Spinks

forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5432
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Spinks

Post by forcefraser »

Would Michael Spinks have beaten Bivol and/or Beterbiew at light heavy? I reckon he`s got a good shout
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39233
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Spinks

Post by margaret thatcher »

massive light heavy with serious power and skill packaged in an awkward style. fit guy who could do 15. certainly he'd have a good shot vs either at minimum, possibly beat both. could be convincing jobs too
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16822
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Spinks

Post by keithmoonhangover »

forcefraser wrote: 24 Jun 2024, 18:13 Would Michael Spinks have beaten Bivol and/or Beterbiew at light heavy? I reckon he`s got a good shout
Prime, I'd take him to beat both of them clearly, although not at the same time.
big lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2550
Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44

Re: Spinks

Post by big lennox »

My money would be on Spinks.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28337
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Spinks

Post by Coco »

I would fancy Spinks
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5432
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Spinks

Post by forcefraser »

Much love for Spinks.

I think people generally remember him more for his loss to Tyson than the great work he did at light heavy and the way he fought tooth and nail with Larry Holmes, despite giving up a fair amount of weight.

Great fighter
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8569
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Spinks

Post by coneye »

My money on spinks , The Tyson he fought was at his absolute best , caught spinks cold and it did'nt do spinks justice Spinks was a great fighter
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Spinks

Post by Counter-puncher »

yeah i go with the majority here, too much power for Bivol and too fvcking awkward/strong/fit for Beterbiev on a styles basis.

Spinks would have to be an all-time top 5 awkward style to deal with
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Spinks

Post by Fray Bentos »

Spinks is an ATG at light heavy - top three and the era he was champ - the rankings was a murderers row of contenders - probably the most in-depth in the history of the division. :salut:
olij999
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1242
Joined: 14 Jun 2004, 08:22

Re: Spinks

Post by olij999 »

Michael Spinks wins all day long.
Leon Spinks loses
Terry Spinks loses.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13372
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Spinks

Post by jameswilson »

olij999 wrote: 25 Jun 2024, 11:53 Michael Spinks wins all day long.
Leon Spinks loses
Terry Spinks loses.
What about Jar Jar Binks?
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Spinks

Post by Fray Bentos »

Mummery wrote: 25 Jun 2024, 09:01
Fray Bentos wrote: 25 Jun 2024, 07:03 Spinks is an ATG at light heavy - top three and the era he was champ - the rankings was a murderers row of contenders - probably the most in-depth in the history of the division. :salut:
Agreed Carlos, top 3 at the weight. He’d make Beterbiev look slower than a week in the jail. 🫡
:salut: and welcome!
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Spinks

Post by Counter-puncher »

I'd love a hypo with beterbiev vs Peak Qawi
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4480
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Spinks

Post by dookus »

Spinks was an absolute monster at LHW. I'd pick him over both by stoppage.
TheLeprechaun
Middleweight
Posts: 5149
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Spinks

Post by TheLeprechaun »

Spinks beats them but they are still elite fighters. Spinks was just the best 175 pounder ever, so far anyway.
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5348
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Re: Spinks

Post by dr_devious »

Nah that's Ezzard Charles
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9729
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Spinks

Post by SeanBrennan »

for me, no chance, we view past boxer through a mirage of a lens, most modern boxers would smash the previous ones.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Spinks

Post by DrDuke »

Actually, today I'd pick Spinks over any LHW ever.
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3336
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Spinks

Post by Twinkle Toes »

Spinks was very awkward, as well as being huge at the weight. Very difficult to beat on any given day. A proper old school 15 round fighter. Going up and beating Holmes was some effort, and he beat Holmes at his own game (2nd fight was a bit of a gift though)

He'd give Bivol and Beterbiev fits. I think we give modern fighters way too much credit when looking at how'd they do against past fighters.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39233
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Spinks

Post by margaret thatcher »

i mean in the grand scheme of things spinks didnt really box that long ago. boxing technique was pretty much the same as it is today by that point. day before weigh ins started and guys were starting to more closely resemble the size of current boxers in each division. it's not like the crude jousting matches of the early 1900s or the eras where 5'7 168 pounders were heavyweight champs. if anything, fitness was greater in the 15 round era. spinks prob a bit underpowered as a heavy, but as a light heavy he ticks all the boxes

to be arguably the greatest lhw ever, and then end the unbeaten run of larry holmes at hw, that is pretty special
si7dog7
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1009
Joined: 26 Feb 2013, 14:42

Re: Spinks

Post by si7dog7 »

The Jinx was absolute quality.
Think he’d hang with any from any era at LH.
No doubt.
Maybe rose tinted glasses as my real era as a fan .
Loynesy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1767
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 08:29

Re: Spinks

Post by Loynesy »

Spinks v RJJ. What would you pay for that?

I don't have historic spectacles, I've just loved boxing for 45 years plus. Would pick prime RJJ as he was faster but of course MS was much heavier handed.
si7dog7
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1009
Joined: 26 Feb 2013, 14:42

Re: Spinks

Post by si7dog7 »

Loynesy wrote: 27 Jun 2024, 14:21 Spinks v RJJ. What would you pay for that?

I don't have historic spectacles, I've just loved boxing for 45 years plus. Would pick prime RJJ as he was faster but of course MS was much heavier handed.
Wow. Now that’s a match up.
Think RJJ was a better SM. But yep this match up works on all levels.
Quandary now Loynesy. You got me.
Spectacles in the bin!!

But we all got RJJ over the current 2 yes?
Loynesy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1767
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 08:29

Re: Spinks

Post by Loynesy »

It would be the cliched "someone's 0 has got to go".
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28337
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Spinks

Post by Coco »

Spinks came up from 12 stone 6, not 14 stone 4.

Obviously he was talented, but an animal too, like Duran
Post Reply