Decagon wrote:What else did he do at heavyweight? Beat Tom Heeney and Johnny Risko? That's nothing comapred to Dempsey's resume. Depsey'd been mostly inactive for five or six years when they fought and he was nowhere near his prime.
Risko, Heeney and Gibbons are at least as good as Dempsey's best opponents (plus, isn't it you who always points out that the fourth Greb fight was at heavy? Dempsey, in contrast, didn't give Greb a shot). Moreover, it also matters for my assessment what Tunney did at light-heavyweight. He had two half-careers at two different weight classes, it's the two half-careers together that make up the full Tunney.
Btw, what is the fuss about. You have Dempsey a couple of places ahead of Tunney, I have him a couple of ranks behind him. Both of us have both fighters between 10 and 13. So I can't see that we differ much here.
Where we do differ very much is with Chris Byrd as #24, e.g., ahead of a legend like Sam Langford -- Byrdie wouldn't make the top 100 on my list. More generally, I see a somewhat forced tendency in your ratings to get fighters of the 1990s and 2000s in there (as long as they are not called Klitschko). Apart from Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson and perhaps Bowe, I don't see anyone who would qualify.