Canelo v Crawford OFF??

[Les Norton]

Ring Magazine claims that a “source” has advised that the bout has been cancelled.
If true, that didn’t take long to fall over

[Cent0089]

Good, i was not fan of that fight. But i am worried now about Jake Paul BS

[squiggy]

Good. Just as a hypothetical fight it has sucked all the air out of the room long enough.

[JC]

Reckon they have access to a pretty reliable 'source' on this one.

[JCS]

Good, i was not fan of that fight. But i am worried now about Jake Paul BS

Why? It will be wonderful to see Jake Paul get beat down.

[gilgamesh]

Crawford needed this one a lot more than Canelo did. I wonder what caused it to fall through?

[cormack]

FFS it was never on !

[Cent0089]

Good, i was not fan of that fight. But i am worried now about Jake Paul BS

Why? It will be wonderful to see Jake Paul get beat down.

Yeah i wanna see it too, but it would be great if someone not as good as Canelo would do that damage

[Thomastearns]

Canelo will be 35 in July, the same age GGG was when they first fought.

However, he is no GGG.

He's clearly deteriorating and might feel a loss to the even older Crawford will destroy his legacy.

Therefore the Jake Paul fight makes more sense.

I wouldn't blame him, he's always been risk aversive.

But enough of the Canelo fanfare.

Ironically enough, although the Paul fight won't be adding anything to his legacy either, millions of fans would like to see him destroy Paul.

I'd be one of them.