Kell Brook & BKFC

Post Reply
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102915
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Kell Brook offered shock comeback fight after three-year layoff

Kell Brook could be set for a return to the fight game over three years on from beating Amir Khan

Former world champion Kell Brook has been offered a shock return to the ring.

Brook, 39, has not fought since stopping Amir Khan in the sixth round of their grudge match in February 2022.

But he could be set to make a comeback after his long-term trainer Dominic Ingle revealed he has been presented with the opportunity to move into bare-knuckle boxing.

Ingle told Boxing King Media: “He’s been offered money to be in the bare-knuckle boxing.

“Frankie Gavin has done it, Liam Williams might be doing it, James DeGale (is doing it].”

Brook may be tempted by a return to the ring, but Gavin’s bare-knuckle debut in June showed how dangerous the sport can be.

Ex-amateur world champion Gavin, who challenged Brook for his welterweight world title in 2015, was stopped inside a minute by Jack Dugdale on his Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship debut.

Meanwhile, Olympic gold medallist and former world champion DeGale is due to make his own bare-knuckle bow against Australia’s Matt Floyd on September 27.

DeGale was last seen losing to Chris Eubank Jr back in February 2019 and announced his retirement from boxing shortly afterwards.

Brook held the IBF welterweight belt between 2014 and 2017 after ripping the title away from American star Shawn Porter.

He made three successful defences against Jo Jo Dan, Gavin and Kevin Bizier before jumping up to middleweight to challenge Gennady Golovkin.

Brook fell short against the Kazakh knockout artist and then lost his title to Errol Spence when he returned to 147lbs.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5447
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by forcefraser »

Kelly ain't no cobbles man is he?
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102915
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

he needs to stay the f away from Bare knuckle.

he's had both his eye sockets done.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23057
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by mickey1975 »

It won't happen. One Boxing King interview with Ingle generates loads of bullshit articles. They're usually just throwaway comments.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32907
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by Boxerbeetle »

I bet every ex-pro has been “offered” to do bare-knuckle, not sure what the point of this article is? :maybe:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23057
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by mickey1975 »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 03 Sep 2025, 06:49 I bet every ex-pro has been “offered” to do bare-knuckle, not sure what the point of this article is? :maybe:
None. It's just spam.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16841
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by Nightmare Roy »

forcefraser wrote: 03 Sep 2025, 05:36 Kelly ain't no cobbles man is he?
He's no feather duster man
MasterG
Super Featherweight
Posts: 7601
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 16:45

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by MasterG »

Maybe needs to fight to put his kids through private education.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5447
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by forcefraser »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 03 Sep 2025, 10:05
forcefraser wrote: 03 Sep 2025, 05:36 Kelly ain't no cobbles man is he?
He's no feather duster man
He's no duster, true, but he ain't a true cobbles man like BJS

I know his eye sockets were busted up twice, but against Spence he sat out the count. Jacked.

No cobbles man would ever jack, he'd rather die. Get carried out the ring brudda
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1799
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by tigermoth87 »

Kell Brook wasted his career. 40 wins, only one good name in there--Porter. Instead he wasted time fighting Donut Dan and Frankie Gavin.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5447
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by forcefraser »

tigermoth87 wrote: 04 Sep 2025, 09:04 Kell Brook wasted his career. 40 wins, only one good name in there--Porter. Instead he wasted time fighting Donut Dan and Frankie Gavin.
Absolutely. One of the most padded records of a supposedly elite fighter.

Razor thin Porter victory, Senchenko and Matty Hatton? Top 3 wins?
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102915
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

forcefraser wrote: 04 Sep 2025, 09:53
tigermoth87 wrote: 04 Sep 2025, 09:04 Kell Brook wasted his career. 40 wins, only one good name in there--Porter. Instead he wasted time fighting Donut Dan and Frankie Gavin.
Absolutely. One of the most padded records of a supposedly elite fighter.

Razor thin Porter victory, Senchenko and Matty Hatton? Top 3 wins?
Who ranks him as elite?
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9218
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by Controversial »

I wouldn't say wasted his career, he took the big fights, GGG (35-0), Spence (21-0) and Crawford (36-0) and came unstuck.
Going in to BKB would be a mistake.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102915
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Controversial wrote: 04 Sep 2025, 10:04 I wouldn't say wasted his career, he took the big fights, GGG (35-0), Spence (21-0) and Crawford (36-0) and came unstuck.
Going in to BKB would be a mistake.
by time he fought Bud, he was finished.

He went for a cheque.

I always wonder, what if, he just fought Vargas in a unification fight..

what would he have done then? he probably would have lost the belts to Spence anyway, cus that was his next mandatory anyway.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17005
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by keithmoonhangover »

BKFC will be happy with the free publicity whether Kell fights for them or not.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9218
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by Controversial »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 04 Sep 2025, 10:24
Controversial wrote: 04 Sep 2025, 10:04 I wouldn't say wasted his career, he took the big fights, GGG (35-0), Spence (21-0) and Crawford (36-0) and came unstuck.
Going in to BKB would be a mistake.
by time he fought Bud, he was finished.

He went for a cheque.

Don’t blame him, they are a long time retired
Switch hitter
Super Welterweight
Posts: 590
Joined: 09 Aug 2014, 07:43

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by Switch hitter »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 04 Sep 2025, 10:24
Controversial wrote: 04 Sep 2025, 10:04 I wouldn't say wasted his career, he took the big fights, GGG (35-0), Spence (21-0) and Crawford (36-0) and came unstuck.
Going in to BKB would be a mistake.
by time he fought Bud, he was finished.

He went for a cheque.

I always wonder, what if, he just fought Vargas in a unification fight..

what would he have done then? he probably would have lost the belts to Spence anyway, cus that was his next mandatory anyway.
If he didn't move up to fight GGG he wouldn't have lost to Spence
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102915
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Switch hitter wrote: 05 Sep 2025, 08:20 If he didn't move up to fight GGG he wouldn't have lost to Spence
you think?

how would he have won?

stoppage? decision?
Switch hitter
Super Welterweight
Posts: 590
Joined: 09 Aug 2014, 07:43

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by Switch hitter »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 05 Sep 2025, 09:17
Switch hitter wrote: 05 Sep 2025, 08:20 If he didn't move up to fight GGG he wouldn't have lost to Spence
you think?

how would he have won?

stoppage? decision?
Points I think close but would have won.
Too much going up then down in weight. It killed him going back down to 147 ....
Bigdogsnose
Middleweight
Posts: 1471
Joined: 02 Dec 2013, 08:36

Re: Kell Brook & BKFC

Post by Bigdogsnose »

Switch hitter wrote: 05 Sep 2025, 14:30
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 05 Sep 2025, 09:17
Switch hitter wrote: 05 Sep 2025, 08:20 If he didn't move up to fight GGG he wouldn't have lost to Spence
you think?

how would he have won?

stoppage? decision?
Points I think close but would have won.
Too much going up then down in weight. It killed him going back down to 147 ....
He did look very good in the early rounds. Was showing spence a few things he hadnt seen before. But Spence was always investing in the body. I would have loved to seen it pre ggg, so there was no doubt.

Kells resume should have been better, but i do think a lot was down to circumstance. Winning the IBF ended up a bit of a curse with their pathetic rankings. In his prime, 2013/2014, floyd and pac were starting decline, and he'd have given bradley and thurman a good fight, real 50/50s. He'd have been competive with any WW then.
Post Reply