Badly injured Vitali Klitschko vs. Hasim Rahman

Post Reply

Could a one-legged Vitali Klitschko beat Hasim Rahman?

Poll ended at 14 Sep 2006, 16:52

Yes, hobbling around in great pain, unable to sit down on his punches and with virtually no footwork, Vitali could still beat Rahman.
4
25%
No, of course not. It would be a much different story if Vitali was uninjured, though
5
31%
Rahman destroys any version of Quitali.
7
44%
 
Total votes: 16
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

Is this the sort of stuff you write for these mysterious 'other' boxing sites??... no wonder nobodies heard of them!.... :TU: :roll: :roll: :box: 8)
Top
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

By the way I loved the way the great Rahman did 'the wobbly' dance against Maskaev recently!... nice one!... :TU: :wink: :roll: :box: :box:
Top
Cojimar 1945
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 482
Joined: 07 Oct 2003, 15:15

Maskaev

Post by Cojimar 1945 »

I heard that Maskaev beat Vitali in the amateurs. Does anyone know more about this fight?
Top
barry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3797
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

re

Post by barry »

All I can say is..at least Maskaev had the balls to get in the ring with Rahman...something Vitali certainly lacked!
Top
wouter
Editor
Editor
Posts: 4800
Joined: 04 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: re

Post by wouter »

barry wrote:All I can say is..at least Maskaev had the balls to get in the ring with Rahman...something Vitali certainly lacked!
Wasn't that the injury that caused Vtali to retire, the lack of balls?
Top
barry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3797
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

re

Post by barry »

>>>Wasn't that the injury that caused Vtali to retire, the lack of balls?<<<

I wouldn't call it an injury...I'd just state it for what it is!
Top
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

If Vitali was so eager for a rematch with Lewis, why would he be scared of Rahman for Christsakes??... lets be real here!... noone of unbiased sound mind can really believe that Vitali retired because he was scared of Rahman or anyone else for that matter!...

Maybe Rocky Marcinao retired because he was scared of Floyd Patterson???...
Top
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

Decagon wrote:You've never heard of CBS Sportsline?
And they say sports journalism isnt dead!...
Top
barry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3797
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

re

Post by barry »

While personally I do not think he retired because of Rahman, he was, nonetheless, a heavyweight who should never be any debates about all-time great heavyweights...unless it is someone talking about Lennox Lewis...who though he was the dominant heavyweight of his era, was he truly an all-time great heavyweight...Vitali certainly was not!
Top
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: re

Post by pundit »

barry wrote:>>>Wasn't that the injury that caused Vtali to retire, the lack of balls?<<<

I wouldn't call it an injury...I'd just state it for what it is!
Sure you have detailed insider knowledge on this. :roll:
Top
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Badly injured Vitali Klitschko vs. Hasim Rahman

Post by pundit »

Dull thread.
Top
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: Badly injured Vitali Klitschko vs. Hasim Rahman

Post by The Great John L »

pundit wrote:Dull thread.
Dull yes, but it clearly shows that posters clearly consider Rahman better than Vitali by a WIDE 10-2 margin. :TU:
Top
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Badly injured Vitali Klitschko vs. Hasim Rahman

Post by pundit »

The Great John L wrote:
pundit wrote:Dull thread.
Dull yes, but it clearly shows that posters clearly consider Rahman better than Vitali by a WIDE 10-2 margin. :TU:
I knew you had trouble interpreting polls that don't go your way... :lol:
Top
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: Badly injured Vitali Klitschko vs. Hasim Rahman

Post by The Great John L »

pundit wrote:
The Great John L wrote:
pundit wrote:Dull thread.
Dull yes, but it clearly shows that posters clearly consider Rahman better than Vitali by a WIDE 10-2 margin. :TU:
I knew you had trouble interpreting polls that don't go your way... :lol:
OK, it's 11-3. BTW, this isn't my poll.
Top
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Badly injured Vitali Klitschko vs. Hasim Rahman

Post by pundit »

The Great John L wrote:
pundit wrote:
The Great John L wrote: Dull yes, but it clearly shows that posters clearly consider Rahman better than Vitali by a WIDE 10-2 margin. :TU:
I knew you had trouble interpreting polls that don't go your way... :lol:
OK, it's 11-3. BTW, this isn't my poll.
Strange, I have it 6-8.

No, it's not your poll, your posts don't tend to be that dull.
Top
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

I suspect this would come out about the same as Blutto with a bad hangover vs Popeye without spinach.
Top
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

funny how everyone critised Vitali when it was rumored he was going to fight Maskaev, because Rahman is far better than him :lol:
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Boxing History”