burns v murray

puncher1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5
Joined: 08 Jul 2006, 05:29

burns v murray

Post by puncher1 »

i hear murray has pulled out of the fight with burns,so much with all the hype that mitchell and murray get all the time ,seems they just want to fight bums and talk a good fight.that now leaves burns to fight carl johannson,it should be a cracker as they are 2 brave lads not like the others.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Post by Wales »

I wonder how much the behind the scenes problems affected Murrays last performance? Although I didnt see the fight he looked battered at ringside during the Witter fight, and I hear his performance was non too clever.

I dont think Murray just wants to fight bums though, mendoza was a very live and dangerous opponent. And I suspect the injuroes from his last fight will keep him out of the Burns fight.
kevin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by kevin »

Murray got pretty marked up in his last fight so I am not surprised.

Johannson fights Femi Fehintola next
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Post by Wales »

I think carl wins that one. Femi dosent appear to have the power to keep Johansen at bay.
chris s
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 02 Jun 2004, 08:56

Post by chris s »

Heard Murray has pulled out of the fight completely and wont even take it when fit. I think that means he can't fight for the British title for another year.

Perhaps Wellington can clear up.
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Post by TerribleTerry »

chris s wrote:Heard Murray has pulled out of the fight completely and wont even take it when fit. I think that means he can't fight for the British title for another year.

Perhaps Wellington can clear up.
Wellington only posts on here when its press release time..I wouldnt hold my breathe waiting for clarification.

what happened to all the talk of "I will break you in two in Manchester"?...

very disappointing.

All this managerial two'ing and fro'ing has certainly affected murray's progress and I for one am very disappointed this fight has been cast aside. I was a potentially excellent clash of young talents.

whats the big plan for murray now I wonder? :-?
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

Big dissapointment, would of been interesting to see Murrays step up
boxerrob2005
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 190
Joined: 27 Apr 2005, 10:16

Post by boxerrob2005 »

really not surprised. so predictable this would happen. why would you fight so close to a major showdown.? so u can have a reason to pull out the fight. okay murray has a bad black eye but he shouldnt have taken that fight and the black eye is his excuse to get out.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6639
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Post by THEBUTCH »

Very disappointing. I think team Murray have some explaining to do.
emma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1421
Joined: 20 Mar 2006, 12:28

Post by emma »

Well as long as Burns still fights i dont mind, i like Burns. :TU:
glahn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 992
Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 13:29

Post by glahn »

I really like Burns too. I hope they get a decent opponent for him.
jomothepure
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2660
Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 08:43

Post by jomothepure »

Ditto, although given the short notice I fear it may be an 8-rder against a fairly non-descript opponent. Or he could be pulled out altogether and be given a shot at the comm belt or something on the Arthur card - give him the opportunity to be the champion-elect rather than the unsung challenger if you know what I mean.

I wonder where this leaves the British title though. Does this leave Burns a clear path to fight Johanneson, presuming he gets past Fehintola, or will the bbbofc make him fight an eliminator or some sort nevertheless?
emma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1421
Joined: 20 Mar 2006, 12:28

Post by emma »

jomothepure wrote:Ditto, although given the short notice I fear it may be an 8-rder against a fairly non-descript opponent. Or he could be pulled out altogether and be given a shot at the comm belt or something on the Arthur card - give him the opportunity to be the champion-elect rather than the unsung challenger if you know what I mean.

I wonder where this leaves the British title though. Does this leave Burns a clear path to fight Johanneson, presuming he gets past Fehintola, or will the bbbofc make him fight an eliminator or some sort nevertheless?
I hope he dont pull out or they'll be no one worth watching on the undercard.Nelsons out and then Burns. :(
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Post by Wales »

Nothing worth watching? did you miss the first Hobson Macca scrap?
emma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1421
Joined: 20 Mar 2006, 12:28

Post by emma »

Wales wrote:Nothing worth watching? did you miss the first Hobson Macca scrap?
yes i did actually.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Post by Wales »

Could make an argument of it being domestic scrap of the year i'd say. Super fight. Hobson has more prep this time too.
puncher1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5
Joined: 08 Jul 2006, 05:29

Post by puncher1 »

burns is off the manchester bill,all that training for nothing because murray bottled it,he fought 2 weeks ago so how is he not ready,strange one this,he should be reprimanded for waisting peoples time
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Post by leforge »

This bill changed greatly since originally published no Burns V Murray , no Nelson V Enzo, no Foster V Morris anymore i wonder
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Hennessy's fault trying to sell his own bill more. :evil:

Burns would of won this too.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Post by leforge »

Is super featherweight Murry division he should fight in
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Post by TerribleTerry »

leforge wrote:This bill changed greatly since originally published no Burns V Murray , no Nelson V Enzo, no Foster V Morris anymore i wonder
Its an SN card - the pioneers, and greatest exponents, of the 'bait n switch'

(this side of de la hoya and his annual con job on HBO and their mexican independance day date)
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27497
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

I think Burns would have won..... Murray is too easy to hit and Burns is tough. I think he would have won via UD. It would have been a cracker though.

I hope Burns hasn't missed out on a pay day and Frank can draft in an opponent.

I do worry if Murray can make Super Feather comfortably, although last time he was only 1/2 lbs over.
emma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1421
Joined: 20 Mar 2006, 12:28

Post by emma »

Lets be honest i dont know why we're surprised, i mean this is a Warren bill after all.When does the card ever stay to its original list?. :roll:
Top Dog
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 368
Joined: 03 May 2006, 15:03

Post by Top Dog »

Surprise, surprise. How often do we see that on a Frankie show? nearly every time! Fair enough, call offs happen, but it seems to me that he comes up with a load of mouth watering fights only for them to call off when most of the tickets are sold. Bad luck or good planning??
Pure diddy.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Hearing good things about Burns and some reckon he can go further than British Level.
Post Reply