Majority scoring

[jezzamundo]

Looking at a lot of fights and using majority scoring (one scorecard that awards each round to the fighter who got the nod on at least 2 of the 3 scorecards) we tend to end up with a pretty good result. Examples:

Lewis Holyfield 1: 115-113 Lewis
Pacquiao Marquez 1: 113-112 Marquez
Golovkin Canelo: 115-113 Golovkin
Fury Wilder 1: 114-112 Fury
Usyk Joshua 2: 115-113 Usyk
Fury Ngannou: 96-93 Fury
Usyk Fury: 114-113 Usyk

Of course it doesn't work for every fight - a prime example being Mayweather-Castillo 1, where Floyd would still win a wide decision.

[Ruthless-RKO]

Golovkin Canelo: 115-113 Golovkin

Of course it doesn't work for every fight - a prime example being Mayweather-Castillo 1, where Floyd would still win a wide decision.

Surprised but then not at this. cus Byrd had it 118-110 didn't she?

But then I guess most the rounds, the other two judges overruled her..

[joshj909]

Fury Ngannou: 96-93 Fury

Looks to rectify all of the others but Fury did not win this fight.

Bias, corruption and inadequate judges will often still side with the A side when they don't know who to give the ground to.

[jezzamundo]

It sometimes comes up with worse scorecards too. 116-112 to Canelo in the 2nd GGG fight, for instance