Steffy Bull

Floydendizer
Welterweight
Posts: 196
Joined: 17 Jul 2016, 11:03

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by Floydendizer »

Steffy only serving 40 % of sentence + knock of remand he’ll be out in 3 1/2 years
No comeback with the pro game & will probably lose all his assets now .
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7273
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by Oiky »

Nobody wants a 10 but these cases are often a lot worse than that
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3222
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by smiling assassin »

He’s had a right touch only getting a 10. In that game a lay down is part and parcel, The pays bang on but the holidays are shit
Frostieballs
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 2020
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by Frostieballs »

margaret thatcher wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 03:36 ^ not the boxer stuart hall, for those unaware of the case
Definitely not! Rather the one of ‘It’s a Knockout’ fame.
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3170
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by deadpan »

veriton wrote: 05 Sep 2025, 14:04
Boxerbeetle wrote: 05 Sep 2025, 13:19 10 years is ridiculous. 5 years should be the absolute max for any drug related crime.
destroying lives and communities for a pound note is about as low as it gets. that's before you think about the violence and fear that keeps the machine going. no sympathy.
THIS.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16836
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by Nightmare Roy »

SeanBrennan wrote: 05 Sep 2025, 14:03 He wasn’t very subtle, £100k car and a council house. Solid low-key tactics. Could have joined MI5
Had he had his teef done in Turkey and took regular holidays to Dubai as well? Pretty much a prerequisite for all low to mid level dealers. :lol:
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9903
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by SeanBrennan »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 12:01
SeanBrennan wrote: 05 Sep 2025, 14:03 He wasn’t very subtle, £100k car and a council house. Solid low-key tactics. Could have joined MI5
Had he had his teef done in Turkey and took regular holidays to Dubai as well? Pretty much a prerequisite for all low to mid level dealers. :lol:
I think so, I think they give you a longer sentence if you have not had massive new gnashers.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9903
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by SeanBrennan »

Floydendizer wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 04:33 Steffy only serving 40 % of sentence + knock of remand he’ll be out in 3 1/2 years
No comeback with the pro game & will probably lose all his assets now .
POCA will take everything
Frostieballs
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 2020
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by Frostieballs »

deadpan wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 10:24
veriton wrote: 05 Sep 2025, 14:04
Boxerbeetle wrote: 05 Sep 2025, 13:19 10 years is ridiculous. 5 years should be the absolute max for any drug related crime.
destroying lives and communities for a pound note is about as low as it gets. that's before you think about the violence and fear that keeps the machine going. no sympathy.
THIS.
I get that, but make the comparison with Stuart Hall (above).
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9903
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by SeanBrennan »

I think we can all agree that sex offenders receive extremely lenient sentences disproportionate to the harm they cause.

As for the length of sentences drug dealers should receive, I have no idea. I do not think the market for their wares is ever going to decline, and the war on drugs is ever going to have any chance of being 'won'. I have lost half siblings and lots of cousins to addiction. The dealers never put the drug in their arm or nose, but are clearly part of the problem. It a very sad state of affairs for all parties.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32904
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by Boxerbeetle »

SeanBrennan wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 13:35 I think we can all agree that sex offenders receive extremely lenient sentences disproportionate to the harm they cause.

As for the length of sentences drug dealers should receive, I have no idea. I do not think the market for their wares is ever going to decline, and the war on drugs is ever going to have any chance of being 'won'. I have lost half siblings and lots of cousins to addiction. The dealers never put the drug in their arm or nose, but are clearly part of the problem. It a very sad state of affairs for all parties.
That’s the trouble, I know drugs are an emotive subject for many, but it’s totally obvious that the ‘war on drugs’ has utterly failed and been a huge waste of time and money. Personally would much rather they were legalised in a regulated manner; at least it would take them out of criminals hands and people wouldn’t risk ingesting god knows what. I still wouldn’t take them anyway (ok well, maybe a pill on my birthday as a treat :lol:).
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9213
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by Controversial »

Playing devils advocate I know sentencing if often a topic of debate and often for good reason but on the flip side it still affects these people’s lives after they leave prison. Bull will likely lose his home and assets, he will have a criminal record that will affect his ability to get a “normal”’ job, his boxing career is likely over too. Maybe even lose friends and family too. I know some will play the worlds smallest violin but I guess my point is jail time will probably be the easiest bit, it’s rebuilding his life afterwards that will be hard. That’s why so many people end up on the constant cycle of jail, freedom, more crime and back to jail. Ultimately I have no sympathy.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9903
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by SeanBrennan »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 13:51
SeanBrennan wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 13:35 I think we can all agree that sex offenders receive extremely lenient sentences disproportionate to the harm they cause.

As for the length of sentences drug dealers should receive, I have no idea. I do not think the market for their wares is ever going to decline, and the war on drugs is ever going to have any chance of being 'won'. I have lost half siblings and lots of cousins to addiction. The dealers never put the drug in their arm or nose, but are clearly part of the problem. It a very sad state of affairs for all parties.
That’s the trouble, I know drugs are an emotive subject for many, but it’s totally obvious that the ‘war on drugs’ has utterly failed and been a huge waste of time and money. Personally would much rather they were legalised in a regulated manner; at least it would take them out of criminals hands and people wouldn’t risk ingesting god knows what. I still wouldn’t take them anyway (ok well, maybe a pill on my birthday as a treat :lol:).
this is pretty much my view entirely mate. I'm 41 now, the prospect of taking anything other than wine is zero for me these days, but lots of people take them. I fully appreciate the level of harm they cause but they are never ever going to be not taken so I'd much rather regulate and reduce harm. And I'm not naive I don't think Pfizer are nicer than a dealer but there would at least be regulation.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9903
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by SeanBrennan »

Controversial wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:13 Playing devils advocate I know sentencing if often a topic of debate and often for good reason but on the flip side it still affects these people’s lives after they leave prison. Bull will likely lose his home and assets, he will have a criminal record that will affect his ability to get a “normal”’ job, his boxing career is likely over too. Maybe even lose friends and family too. I know some will play the worlds smallest violin but I guess my point is jail time will probably be the easiest bit, it’s rebuilding his life afterwards that will be hard. That’s why so many people end up on the constant cycle of jail, freedom, more crime and back to jail. Ultimately I have no sympathy.
I don't think you are playing devis advocate I think you are making a very fair point mate. I found a cousin who had gone over when I was 14 and had been dead 2 weeks. So can understand why people are of the 'kill the dealers' view. But his dealer was an addict shotting on a low level to pay for his own habit, hardly Pablo. And even the people higher up are not monsters like paedophiles etc. It is all just a very shit situation. I don't know what the solution is either. But I think demonising (and I do this, and change my mind a lot so don't listen to me) the purveyors at this level is not going to solve anything.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9213
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by Controversial »

SeanBrennan wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:18
Controversial wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:13 Playing devils advocate I know sentencing if often a topic of debate and often for good reason but on the flip side it still affects these people’s lives after they leave prison. Bull will likely lose his home and assets, he will have a criminal record that will affect his ability to get a “normal”’ job, his boxing career is likely over too. Maybe even lose friends and family too. I know some will play the worlds smallest violin but I guess my point is jail time will probably be the easiest bit, it’s rebuilding his life afterwards that will be hard. That’s why so many people end up on the constant cycle of jail, freedom, more crime and back to jail. Ultimately I have no sympathy.
I don't think you are playing devis advocate I think you are making a very fair point mate. I found a cousin who had gone over when I was 14 and had been dead 2 weeks. So can understand why people are of the 'kill the dealers' view. But his dealer was an addict shotting on a low level to pay for his own habit, hardly Pablo. And even the people higher up are not monsters like paedophiles etc. It is all just a very shit situation. I don't know what the solution is either. But I think demonising (and I do this, and change my mind a lot so don't listen to me) the purveyors at this level is not going to solve anything.
Yeah I don’t know what the answer is, maybe legalise drugs and have some control over it. Alcohol causes more issues than drugs with addiction, crime and the impact on the NHS etc yet that is perfectly legal. But of course the government make millions in tax along with cigarettes so they pick and choose what “drug” is ok.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9903
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by SeanBrennan »

Controversial wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:27
SeanBrennan wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:18
Controversial wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:13 Playing devils advocate I know sentencing if often a topic of debate and often for good reason but on the flip side it still affects these people’s lives after they leave prison. Bull will likely lose his home and assets, he will have a criminal record that will affect his ability to get a “normal”’ job, his boxing career is likely over too. Maybe even lose friends and family too. I know some will play the worlds smallest violin but I guess my point is jail time will probably be the easiest bit, it’s rebuilding his life afterwards that will be hard. That’s why so many people end up on the constant cycle of jail, freedom, more crime and back to jail. Ultimately I have no sympathy.
I don't think you are playing devis advocate I think you are making a very fair point mate. I found a cousin who had gone over when I was 14 and had been dead 2 weeks. So can understand why people are of the 'kill the dealers' view. But his dealer was an addict shotting on a low level to pay for his own habit, hardly Pablo. And even the people higher up are not monsters like paedophiles etc. It is all just a very shit situation. I don't know what the solution is either. But I think demonising (and I do this, and change my mind a lot so don't listen to me) the purveyors at this level is not going to solve anything.
Yeah I don’t know what the answer is, maybe legalise drugs and have some control over it. Alcohol causes more issues than drugs with addiction, crime and the impact on the NHS etc yet that is perfectly legal. But of course the government make millions in tax along with cigarettes so they pick and choose what “drug” is ok.
very true. Please don't advocate for criminalising red wine though, not until I've finished radiotherapy mate, I need it :bag:
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9213
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by Controversial »

SeanBrennan wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:30
Controversial wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:27
SeanBrennan wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:18

I don't think you are playing devis advocate I think you are making a very fair point mate. I found a cousin who had gone over when I was 14 and had been dead 2 weeks. So can understand why people are of the 'kill the dealers' view. But his dealer was an addict shotting on a low level to pay for his own habit, hardly Pablo. And even the people higher up are not monsters like paedophiles etc. It is all just a very shit situation. I don't know what the solution is either. But I think demonising (and I do this, and change my mind a lot so don't listen to me) the purveyors at this level is not going to solve anything.
Yeah I don’t know what the answer is, maybe legalise drugs and have some control over it. Alcohol causes more issues than drugs with addiction, crime and the impact on the NHS etc yet that is perfectly legal. But of course the government make millions in tax along with cigarettes so they pick and choose what “drug” is ok.
very true. Please don't advocate for criminalising red wine though, not until I've finished radiotherapy mate, I need it :bag:
Ha I won’t mate, hope all going well for you
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9903
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by SeanBrennan »

Controversial wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:51
SeanBrennan wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:30
Controversial wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:27

Yeah I don’t know what the answer is, maybe legalise drugs and have some control over it. Alcohol causes more issues than drugs with addiction, crime and the impact on the NHS etc yet that is perfectly legal. But of course the government make millions in tax along with cigarettes so they pick and choose what “drug” is ok.
very true. Please don't advocate for criminalising red wine though, not until I've finished radiotherapy mate, I need it :bag:
Ha I won’t mate, hope all going well for you
really good mate. Had a prostatectomy on 12 August, and mine is not curable but is treatable. It has spread, so I am focusing on getting as healthy as possible. I was 19 stone 2 the day of my operation. I am 16 stone 13 today. Eating very little and getting my weight down, I used to do weight cuts for strongman so doing that now, need to get to 14 stone to be as light as possible asap and I will do. I am going to make sure I last as long as possible mate.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9213
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by Controversial »

SeanBrennan wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:57
Controversial wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:51
SeanBrennan wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:30

very true. Please don't advocate for criminalising red wine though, not until I've finished radiotherapy mate, I need it :bag:
Ha I won’t mate, hope all going well for you
really good mate. Had a prostatectomy on 12 August, and mine is not curable but is treatable. It has spread, so I am focusing on getting as healthy as possible. I was 19 stone 2 the day of my operation. I am 16 stone 13 today. Eating very little and getting my weight down, I used to do weight cuts for strongman so doing that now, need to get to 14 stone to be as light as possible asap and I will do. I am going to make sure I last as long as possible mate.
Oh man, what does not curable mean exactly, they can keep it under wraps with meds etc?
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10161
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by samwbr »

SeanBrennan wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:57
Controversial wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:51
SeanBrennan wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:30

very true. Please don't advocate for criminalising red wine though, not until I've finished radiotherapy mate, I need it :bag:
Ha I won’t mate, hope all going well for you
really good mate. Had a prostatectomy on 12 August, and mine is not curable but is treatable. It has spread, so I am focusing on getting as healthy as possible. I was 19 stone 2 the day of my operation. I am 16 stone 13 today. Eating very little and getting my weight down, I used to do weight cuts for strongman so doing that now, need to get to 14 stone to be as light as possible asap and I will do. I am going to make sure I last as long as possible mate.
All the best to you Sean, keep on going.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9903
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by SeanBrennan »

samwbr wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 17:15
SeanBrennan wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:57
Controversial wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 14:51

Ha I won’t mate, hope all going well for you
really good mate. Had a prostatectomy on 12 August, and mine is not curable but is treatable. It has spread, so I am focusing on getting as healthy as possible. I was 19 stone 2 the day of my operation. I am 16 stone 13 today. Eating very little and getting my weight down, I used to do weight cuts for strongman so doing that now, need to get to 14 stone to be as light as possible asap and I will do. I am going to make sure I last as long as possible mate.
All the best to you Sean, keep on going.
Thanks mate very much appreciated
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5446
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by forcefraser »

I've never understood what gives the government the right to determine what you put in your own body.

Surely alcohol is worse than a bit of smoke or sniff?
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9213
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by Controversial »

forcefraser wrote: 07 Sep 2025, 08:24 I've never understood what gives the government the right to determine what you put in your own body.

Surely alcohol is worse than a bit of smoke or sniff?
I guess it’s levels, obviously some drugs are highly addictive and cause a lot of major issues if you get hooked. But yeah long term alcohol use isn’t great either and hospitals more likely full of people with problems linked to drinking than people taking drugs.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23160
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by handsofstone »

He's a silly laddie is Steffy, career was at an all time high, he was one of the most popular trainers in the country but he's fcked it for what?

Coke is like weed as far as I'm concerned, sure some get too hung up on it like alcohol but most can use it recreationally, i seldom take it these days because it's overrated and I'm 40 but I've got good mates who sell it so I'm gonna be the last to just Steffy's morals

Heroin and crack on the other hand ruin lives so the book should be chucked at them, maybe if dealers werent making as much money off coke it'd be treated like weed
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3222
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: Steffy Bull

Post by smiling assassin »

Controversial wrote: 07 Sep 2025, 08:56
forcefraser wrote: 07 Sep 2025, 08:24 I've never understood what gives the government the right to determine what you put in your own body.

Surely alcohol is worse than a bit of smoke or sniff?
I guess it’s levels, obviously some drugs are highly addictive and cause a lot of major issues if you get hooked. But yeah long term alcohol use isn’t great either and hospitals more likely full of people with problems linked to drinking than people taking drugs.
Nothing to do with levels, Alcohol is taxed to high heaven so it’s legal. Take away drink and crime rate falls greatly all these people saying drug dealers are scum need to get a reality check
Post Reply