Lying tale of the tapes

dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Lying tale of the tapes

Post by dempseyfire »

Nile4000 wrote: 18 Jun 2024, 13:57 Michael Dokes wasn't 6'3", and George Foreman wasn't either.

Definitely agree Dokes wasn't 6'3. His reach was also highly inflated; often listed as 78' & sometimes more, but I saw one listing at 74' and that looks much more accurate.

Foreman wasn't 6'3 as in he was taller? He was definitely in the 6'3-6'4 range.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39272
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Lying tale of the tapes

Post by margaret thatcher »

you can see dokes has stubby arms , no way he had a 78 unless he was all shoulders
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

Re: Lying tale of the tapes

Post by goose 5 »

Ali claimed Foreman was 6'2.5"
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9186
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Lying tale of the tapes

Post by Controversial »

I don’t think Ali was 6’3” if you watch him face off with Henry Cooper there isn’t a lot in it and Cooper is normally listed as being 6’1.5” so I reckon Ali was maybe a shade over 6’2

Bugner looked clearly taller than Cooper when they fought and Bugner was allegedly 6’4
Post Reply