Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46253
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by gilgamesh »

elmersalsa wrote: 26 May 2025, 13:37
gilgamesh wrote: 26 May 2025, 01:07
elmersalsa wrote: 26 May 2025, 01:04

Randy Turpin was kicking his ass in the rematch 3 months later in New York. The referee told Sugar Ray Robinson that he would give him one more round and stop the fight.

Robinson, in the moment of urgency and desperation, stops Turpin. He had to. He was losing big time!
Robinson was ahead on 2 cards, and even on the other at the time of the stoppage in the rematch with Turpin.
I don't know what the judges were watching. It would have been a robbery if the fight went to the cards. Why? Randy Turpin was putting it on him.

Plus, Sugar Ray Robinson was suffering a cut in one of his eyes. The referee gave him one more round and Robinson, in desperation mode, stops the clever Englishman in 10 rounds.
You're a real contrarian huh? You disagree just for the sake of disagreeing :lol:
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15097
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

He is unbelievable, isn't he? He just likes to ague in favor of his favorites no matter how stupid or hypocritical he is.

Somehow Pedroza was past his best when McGuigan beat him.
Duran is always past his best when he lost.
Somehow Duran needed more than 5 months for the Leonard rematch.

Yes Robinson who had way more fights that Pedroza and Duran, who had fought 6 times in the previous 30 days, was somehow in his prime when he fought Turpin? Just when you think he can't get any more stupid, he tops himself.

Also worth mentioning that we are supposed to count Roberto "forever a lightweight" Duran losses above lightweight. Because apparently he is the only fighter to ever move up in weight.

However, we are supposed to count Robinson's losses above welterweight. And he does see the hypocrisy in doing this! :lol:
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15652
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by elmersalsa »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 26 May 2025, 14:44 He is unbelievable, isn't he? He just likes to ague in favor of his favorites no matter how stupid or hypocritical he is.

Somehow Pedroza was past his best when McGuigan beat him.
Duran is always past his best when he lost.
Somehow Duran needed more than 5 months for the Leonard rematch.

Yes Robinson who had way more fights that Pedroza and Duran, who had fought 6 times in the previous 30 days, was somehow in his prime when he fought Turpin? Just when you think he can't get any more stupid, he tops himself.

Also worth mentioning that we are supposed to count Roberto "forever a lightweight" Duran losses above lightweight. Because apparently he is the only fighter to ever move up in weight.

However, we are supposed to count Robinson's losses above welterweight. And he does see the hypocrisy in doing this! :lol:
Eusebio Pedroza wasn't in his prime when he lost to overrated Barry McGuigan. Every champion cannot reign forever.

Was it a good win for McGuigan? Yes. Nobody is denying that. Give the credit where it's due. At least I am not saying that Pedroza didn't fight his fight when it comes to Sugar Ray Leonard. Do you believe that McGuigan beats Pedroza in his best day outside London, England? That was the only time and place where McGuigan beats Pedroza. In Pedroza's prime, Pedroza kicks his ass anywhere and any time. And it showed. When McGuigan traveled to Las Vegas to fight Stevie Cruz, what happened? And this McGuigan supposed to beat Pedroza any time and anywhere? Be realistic, man.

Roberto Duran was already in decline after the No Mas. He was in his 30s, an age that you got to be considering retiring. I have never said that he was invincible. But, who beat him at his weight class at lightweight? Only Esteban De Jesus. And Duran beats him twice after that.

Duran's management team wasn't desperate like Leonard's management team when they went to negotiate for the rematch behind Duran's back. Did Duran did that with De Jesus? No. Only a DESPERATE management team like Leonard's did that. And they are the only ones in boxing history to ever done it like that.

Why they didn't give Duran more time to train when he asked for it? If the Leonard management team were real sportsmen, they would give Duran more time to train. That's why that second fight wasn't even about sportsmanship but a fix to get the title back to America. That's all it was. America gotta be the greatest! :lol:


I have never said that we have to count Sugar Ray Robinson's losses above welterweight. Who told you that? What are you a damn liar, man? I said that Robinson got whupped by the Englishman Randy Turpin in London, England.

Wasn't Robinson in his prime when he lost to Turpin? Yes!
Did Turpin kicked his azz? Yes!
Was Turpin beating the crap out of Robinson three months later in NYC? Yes. The referee was going to stop the fight. Robinson had a cut.

That's not hipocrisy. I called like I see it.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15097
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Editor Notes:

Duran was not in his 30s when he lost to Leonard. He was just 29.
Pedroza was just 29 when he lost to Mcguigan.
Robinson was 30 when he lost to Turpin.
30 is in fact older than 29.

Duran had 5 months between the first two Leonard fights.
By coincidence, Leonard had the exact same amount of time. Duran's management team could not have made the fight happen after "only" 5 months if Duran did not want them to. Duran had to sign the contract for the fight to happen. he could have waited 7 more months.

elmer seldom makes any sense.

Robinson had just 9 days off before the first Turpin fight.
9 days is fact a lot less time that 5 months.
Robinson had won the middleweight title 5 months before losing to Turpin.

Robinson had more fights before he fought Turpin than Pedroza had before he fought McGuigan, and Duran had before he fought Leonard. combined.

elmer is a big fan of Pedroza and of course Duran. He hates Leonard and Robinson. Claims to be a fan of Leonard but has said that he isn't a real fighter nor a sportsman.

elmer recently said we should not count Robinson's losses at middleweight. elmer has gone on and about it the Turpin-Robinson fights. The fight were at.... middleweight.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15652
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by elmersalsa »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 27 May 2025, 21:09 Editor Notes:

Duran was not in his 30s when he lost to Leonard. He was just 29.
Pedroza was just 29 when he lost to Mcguigan.
Robinson was 30 when he lost to Turpin.
30 is in fact older than 29.

Duran had 5 months between the first two Leonard fights.
By coincidence, Leonard had the exact same amount of time. Duran's management team could not have made the fight happen after "only" 5 months if Duran did not want them to. Duran had to sign the contract for the fight to happen. he could have waited 7 more months.

elmer seldom makes any sense.

Robinson had just 9 days off before the first Turpin fight.
9 days is fact a lot less time that 5 months.
Robinson had won the middleweight title 5 months before losing to Turpin.

Robinson had more fights before he fought Turpin than Pedroza had before he fought McGuigan, and Duran had before he fought Leonard. combined.

elmer is a big fan of Pedroza and of course Duran. He hates Leonard and Robinson. Claims to be a fan of Leonard but has said that he isn't a real fighter nor a sportsman.

elmer recently said we should not count Robinson's losses at middleweight. elmer has gone on and about it the Turpin-Robinson fights. The fight were at.... middleweight.
Roberto Duran was SOLD AND BETRAYED BY HIS OWN MANAGER, Carlos Eleta, for $8 million dollars. A type of cash that he thought he would never ever see again. Duran wasn't even around in the negotiation table. Do you think that Duran would have signed a fight that quickly in the midst of his party mode? No. I don't think that nobody would.

But, the fault was by his own manager. He got baited by $8 million dollars and the No Mas fiasco was history. All because of his betrayal.

Leonard's management team was superb. Never in the history of the sport, a management team has gone with a promoter to another country were the guy got the title and desperately so, offered a big amount of cash for a rematch. That has never been done before nor after in the history of the sport of boxing. Unbelievable!

Believe me, I don't hate that strategy one bit. It worked in their favor big time! If Sugar Ray would have been another fighter, that rematch would have never happened that soon. Not in 5 months.

Eusebio Pedroza's age was never truly verified. Some reports say that he was 32. Some say he was 29 by the time he fought Barry McGuigan.

But, you don't want to consider that Pedroza made 20 title defenses already. That's a lot of title defenses. Especially at featherweight. He had to lose some day. Nobody reigns forever. He had 7 years with the title, Alp.

And it showed that McGuigan was overrated after that. He couldn't help the title for a long time. The next year, a unknown American boxer, Stevie Cruz, gave McGuigan a shellacking in Las Vegas. That means that fighting in his comfort zone of Great Britain was the way that it looked how McGuigan wins. He beat Juan LaPorte, Bernard Taylor and Pedroza in London, England.

Would he beat those three guys outside of England? Probably not. Cruz was inferior to those three guys. Who was Stevie Cruz?

Most of Sugar Ray Robinson's losses were above middleweight. He lost as a welterweight for the first time when he was fighting a middleweight named Jake LaMotta. He had 18 losses at middleweight. Two of those Middleweight losses were in his prime. Duran didn't lose twice at lightweight. He lost once. And once at Welterweight of the dubious loss against Leonard. After that, and when he just turned 30, he started losing in bigger weight classes.

I don't hate Sugar Ray Leonard. That's one of my favorite boxers. But, he wasn't better than Duran in my book. I don't hate Robinson, either.

But, the fans had a total misconception about him as the most complete boxer ever when he was not. Like I have said. I gave Expug 10 or more boxers that in my view, were much more complete than Robinson. Leonard was one of them.

I have also stated many times in this forum that if Leonard or Duran fights Robinson at welterweight, I would pick Leonard or Duran to beat Robinson at welterweight.

At middleweight, being not biased, I would pick Robinson over Duran and Leonard. Duran and Leonard were not dominant above welterweight.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46253
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by gilgamesh »

Honestly I've never bought Duran's "I didn't have time to train" excuse for the Leonard rematch.

As Alp has mentioned he had the exact amount of time to train as Leonard did. The fact that he was out partying, and living it up doesn't excuse losing. It means Leonard was more Professional than him, and took his career and training more seriously.

Leonard also fought a much smarter fight in the rematch. He boxed Duran in the rematch. He fought him in the 1st fight.

If he had fought with the same strategy in the 1st fight, there's a good chance he would've won that one as well to be honest, although as a bigger fan of Duran, I'm glad that the 1st fight played out the way it did.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15652
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by elmersalsa »

gilgamesh wrote: 28 May 2025, 02:10 Honestly I've never bought Duran's "I didn't have time to train" excuse for the Leonard rematch.

As Alp has mentioned he had the exact amount of time to train as Leonard did. The fact that he was out partying, and living it up doesn't excuse losing. It means Leonard was more Professional than him, and took his career and training more seriously.

Leonard also fought a much smarter fight in the rematch. He boxed Duran in the rematch. He fought him in the 1st fight.

If he had fought with the same strategy in the 1st fight, there's a good chance he would've won that one as well to be honest, although as a bigger fan of Duran, I'm glad that the 1st fight played out the way it did.
Duran got BETRAYED and SOLD by his own manager, Carlos Eleta. That was an inside job for a fix to get the title back to Sugar Ray Leonard, America's Golden Boy.

That second fight was never about sportsmanship. For the American boxing media, it was UNACCEPTABLE for a Latin boxer, who was considered a bully, with no education and no English language whatsoever, to be the face of boxing. America got to be the greatest. That's all that No Mas was about.

Do you really believe that Duran, a smart fighter like him would have signed up for that rematch so soon? Do you? No smart person would. But, he got BETRAYED big time! And No Mas was history.

Why they didn't give Duran to train properly to be in even terms? They declined him to train.

You guys talk like if the guy didn't had the right to enjoy and party from the fruits of his labor. He deserved to celebrate like a party animal. Why not? It's in the Bible written that you have to celebrate with all your heart and soul of the fruits of your hard labor.

Duran kicked his ass! That "didn't fight his fight" for Sugar Ray was baloney. He lost. He got an ass kicking when both were at their very best. On even terms.

Duran: the greatest boxer pound per pound of the last 60 years! Who wants to disagree, wave your hand and explain why.
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6050
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by goose 5 »

Eleta was so wealthy I'm doubtful that 8 million bucks would have made him flinch.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46253
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by gilgamesh »

elmersalsa wrote: 28 May 2025, 19:11
gilgamesh wrote: 28 May 2025, 02:10 Honestly I've never bought Duran's "I didn't have time to train" excuse for the Leonard rematch.

As Alp has mentioned he had the exact amount of time to train as Leonard did. The fact that he was out partying, and living it up doesn't excuse losing. It means Leonard was more Professional than him, and took his career and training more seriously.

Leonard also fought a much smarter fight in the rematch. He boxed Duran in the rematch. He fought him in the 1st fight.

If he had fought with the same strategy in the 1st fight, there's a good chance he would've won that one as well to be honest, although as a bigger fan of Duran, I'm glad that the 1st fight played out the way it did.
Duran got BETRAYED and SOLD by his own manager, Carlos Eleta. That was an inside job for a fix to get the title back to Sugar Ray Leonard, America's Golden Boy.

That second fight was never about sportsmanship. For the American boxing media, it was UNACCEPTABLE for a Latin boxer, who was considered a bully, with no education and no English language whatsoever, to be the face of boxing. America got to be the greatest. That's all that No Mas was about.

Do you really believe that Duran, a smart fighter like him would have signed up for that rematch so soon? Do you? No smart person would. But, he got BETRAYED big time! And No Mas was history.

Why they didn't give Duran to train properly to be in even terms? They declined him to train.

You guys talk like if the guy didn't had the right to enjoy and party from the fruits of his labor. He deserved to celebrate like a party animal. Why not? It's in the Bible written that you have to celebrate with all your heart and soul of the fruits of your hard labor.

Duran kicked his ass! That "didn't fight his fight" for Sugar Ray was baloney. He lost. He got an ass kicking when both were at their very best. On even terms.

Duran: the greatest boxer pound per pound of the last 60 years! Who wants to disagree, wave your hand and explain why.
Do you have an excuse for all of Duran's other losses too? Duran surely does.

Nobody ever REALLY beat him. He just beat himself 16 times.

If you didn't train for a fight, and you lost it. That's not an excuse. Taking your training seriously is part of being a Professional. If your excuse for losing a fight is "I didn't train for it". Then guess what? Your opponent was better than you because he did.
Jaywheel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2694
Joined: 19 Mar 2008, 12:14

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by Jaywheel »

elmersalsa wrote: 23 May 2025, 18:24
Expug wrote: 22 May 2025, 18:31 You also say above that he was top ten in history and that you can name ten guys that were better in terms of skills. Confusing.
Having better skills doesn't mean he had better accomplishments. I could name 10 fighters or more that were much more complete than Sugar Ray Robinson. He looked terrific at THAT TIME. In an era that nobody saw someone else like that with that speed and power.

Robinson couldn't fight inside. His punches? He threw them up too wide. Muhammad Ali, that wasn't a great inside fighter, was better inside fighter than Robinson.

Let me give you the ten names, plus more:
Eusebio Pedroza
Salvador Sanchez
Roberto Duran
Mike McCallum
Sugar Ray Leonard
James Toney
Eder Jofre
Marvelous Marvin Hagler
Wilfredo Gomez
Miguel "Happy" Lora
Floyd Mayweather, Jr.
Ezzard Charles
Charley Burley

These fighters had complete games. They could box, slug it out, fight inside, had speed of hands and feet, counter punching abilities, ring generalship, poise, punching power and did it better than the Sugar Man.

Now, when we talk about accomplishments, Robinson did better than all of the guys in this list. Even though, he didn't fight the best black fighters of his era. And there were plenty of them: Cocoa Kid, Holman Williams, Charley Burley, Archie Moore, Ezzard Charles, Eddie Booker, Ike Williams, Beau Jack, Bob Montgomery and others that I can name.

He looked the other way, especially against Burley and Charles. He ignored them completely. Robinson feasted fighting clumsy, rugged and limited white boxers.

Sure, he went some 90 wins plus without a defeat. His record would have had much more losses if he fought these terrific black boxers. That is why I see him as overrated in my view.
:lol: :lol:
Expug
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4446
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 18:40

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by Expug »

And not one of those guys were more skilled than Ray.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46253
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by gilgamesh »

I guess we've figured out that elmer must be from Panama. Nobody on Earth. Anywhere. Has ever suggested that Pedroza was more skilled than Ray Robinson.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15652
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by elmersalsa »

goose 5 wrote: 28 May 2025, 21:27 Eleta was so wealthy I'm doubtful that 8 million bucks would have made him flinch.
The greedy ones always get greedier. Eight million wasn't enough for him. He totally BETRAYED and SOLD his champion.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15652
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by elmersalsa »

gilgamesh wrote: 29 May 2025, 01:17
elmersalsa wrote: 28 May 2025, 19:11
gilgamesh wrote: 28 May 2025, 02:10 Honestly I've never bought Duran's "I didn't have time to train" excuse for the Leonard rematch.

As Alp has mentioned he had the exact amount of time to train as Leonard did. The fact that he was out partying, and living it up doesn't excuse losing. It means Leonard was more Professional than him, and took his career and training more seriously.

Leonard also fought a much smarter fight in the rematch. He boxed Duran in the rematch. He fought him in the 1st fight.

If he had fought with the same strategy in the 1st fight, there's a good chance he would've won that one as well to be honest, although as a bigger fan of Duran, I'm glad that the 1st fight played out the way it did.
Duran got BETRAYED and SOLD by his own manager, Carlos Eleta. That was an inside job for a fix to get the title back to Sugar Ray Leonard, America's Golden Boy.

That second fight was never about sportsmanship. For the American boxing media, it was UNACCEPTABLE for a Latin boxer, who was considered a bully, with no education and no English language whatsoever, to be the face of boxing. America got to be the greatest. That's all that No Mas was about.

Do you really believe that Duran, a smart fighter like him would have signed up for that rematch so soon? Do you? No smart person would. But, he got BETRAYED big time! And No Mas was history.

Why they didn't give Duran to train properly to be in even terms? They declined him to train.

You guys talk like if the guy didn't had the right to enjoy and party from the fruits of his labor. He deserved to celebrate like a party animal. Why not? It's in the Bible written that you have to celebrate with all your heart and soul of the fruits of your hard labor.

Duran kicked his ass! That "didn't fight his fight" for Sugar Ray was baloney. He lost. He got an ass kicking when both were at their very best. On even terms.

Duran: the greatest boxer pound per pound of the last 60 years! Who wants to disagree, wave your hand and explain why.
Do you have an excuse for all of Duran's other losses too? Duran surely does.

Nobody ever REALLY beat him. He just beat himself 16 times.

If you didn't train for a fight, and you lost it. That's not an excuse. Taking your training seriously is part of being a Professional. If your excuse for losing a fight is "I didn't train for it". Then guess what? Your opponent was better than you because he did.
I don't have an excuse for nobody. Roberto Duran when he lost to Esteban De Jesus, I gave him credit. He was the only guy that beat Duran in Duran's prime.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46253
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by gilgamesh »

But Leonard beating Duran 6 months after his career best win wasn't beating a Prime Duran huh?

How convenient of an excuse. The guy was 6 months removed from his biggest win and 9 years away from his 2nd biggest win, but it don't count somehow...basically because your guy lost and you want to believe his excuse.

There are no excuses in Boxing. If you were fit enough to step into the ring. You were fit enough to fight.

Leonard beat him decisively in the rematch. I wish it weren't so too, believe me. But it is, and all the excuses in the world won't ever change it or diminish it.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15652
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by elmersalsa »

gilgamesh wrote: 29 May 2025, 21:16 But Leonard beating Duran 6 months after his career best win wasn't beating a Prime Duran huh?

How convenient of an excuse. The guy was 6 months removed from his biggest win and 9 years away from his 2nd biggest win, but it don't count somehow...basically because your guy lost and you want to believe his excuse.

There are no excuses in Boxing. If you were fit enough to step into the ring. You were fit enough to fight.

Leonard beat him decisively in the rematch. I wish it weren't so too, believe me. But it is, and all the excuses in the world won't ever change it or diminish it.
Sugar Ray Leonard beat a prime Roberto Duran. It was a DUBIOUS win. Esteban De Jesus win over Duran is much more credible. More satisfying. No excuses there.

That No Mas fiasco was a fix to get the title back to America. Sugar Ray's management team was so desperate that they flew to Panama City, Panama to negotiate with Duran's manager Carlos Eleta, all done behind Duran's back.

Eleta got greedy and sold his fighter to the Devil for $8 million dollars. He never discussed it with his champion, he just saw dollar signs. Duran wasn't even around in the negotiations. And when he did ask for more time, he was declined.

That's not sportsmanship. If it was, you let the guy train and be ready on even terms. The first fight was on even terms. Both trained for the fight. Both were ready. The best one won.

De Jesus trained for the fight. So did Duran. The best one won. I didn't see Duran's management team travelling to Puerto Rico and be desperate for a rematch.

That's the difference. It was DUBIOUS all the way.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15097
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

What a load of crap.
Expug
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4446
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 18:40

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by Expug »

Doesn’t make it at all dubious from the Leonard standpoint. If Mike Trainer and co. Outmaneuvered Durans management team, and Roberto was out of shape, that’s on him and them. And the only sportsmanship there is in the fight game is after the fights over. Handshake, hug for the opponent, whatever. Other than that it’s dog eat dog get any advantage you can. Harsh but true.
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6050
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by goose 5 »

Wasn't Duran injured in a car crash before the first DeJesus bout ?
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15652
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by elmersalsa »

goose 5 wrote: 30 May 2025, 19:30 Wasn't Duran injured in a car crash before the first DeJesus bout ?
Yeah. But, he lost fair and square. Roberto Duran was in shape. Esteban De Jesus was in shape. Both trained for the fight. It was on even terms. DeJesus won.

But, De Jesus doesn't get enough credit for the win. I don't understand that. He was the only one who beat Duran in Duran's best weight and prime.

Sugar Ray desperately won the fight because the other was in still party mode. That's the difference.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15652
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by elmersalsa »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 30 May 2025, 15:09 What a load of crap.
It looks like you can't handle the truth. I can see why.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15652
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by elmersalsa »

Expug wrote: 30 May 2025, 16:12 Doesn’t make it at all dubious from the Leonard standpoint. If Mike Trainer and co. Outmaneuvered Durans management team, and Roberto was out of shape, that’s on him and them. And the only sportsmanship there is in the fight game is after the fights over. Handshake, hug for the opponent, whatever. Other than that it’s dog eat dog get any advantage you can. Harsh but true.
It was DUBIOUS from the beginning. Never in the history of boxing, a manager goes to another country to negotiate a rematch so desperately.

Never in the history of boxing, a management team had the leeway and the leverage to lure the opposite manager to sign up for a rematch with an offer so difficult to refuse.

The guy sold Roberto Duran for $8 million dollars!

Come on! What management team has ever done that in the history of boxing?

Why they didn't let the champion train like he should? Why he wasn't given any more time to be on even terms?

Because it was a fix to get the title back to America. And it worked.

If Sugar Ray Leonard was so good and with great sportsmanship, he lets the champion train and let's see who is the best.

But flying to another country to do the dirt? That is not honorable.

That No Mas fiasco was nothing but a betrayal, humiliation and payback from desperate businessmen of both sides.
Expug
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4446
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 18:40

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by Expug »

Duran is the fighter. He can say no. He doesn’t have to go along with any of it. He signs the contract or he doesn’t. If he’s incapable of making any decisions about what he will and won’t do than it’s on him. I’d be curious to know if there was a rematch clause in the original contract. It would be unusual in that situation not to have one given the nature of Leonard’s management team. I believe that I did here the quick turnaround to a rematch was negotiated afterwards, regardless, one guy allowed himself to get out of shape and put all decisions in the hands of a guy who you suggest is a crook. Either situation is on Duran. If malfeasance happened, it happened because he allowed it to.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15652
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by elmersalsa »

Expug wrote: 30 May 2025, 20:28 Duran is the fighter. He can say no. He doesn’t have to go along with any of it. He signs the contract or he doesn’t. If he’s incapable of making any decisions about what he will and won’t do than it’s on him. I’d be curious to know if there was a rematch clause in the original contract. It would be unusual in that situation not to have one given the nature of Leonard’s management team. I believe that I did here the quick turnaround to a rematch was negotiated afterwards, regardless, one guy allowed himself to get out of shape and put all decisions in the hands of a guy who you suggest is a crook. Either situation is on Duran. If malfeasance happened, it happened because he allowed it to.
Roberto Duran was forced to fight. If he didn't, he was going to get sued big time by the promoter Don King.

Carlos Eleta already had the money ($8 million dollars) in the bank. He saw the money. He saw the opportunity. He took it and didn't care if Duran was there or not.

GREEDINESS makes not honorable mention do some things.

Do you believe if Duran was in the negotiations table, he would have signed up for the fight so soon on his party mode? No one would, neither would Duran. His greedy and crooked manager signed behind Duran's back and The No Mas is history.

Esteban De Jesus didn't had to do all that. Wait a minute. He is the only guy that truly and really beat the Hands of Stone, at the Hands of Stone's best weight and in prime.


It really was sad by both parties. How they worked behind the champion for greed. This one's one of the greatest betrayals in boxing history.

REEDINESS makes
Expug
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4446
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 18:40

Re: Greater Fighter: Harry Greb or Sugar Ray Robinson?

Post by Expug »

So it’s your stance that Duran had no say so whatsoever, he had to fight. And, he came into the fight out of shape, quit in the eighth round, and he’s not responsible for any of this. It’s all a sham to bring the title back to America? In other words, it’s everyone else’s fault? That’s your position?
Post Reply