If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16751
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
......which promoter could they use?
I will say, that I really appreciate the Top Rank cards on SKY. Especially watching Inoue live.
I will say, that I really appreciate the Top Rank cards on SKY. Especially watching Inoue live.
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
Don't think they should go for a single promoter, offer the dates out and give the work out on qualitykeithmoonhangover wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 09:44 ......which promoter could they use?
I will say, that I really appreciate the Top Rank cards on SKY. Especially watching Inoue live.
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
Pick and choose, say they want boxing on such a date and ask promoters what can they put on ?Coco wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 09:54Don't think they should go for a single promoter, offer the dates out and give the work out on qualitykeithmoonhangover wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 09:44 ......which promoter could they use?
I will say, that I really appreciate the Top Rank cards on SKY. Especially watching Inoue live.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32660
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
I think Don King is still active...
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100694
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
No need to be exclusive to any promotion.
I really hoped they didn’t after Matchroom left but they did.
Yeh they could have still done a deal with Boxxer, but no need to be exclusive with anyone.
They should be open. Pick and choose.
I mean the top promoters are tied with TV deals anyway.
But the likes of Hennessy, Wasserman etc.
Although I don’t mind having Channel 5 cards as well.
I really hoped they didn’t after Matchroom left but they did.
Yeh they could have still done a deal with Boxxer, but no need to be exclusive with anyone.
They should be open. Pick and choose.
I mean the top promoters are tied with TV deals anyway.
But the likes of Hennessy, Wasserman etc.
Although I don’t mind having Channel 5 cards as well.
-
JamesPhilips
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6452
- Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
They’ll probably just offer the big PPVs from Turki. The recent PPVs have been available on multiple platforms.
Shalom is an absolutely clueless student gig organiser and it shows. He’s recently served Liam Cameron with a letter before action because of Liam’s tweets.
What a scum bag bully
Shalom is an absolutely clueless student gig organiser and it shows. He’s recently served Liam Cameron with a letter before action because of Liam’s tweets.
What a scum bag bully
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32660
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
Pretty embarrassing from Boxxer, as usual.
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
izzy asif
gbm is it called .
building up on small hall shows and appears not to have the kind of BS attitude shalom has .....
gbm is it called .
building up on small hall shows and appears not to have the kind of BS attitude shalom has .....
-
JamesPhilips
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6452
- Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
Have they got any good fighters?stevec@france wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 11:41 izzy asif
gbm is it called .
building up on small hall shows and appears not to have the kind of BS attitude shalom has .....
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
younger propsects mainly and guys who were struggling to get on bigger shows .JamesPhilips wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 11:52Have they got any good fighters?stevec@france wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 11:41 izzy asif
gbm is it called .
building up on small hall shows and appears not to have the kind of BS attitude shalom has .....
clearly they / he would need to develop a batter stable but that would come with a TV deal
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
I had to unsubscribe from the gbm social media as I was sick of seeing him constantly on there channelstevec@france wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 11:41 izzy asif
gbm is it called .
building up on small hall shows and appears not to have the kind of BS attitude shalom has .....
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
Using different promoters has been tried before,never works. Promoters rely on a certain amount of security/guarantees from broadcasters so they can sign boxers,plan careers. You can't do anything with a certain amount of financisl backingtony1234 wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 09:59Pick and choose, say they want boxing on such a date and ask promoters what can they put on ?Coco wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 09:54Don't think they should go for a single promoter, offer the dates out and give the work out on qualitykeithmoonhangover wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 09:44 ......which promoter could they use?
I will say, that I really appreciate the Top Rank cards on SKY. Especially watching Inoue live.
-
Frostieballs
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 1995
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
I think it worked ok in the 90’s when you had various promoters getting 10+ dates a year on Sky. (At various times Warren/Panix/Matchroom/Hennessy).
Seemed to be a bit of competition and more activity around the British Title scene.
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
Yeah but that’s when Sky were doing 40 boxing shows a year and fighters weren’t getting paid far more than their commercial worth.Frostieballs wrote: ↑23 Jan 2025, 19:33I think it worked ok in the 90’s when you had various promoters getting 10+ dates a year on Sky. (At various times Warren/Panix/Matchroom/Hennessy).
Seemed to be a bit of competition and more activity around the British Title scene.
The economics don’t work now.
It will be interesting to see the next 4/5 years at Sky Sports. Subscriber numbers are falling as people can’t afford it/switch to illegal streaming so they’ll almost certainly be looking to cut costs.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
Some of those flyweight headliners were getting 5 grand if they were lucky.maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 03:17Yeah but that’s when Sky were doing 40 boxing shows a year and fighters weren’t getting paid far more than their commercial worth.Frostieballs wrote: ↑23 Jan 2025, 19:33I think it worked ok in the 90’s when you had various promoters getting 10+ dates a year on Sky. (At various times Warren/Panix/Matchroom/Hennessy).
Seemed to be a bit of competition and more activity around the British Title scene.
The economics don’t work now.
It will be interesting to see the next 4/5 years at Sky Sports. Subscriber numbers are falling as people can’t afford it/switch to illegal streaming so they’ll almost certainly be looking to cut costs.
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
Isn’t this just the kind of thing Frank has done for nearly all his time in boxing?JamesPhilips wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 11:25 They’ll probably just offer the big PPVs from Turki. The recent PPVs have been available on multiple platforms.
Shalom is an absolutely clueless student gig organiser and it shows. He’s recently served Liam Cameron with a letter before action because of Liam’s tweets.
What a scum bag bully
-
Frostieballs
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 1995
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
The only thing that has changed that has been Saudi money.maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 03:17Yeah but that’s when Sky were doing 40 boxing shows a year and fighters weren’t getting paid far more than their commercial worth.Frostieballs wrote: ↑23 Jan 2025, 19:33I think it worked ok in the 90’s when you had various promoters getting 10+ dates a year on Sky. (At various times Warren/Panix/Matchroom/Hennessy).
Seemed to be a bit of competition and more activity around the British Title scene.
The economics don’t work now.
It will be interesting to see the next 4/5 years at Sky Sports. Subscriber numbers are falling as people can’t afford it/switch to illegal streaming so they’ll almost certainly be looking to cut costs.
Before that hit, you still had British Champions on purses that weren’t huge.
PPV has always been an exception.
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
Yeah. And often those flyweights headlining were in decent, competitive fights. Munyai brings back memories.mickey1975 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 04:23Some of those flyweight headliners were getting 5 grand if they were lucky.maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 03:17Yeah but that’s when Sky were doing 40 boxing shows a year and fighters weren’t getting paid far more than their commercial worth.Frostieballs wrote: ↑23 Jan 2025, 19:33
I think it worked ok in the 90’s when you had various promoters getting 10+ dates a year on Sky. (At various times Warren/Panix/Matchroom/Hennessy).
Seemed to be a bit of competition and more activity around the British Title scene.
The economics don’t work now.
It will be interesting to see the next 4/5 years at Sky Sports. Subscriber numbers are falling as people can’t afford it/switch to illegal streaming so they’ll almost certainly be looking to cut costs.
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
No - it had changed before that. The Saudi stuff has taken it to the next level.Frostieballs wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 08:33The only thing that has changed that has been Saudi money.maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 03:17Yeah but that’s when Sky were doing 40 boxing shows a year and fighters weren’t getting paid far more than their commercial worth.Frostieballs wrote: ↑23 Jan 2025, 19:33
I think it worked ok in the 90’s when you had various promoters getting 10+ dates a year on Sky. (At various times Warren/Panix/Matchroom/Hennessy).
Seemed to be a bit of competition and more activity around the British Title scene.
The economics don’t work now.
It will be interesting to see the next 4/5 years at Sky Sports. Subscriber numbers are falling as people can’t afford it/switch to illegal streaming so they’ll almost certainly be looking to cut costs.
Before that hit, you still had British Champions on purses that weren’t huge.
PPV has always been an exception.
-
JamesPhilips
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6452
- Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
Oh fish eyes is very aggressive with threats and litigation. But Shalom is attacking Liam. Amer on basically just or asking for a rematch! Again and again and taking the p but still….. I can’t see a crime. What a scumbag.a force wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 04:33Isn’t this just the kind of thing Frank has done for nearly all his time in boxing?JamesPhilips wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 11:25 They’ll probably just offer the big PPVs from Turki. The recent PPVs have been available on multiple platforms.
Shalom is an absolutely clueless student gig organiser and it shows. He’s recently served Liam Cameron with a letter before action because of Liam’s tweets.
What a scum bag bully
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
I'm not entirely sure I follow any of this?Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 11:22 No need to be exclusive to any promotion.
I really hoped they didn’t after Matchroom left but they did.
Yeh they could have still done a deal with Boxxer, but no need to be exclusive with anyone.
They should be open. Pick and choose.
I mean the top promoters are tied with TV deals anyway.
But the likes of Hennessy, Wasserman etc.
Although I don’t mind having Channel 5 cards as well.
-
Frostieballs
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 1995
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
On what platform?maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 10:50No - it had changed before that. The Saudi stuff has taken it to the next level.Frostieballs wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 08:33The only thing that has changed that has been Saudi money.maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 03:17
Yeah but that’s when Sky were doing 40 boxing shows a year and fighters weren’t getting paid far more than their commercial worth.
The economics don’t work now.
It will be interesting to see the next 4/5 years at Sky Sports. Subscriber numbers are falling as people can’t afford it/switch to illegal streaming so they’ll almost certainly be looking to cut costs.
Before that hit, you still had British Champions on purses that weren’t huge.
PPV has always been an exception.
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
Dazn overpaid too, but the Fast Car was spending someone else's money
-
Frostieballs
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 1995
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: If SKY Dump Shalom And Want To Keep Showing Boxing.......
I think some of the flyweights/bantams of the 90’s earned decent money in that Sky era.maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 10:49Yeah. And often those flyweights headlining were in decent, competitive fights. Munyai brings back memories.mickey1975 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 04:23Some of those flyweight headliners were getting 5 grand if they were lucky.maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 03:17
Yeah but that’s when Sky were doing 40 boxing shows a year and fighters weren’t getting paid far more than their commercial worth.
The economics don’t work now.
It will be interesting to see the next 4/5 years at Sky Sports. Subscriber numbers are falling as people can’t afford it/switch to illegal streaming so they’ll almost certainly be looking to cut costs.
Think back to the likes of Nicky and Jason Booth, Napa, Kelly and Culshaw.
In real terms, I reckon their purses were higher than Harris and Butler’s recently.
That British Flyweight title fight was only picked up by DAZN in the week before.
I’d agree that the guys at the higher end may earn better now (Saudi/Dazn) but those below that have less opportunities.
30-40 consistent shows a year, with 12 fights each, allowed boxers to be very active, from prospect level through to Area, National and higher honours.
It seems now we can go weeks without a decent show, then a bumper bill comes along (which of course I love!).
Maybe rose tinted spectacles and I am getting old, but the overall scene seemed healthier in the 90’s.
In addition to the big fights (Hatton & Calzaghe), most Fridays (or Saturdays) you could look forward to seeing a decent British level title fight featuring decent names like Richard Williams, Wayne Alexander, Froch coming through, Damaen Kelly, Howard Eastman, Scott Harrison etc.
You’d get another title fight on the card and watch a couple of prospects on their journey.