I read the BBBoC news confirming Morris vs Simpson 2, but why is Foster vs Morris off. Is there an injury? Did Frank realise that he would be losing the shine off one of his prospects, so decided against showcasing this fight.
Please don't say the BBBoC deem Simpson more worthy than Foster, Morris beat him handily first time.
Why is Foster vs Morris off?
-
holyfields_ear
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 95
- Joined: 10 Jan 2005, 20:15
-
black panther
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4097
- Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
punchers chance
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 693
- Joined: 12 Jul 2005, 18:37
The article also implies that Foster is getting more £££ than Morris.
Although Morris may hold the belt, he must realise that he is not a ‘name’ fighter yet and a boxer’s opportunity to elevate himself to the sport’s high earners sometimes involves taking the worst of the money for the chance of national TV exposure.
Morris claims the fight will top a bill on its own later and he'll get more money then.
Although Morris may hold the belt, he must realise that he is not a ‘name’ fighter yet and a boxer’s opportunity to elevate himself to the sport’s high earners sometimes involves taking the worst of the money for the chance of national TV exposure.
Morris claims the fight will top a bill on its own later and he'll get more money then.
-
punchers chance
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 693
- Joined: 12 Jul 2005, 18:37