Adam Smith

NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4450
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: Adam Smith

Post by NazNaci1 »

nobleart1978 wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 10:43 Annoying bloke. He genuinely gives me the creeps, especially when he stares directly into the camera. Weird guy.
He does have a weird, creepy look, I'd, personally, have to agree. Could not stand his 'growling' commentary, either.

Plus side, he is a genuine boxing fan and clearly, a bright guy. Just do not need to hear him droning on or shooting freaky glances at the camera.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39204
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Adam Smith

Post by margaret thatcher »

there was a war recently between an irish kid as the home fighter and a mexican kid. real gruelling stuff, irish kid was dropped and given hell, but had enough moments outboxing the mexican to win a deserved 1 point decision . afterward he admitted it was brutal for him in there

pretty much all smith could focus on was how much of a masterclass it was from the irish kid and how he dominated outside a little blip in 1 round, and then expressed shock at how close the score was. hardly anything about it being an awesome fight. you never wouldve expected it was such banger listening to him.

he's a full blown cheerleader, great that he's healthy now and loves boxing, but cant stand commentators like him. only worse one in last decade or so in uk was nick haling

smithy tries too much to take control of the commentary and force a narrative. i know it's a standard thing for commentary to kiss some ass, but he really goes all in with it
Last edited by margaret thatcher on 10 Jun 2024, 12:27, edited 1 time in total.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Deserter »

margaret thatcher wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 12:19 smithy tries too much to take control of the commentary and create a vision of it based on the outcomes he wants to see
Yep, as much as I'd like to see him do well now, that doesn't include getting back behind the mic and you've absolutely nailed it as to why he simply isn't good in that role. The best commentators do 2 things:
1. Resist the natural inclination towards confirmation bias.
2. Recognise the power of silience when appropriate.
Unfortunately he never developed either skill.
TheLeprechaun
Middleweight
Posts: 5135
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Adam Smith

Post by TheLeprechaun »

Deserter wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 12:27
margaret thatcher wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 12:19 smithy tries too much to take control of the commentary and create a vision of it based on the outcomes he wants to see
Yep, as much as I'd like to see him do well now, that doesn't include getting back behind the mic and you've absolutely nailed it as to why he simply isn't good in that role. The best commentators do 2 things:
1. Resist the natural inclination towards confirmation bias.
2. Recognise the power of silience when appropriate.
Unfortunately he never developed either skill.
There are rare moments where open bias is ok e.g "Get in there Frank!!"
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6452
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Adam Smith

Post by JamesPhilips »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 12:54
Deserter wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 12:27
margaret thatcher wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 12:19 smithy tries too much to take control of the commentary and create a vision of it based on the outcomes he wants to see
Yep, as much as I'd like to see him do well now, that doesn't include getting back behind the mic and you've absolutely nailed it as to why he simply isn't good in that role. The best commentators do 2 things:
1. Resist the natural inclination towards confirmation bias.
2. Recognise the power of silience when appropriate.
Unfortunately he never developed either skill.
There are rare moments where open bias is ok e.g "Get in there Frank!!"
Yes. This had soul
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13248
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Adam Smith

Post by MightyWarrior »

Absolute bonehead - good news he’s on the radio, cause you can turn the bastard off and watch TV instead, without him ruining it, thank God

Great guy though
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Coco »

We are regularly told he is a nice guy who loves boxing

Never accused of doing a good job though
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Fray Bentos »

Deserter wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 12:27
margaret thatcher wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 12:19 smithy tries too much to take control of the commentary and create a vision of it based on the outcomes he wants to see
Yep, as much as I'd like to see him do well now, that doesn't include getting back behind the mic and you've absolutely nailed it as to why he simply isn't good in that role. The best commentators do 2 things:
1. Resist the natural inclination towards confirmation bias.
2. Recognise the power of silience when appropriate.
Unfortunately he never developed either skill.
Based on those two qualities, Steve Holdsworth is amazing. :TU:
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Fray Bentos »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 12:54
Deserter wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 12:27
margaret thatcher wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 12:19 smithy tries too much to take control of the commentary and create a vision of it based on the outcomes he wants to see
Yep, as much as I'd like to see him do well now, that doesn't include getting back behind the mic and you've absolutely nailed it as to why he simply isn't good in that role. The best commentators do 2 things:
1. Resist the natural inclination towards confirmation bias.
2. Recognise the power of silience when appropriate.
Unfortunately he never developed either skill.
There are rare moments where open bias is ok e.g "Get in there Frank!!"
It was part of a very charming and very public double act - they were friends and in one of the few times in over forty years 'arry swept aside his neutrality because he wanted his friend to win - which melted the nation at the time.

Adam Smith is just a company man - he will support the fighters of the company who pays him and sponsors them.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Coco »

Steve Holdsworth never got taken on, on the bigger channels because he was too honest

Good bloke is Steve
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Fray Bentos »

Coco wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 03:59 We are regularly told he is a nice guy who loves boxing

Never accused of doing a good job though
As a commentator he is forgettable, not particularly 'bad' but if you have grown up with 'arry, Reg, Jim and one or two others like we have - then Adam Smith will never ever cut it with us :lol:
TheLeprechaun
Middleweight
Posts: 5135
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Adam Smith

Post by TheLeprechaun »

Coco wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 04:04 Steve Holdsworth never got taken on, on the bigger channels because he was too honest

Good bloke is Steve
100%.

The bloke had to slave away on Eurosport cards.
Giancarlo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2316
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 15:32

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Giancarlo »

Coco wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 04:04 Steve Holdsworth never got taken on, on the bigger channels because he was too honest

Good bloke is Steve
I remember him from way back when he used to film small hall shows and advertise them for sale in the classifieds in Boxing News.

I bought some cracking fights from him.

The very earliest ones were without commentary, just crowd noise but still great and they had plenty of atmosphere in some of those now forgotten venues like the Merton Civic Hall, Croydon, The Baths, Dulwich and many more.

After a while he started to commentate on them and you could tell he was a natural. Good voice and an insiders understanding of what was happening and/or likely to happen. As someone has also mentioned he knew the value of silence and would often let the action speak for itself.

Then he got on Eurosport and he'd pop up almost every week in some 'exotic' spot in continental Europe. He must have had bags of stamina, from his boxing training maybe, as he still got around the UK filming shows too.

Not sure why he was never picked up by the bigger companies. Maybe he was happy doing it his own way.

Is he still around? He'd be a fantastic addition to this forum.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Coco »

Giancarlo wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 15:23
Coco wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 04:04 Steve Holdsworth never got taken on, on the bigger channels because he was too honest

Good bloke is Steve
I remember him from way back when he used to film small hall shows and advertise them for sale in the classifieds in Boxing News.

I bought some cracking fights from him.

The very earliest ones were without commentary, just crowd noise but still great and they had plenty of atmosphere in some of those now forgotten venues like the Merton Civic Hall, Croydon, The Baths, Dulwich and many more.

After a while he started to commentate on them and you could tell he was a natural. Good voice and an insiders understanding of what was happening and/or likely to happen. As someone has also mentioned he knew the value of silence and would often let the action speak for itself.

Then he got on Eurosport and he'd pop up almost every week in some 'exotic' spot in continental Europe. He must have had bags of stamina, from his boxing training maybe, as he still got around the UK filming shows too.

Not sure why he was never picked up by the bigger companies. Maybe he was happy doing it his own way.

Is he still around? He'd be a fantastic addition to this forum.
Too honest to be picked up, I don't think he was there for all of the events, doing a bit of live feed I think.
But yeah a guy who has been there and got the tee shirt which would probably make him unpopular on the forum!
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4450
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: Adam Smith

Post by NazNaci1 »

Coco wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 04:04 Steve Holdsworth never got taken on, on the bigger channels because he was too honest

Good bloke is Steve
I think I have mentioned this before, on one particular Eurosport card (in Germany), you could email him, during the broadcast and he would read out and reply, on air.

This was at the height of Hatton's WBU reign and I emailed him and said I thought 'Allegedly' was, as is his want, mugging off the fans, putting poor opponents, often old, worn and coming up in weight, to fight and pad Hatton's WBU legacy......he replied, but rather than read my question out, for obvious reasons, just said, 'Yes, Naz, from London. I couldn't agree more'.

It was a classy touch and felt good, responding and agreeing with me, but of course, the thousands of listeners had no idea what the question was. Still, I didn't care.

Quality commentator and straight up guy.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39204
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Adam Smith

Post by margaret thatcher »

:OhYes:
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9634
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Adam Smith

Post by SeanBrennan »

NazNaci1 wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 16:47
Coco wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 04:04 Steve Holdsworth never got taken on, on the bigger channels because he was too honest

Good bloke is Steve
I think I have mentioned this before, on one particular Eurosport card (in Germany), you could email him, during the broadcast and he would read out and reply, on air.

This was at the height of Hatton's WBU reign and I emailed him and said I thought 'Allegedly' was, as is his want, mugging off the fans, putting poor opponents, often old, worn and coming up in weight, to fight and pad Hatton's WBU legacy......he replied, but rather than read my question out, for obvious reasons, just said, 'Yes, Naz, from London. I couldn't agree more'.

It was a classy touch and felt good, responding and agreeing with me, but of course, the thousands of listeners had no idea what the question was. Still, I didn't care.

Quality commentator and straight up guy.
that's brilliant!
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Deserter »

SeanBrennan wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 17:31
NazNaci1 wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 16:47
Coco wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 04:04 Steve Holdsworth never got taken on, on the bigger channels because he was too honest

Good bloke is Steve
I think I have mentioned this before, on one particular Eurosport card (in Germany), you could email him, during the broadcast and he would read out and reply, on air.

This was at the height of Hatton's WBU reign and I emailed him and said I thought 'Allegedly' was, as is his want, mugging off the fans, putting poor opponents, often old, worn and coming up in weight, to fight and pad Hatton's WBU legacy......he replied, but rather than read my question out, for obvious reasons, just said, 'Yes, Naz, from London. I couldn't agree more'.

It was a classy touch and felt good, responding and agreeing with me, but of course, the thousands of listeners had no idea what the question was. Still, I didn't care.

Quality commentator and straight up guy.
that's brilliant!
x2 :bow:
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13248
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Adam Smith

Post by MightyWarrior »

When boxing monthly launched, Steve Holdsworth was the advertising manager. He got a lot of ads in and I think the power went to his head, I can’t remember the exact details, but it all went tits up and he was fired before issue two.
Like a dumbass I took on the job, went in first day to find Steve had allegedly freaked out and smashed the place up :oo

I was thinking f**k me what have I walked into here?!
It didn’t start well, it didn’t end well …I was fired 6 months later :lol: .
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Coco »

MightyWarrior wrote: 12 Jun 2024, 04:38 When boxing monthly launched, Steve Holdsworth was the advertising manager. He got a lot of ads in and I think the power went to his head, I can’t remember the exact details, but it all went tits up and he was fired before issue two.
Like a dumbass I took on the job, went in first day to find Steve had allegedly freaked out and smashed the place up :oo

I was thinking f**k me what have I walked into here?!
It didn’t start well, it didn’t end well …I was fired 6 months later :lol: .
Sounds like boxing monthly was the problem?
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13248
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Adam Smith

Post by MightyWarrior »

You could say that, though getting advertisers in for boxing was a tough one, the red light district of the sport etc . The editorial team and writers were excellent ( lots of old boxing news faces like Steve and Tony Connolly, I think Barry Hugman was the catalyst behind it ) but the MD was a Notting Hill guy called Ed Crawshaw, who had absolutely no interest in boxing at all, outside of making some dough. One of the interns there at the time was a goofy young kid called Spencer Fearon.

Once Crawshaw bailed, Glynn leach took over and really made it his own, god bless him
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2696
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Flump »

Deserter wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 17:37
SeanBrennan wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 17:31
NazNaci1 wrote: 11 Jun 2024, 16:47
I think I have mentioned this before, on one particular Eurosport card (in Germany), you could email him, during the broadcast and he would read out and reply, on air.

This was at the height of Hatton's WBU reign and I emailed him and said I thought 'Allegedly' was, as is his want, mugging off the fans, putting poor opponents, often old, worn and coming up in weight, to fight and pad Hatton's WBU legacy......he replied, but rather than read my question out, for obvious reasons, just said, 'Yes, Naz, from London. I couldn't agree more'.

It was a classy touch and felt good, responding and agreeing with me, but of course, the thousands of listeners had no idea what the question was. Still, I didn't care.

Quality commentator and straight up guy.
that's brilliant!
x2 :bow:
The one time he was on Sky, and this is from a near 30 year ago memory, he was commentating on Bugner v Welch with Nicky Piper. I think his opening line was something along the lines of "This is for the WBO Penta Continental title, I'm not sure exactly what that is Nicky?" Piper replied with something like "Nothing title, created for television". Never saw them together again, sadly.
nobleart1978
Welterweight
Posts: 722
Joined: 25 Jun 2015, 16:18

Re: Adam Smith

Post by nobleart1978 »

Steve Holdsworth was a good commentator. I enjoyed listening to him. On the subject of BM, I liked it when it first came out with Barry Hugman as editor.

Back to the forum though, Adam " The Weirdo" Smith should NEVER, EVER be mentioned in the same breath as Harry Carpenter, Reg Gutteridge or, don't forget, Des Lynam, who used to do the radio commentary on Radio 2 with Our Enery doing the inter-rounds back in the day.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9634
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Adam Smith

Post by SeanBrennan »

nobleart1978 wrote: 14 Jun 2024, 12:55 Steve Holdsworth was a good commentator. I enjoyed listening to him. On the subject of BM, I liked it when it first came out with Barry Hugman as editor.

Back to the forum though, Adam " The Weirdo" Smith should NEVER, EVER be mentioned in the same breath as Harry Carpenter, Reg Gutteridge or, don't forget, Des Lynam, who used to do the radio commentary on Radio 2 with Our Enery doing the inter-rounds back in the day.
I don't thin it's fair to call him a weirdo. That's just an immature slur. He is nice to everyone, loves the sport and has lots of knowledge and has battled cancer with more dignity than someone lobbing insults on a forum on a Friday will ever. Shame on you. The first 3 letters of your forum name are decidedly accurate.
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3302
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Adam Smith

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

That’s a bit harsh Sean

I’m sure noble wasn’t being malicious and tbf Smith does have a reputation on these pages as being a bit of a nerd a geek a weirdo whatever, they’re just little throwaway remarks that describe his very bookish style of commentary / punditry

Everybody respects Adam for the way he’s bravely battled cancer but that doesn’t mean people can’t critique his work using some pretty blunt terms and I’m sure Adam himself wouldn’t want or need to be treated with kid gloves
Post Reply