Chisora v Joyce announced

Sendo Takeshi
Flyweight
Posts: 899
Joined: 23 Dec 2023, 15:07

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by Sendo Takeshi »

The fight that decides who is going to go to the nursing home.
It's obviously just a money fight, but at 38 years old, Joyce can't really afford those if he wants a title shot.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13411
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by jameswilson »

For those who don't remember one of the funniest post fight interviews ever. It's up there with Hennessy's shades of ali rant.


KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26615
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by KiwiRider »

Del can be a lot more active than Zhang - when he really wants it.

There are two Chisoras, one that shows up to really fight, and can be a handful, and one that shows up to collect a cheque.
See Parker vs Chisora #1 & #2
And yes, I agree with most here, this could be painful to watch.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13411
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by jameswilson »

I think this will be similar to Joyce v Takam and Hammer.

Joyce will take a few winging hayemakers on the chin and we'll go 'ohhhhh' and bit by bit he will break the opponent down.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by funso banjo baby »

MasterG wrote: 22 May 2024, 12:46 This should take the conversation away from Fury for a bit.

July 27th O2 London



Dull as ditchwater fight
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

KiwiRider wrote: 22 May 2024, 17:02 Del can be a lot more active than Zhang - when he really wants it.

There are two Chisoras, one that shows up to really fight, and can be a handful, and one that shows up to collect a cheque.
See Parker vs Chisora #1 & #2
And yes, I agree with most here, this could be painful to watch.
Del is as old as a meteorite - I don't believe he can recapture that kind of form.

Having said that, the beating that Joyce took from Zhang, looked like a career ender.

This is like a destruction derby, entertaining, but you know that nobody is leaving the arena without being seriously bent out of shape.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

SeanBrennan wrote: 22 May 2024, 15:33 I like this for what it is, will be two very hard guys fighting. I think Joyce gets a stoppage and is back in the game.
Back in what game? Do we think Joyce is capable of beating a top contender now, I'm not sold on that. I think he's done. Slow as shite through a funnel, and his chin is cracked, that's a recipe for a beating if he steps up again.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28487
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by Coco »

Both are always in good fights, it will be good to watch
Fearful_Freddie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 887
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 23:36

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by Fearful_Freddie »

Irrespective of the result, they both should retire afterwards. Both are way past their best and don't have anything more to prove.
paultom
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 563
Joined: 26 May 2021, 16:21

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by paultom »

Coco wrote: 22 May 2024, 18:38 Both are always in good fights, it will be good to watch
Both are in good fights because they both take a lot of punishment,it's not a good move for either and as others have commented,they should both be thinking seriously about jacking it in asap.Chisora has looked shot for ages and Joyce looked terrible in his last fight.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13311
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by MightyWarrior »

At last, the fight no body wanted
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9185
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by gregregegg »

This is a good fight.

Other than hay no one has stopped him in less than 10 rounds. And many good fighters have gone 12 with him.

Joyce whacks but is still more a ware you down type.

Given it will likely go some rounds chisora should land some bombs, because even raggard sloppy slow chiz can find that chin.

Fave but after getting stopped horrifically twice this is a live fight.
olij999
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1242
Joined: 14 Jun 2004, 08:22

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by olij999 »

Ugh. Horrible fight. Nothing to prevent it, assuming they have passed their medicals, but it will be a mauling, attritional bout where both are likely to take significant punishment, and for what? Just for the chance to fight someone next who is slightly better than either of them and will give them a protracted battering? And, despite their ages and records, this absolutely isn't "loser has nowhere to go" territory - if that were true, then it was true of about a dozen previous Chisora fights, many of which he has lost, and he's still here. The heavyweight division loves to recycle and recycle, and if the loser wants to fight on, there'll be work for them at a level outside world top 10 but within world top 50.

So as previous posters have said, there's nothing to stop this fight, etc etc, but it's not one for me.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by stujones »

olij999 wrote: 23 May 2024, 05:45 Ugh. Horrible fight. Nothing to prevent it, assuming they have passed their medicals, but it will be a mauling, attritional bout where both are likely to take significant punishment, and for what? Just for the chance to fight someone next who is slightly better than either of them and will give them a protracted battering? And, despite their ages and records, this absolutely isn't "loser has nowhere to go" territory - if that were true, then it was true of about a dozen previous Chisora fights, many of which he has lost, and he's still here. The heavyweight division loves to recycle and recycle, and if the loser wants to fight on, there'll be work for them at a level outside world top 10 but within world top 50.

So as previous posters have said, there's nothing to stop this fight, etc etc, but it's not one for me.
Yes absolutely, the recycling of heavyweight losers just cause of name value is a bit depressing.

Take Deontay Wilder won less than 5 rounds in 3 fights vs Fury, now late 30s and coming off a fight where he won zero rounds… yet immediately in a big fight.


God back in the day even Fury after his last two performances would need to prove himself worthy of fighting the top boys.


Give people like Hirgovic, kabel god even Wardley a go.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

gregregegg wrote: 23 May 2024, 05:31 This is a good fight.

Other than hay no one has stopped him in less than 10 rounds. And many good fighters have gone 12 with him.

Joyce whacks but is still more a ware you down type.

Given it will likely go some rounds chisora should land some bombs, because even raggard sloppy slow chiz can find that chin.

Fave but after getting stopped horrifically twice this is a live fight.
It's a godawful fight.
rob h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 610
Joined: 15 Dec 2006, 08:36

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by rob h »

I've thought Joyce sounds punchy - even since the amateurs.
paultom
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 563
Joined: 26 May 2021, 16:21

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by paultom »

Warren claiming the winner will be right back in the mix ? in the mix for another good hiding he means
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4097
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by black panther »

Forget Fast & Furious tune into Joyce Vs Chisora: Slow & Placid

Sadly both past their prime both around 40. Do hope Joyce can get a good pay day or two off the back of this then call it.

Chisora has already made plenty from boxing just hope he calls it a day soon before he gets lasting damage, if he hasn't already.
TBA
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 182
Joined: 19 Mar 2005, 19:08

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by TBA »

It's a good fight to see how much Joyce has left in the tank. If anything.
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3341
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by Twinkle Toes »

Where did this come from! - Not one to set the pulse racing. I expect the juggernaut to win comfortably.
paultom
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 563
Joined: 26 May 2021, 16:21

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by paultom »

TBA wrote: 23 May 2024, 09:04 It's a good fight to see how much Joyce has left in the tank. If anything.
Not really,he'll just the 14th person to beat Chisora.If Joyce won in one round,it wouldn't stop him getting leathered in his next fight.

14th loss I meant
paultom
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 563
Joined: 26 May 2021, 16:21

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by paultom »

Twinkle Toes wrote: 23 May 2024, 09:59 Where did this come from! - Not one to set the pulse racing. I expect the juggernaut to win comfortably.
This fight won't tell us who is the best,just who is worse than the other at this stage
Ricky
Lightweight
Posts: 13893
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 09:27

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by Ricky »

Harder to think of a fighter that's a better candidate for permanent brain damage than Chisora. Another fight that he'll absorb a huge amount of damage before the ref has mercy in the latter rounds.
cormack
Super Featherweight
Posts: 2965
Joined: 30 May 2019, 07:13

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by cormack »

wow !
batter fest

I fancy old boy del to zangh JJ
paultom
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 563
Joined: 26 May 2021, 16:21

Re: Chisora v Joyce announced

Post by paultom »

Ricky wrote: 23 May 2024, 10:20 Harder to think of a fighter that's a better candidate for permanent brain damage than Chisora. Another fight that he'll absorb a huge amount of damage before the ref has mercy in the latter rounds.
Only Danny Williams i'd say
Post Reply