalev's power (backed up by skills) would eventually become the deciding factor in this fight.

For those, who won't mind reading to the end, here's my more detailed breakdown/comparison of fighters' strength and weaknesses:

Jab - jab is a dominant weapon for both. Both have good jabs. Kovalev had a more powerful one, IMO.

Footwork - edge to Bivol. Kovalev had a pretty good footwork, but he tended to square his feet at times. And he was sometimes getting off-balanced as a result of it.

Defense - both aren't impossible to hit. Their defense is coming mainly from a good distance control and footwork. But if/when you succeed in getting into the range - you can hit them.

I'd say, Kovalev was getting hit cleanly a little bit more often.

Chin - Kovalev may have been more chinny. But I don't think Bivol had the power to get rid off the prime Kov. Meanwhile, Kovalev had the power to hurt Bivol. And we've seen that overhand right from Joe Smith had Bivol reeling (arguably, saved by the bell) and going into survival mode in the next round.

Kovalev had that quick, sneaky overhand right. If he could catch Bivol with it - who knows what happens?

Power - Kovalev. I think, most would be in agreement here. Bivol has some pop. Especially, when he sits down on his shots. But Kovalev could generate KO power without much effort. He could hurt you with the jab.

Handspeed - after watching through clips on both guys, it did look to me that Kovalev actually had faster hands.

Stamina - Bivol is pacing himself better. But there were several fights (Richards, Salamov) where I thought Bivol kind of slowed down by the late rounds and was doing a lot of coasting.

Ring IQ - I don't think anyone would've had obvious advantage here. Kovalev was a more emotional fighter, perhaps. But his smarts inside the ring are probably underrated today.

Both are great ring generals.

Inside game - prior to Canelo fight, I didn't think Bivol was an effective inside fighter. But he fought at close well against Alvarez. However, in the clinch, Kovalev was a more active and rougher of the two. He liked those coughing right hands behind the ear.
Great comparisons right there. :TU:
Thank you! 🙂 🤝 Hope it wasn't that much of a long read!)
No problem and it was interesting how good both fighters were.
EdwardRevolver1993
Welterweight
Posts: 782
Joined: 11 Apr 2016, 08:09

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Dmitry Bivol

Post by EdwardRevolver1993 »

scorpio83 wrote: 28 Apr 2024, 06:15
EdwardRevolver1993 wrote: 27 Apr 2024, 14:09
scorpio83 wrote: 27 Apr 2024, 12:50

Great comparisons right there. :TU:
Thank you! 🙂 🤝 Hope it wasn't that much of a long read!)
No problem and it was interesting how good both fighters were.
Thanks again!) What are your thoughts on Bivol-Beterbiev fight (June 1st)?
scorpio83
Middleweight
Posts: 4592
Joined: 18 Aug 2013, 06:01

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Dmitry Bivol

Post by scorpio83 »

Edward, they would both put on a classic boxing matchup.
Post Reply