Howard Foster
Howard Foster
Well done on ruining another great fight with a shambolic stoppage. Absolute mug.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100664
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Howard Foster
Bullshit stoppage.
He saw an opportunity to give Fabio the win.
He saw an opportunity to give Fabio the win.
Re: Howard Foster
Would've certainly went to the cards, neither of them were hurt enough to go down imo, 2 great chins, 2 great engines. Any other ref it goes to the cards.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑25 Oct 2025, 18:49 Bullshit stoppage.
He saw an opportunity to give Fabio the win.
Re: Howard Foster
Need to get Howard Foster and Herb Dean to battle it out in an I quit match.
Re: Howard Foster
What's everyone's top 10 Howard Foster brain farts?
Re: Howard Foster
This one is on par with Froch-Groves. 2 brilliant fights that were denied a fitting ending. I'm seriously pissed off..Not watched boxing in ages, tune in to a proper great fight that could've went either way, now we'll never know.
-
foggyneedham
- Super Flyweight
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 12 Nov 2022, 20:05
Re: Howard Foster
Parker slumped on the ropes, don't see a problem with the stoppage...... Guessing people lost some betting money
Re: Howard Foster
Incompetence or dishonesty?
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100664
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Howard Foster
Is there a petition we can sign to ban Foster from refereeing big fights.
Re: Howard Foster
Yeah, I'm going with the latter too.
Dubois v Lerena was also Foster
Dubois v Lerena was also Foster
Re: Howard Foster
Boxing has too many Howard fosters. Need young, alert non bias refs….who am I kidding!
Re: Howard Foster
How I saw it too .foggyneedham wrote: ↑25 Oct 2025, 19:25 Parker slumped on the ropes, don't see a problem with the stoppage...... Guessing people lost some betting money
So many backing Parker to win
-
golden_labrador
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 1751
- Joined: 25 Dec 2020, 18:18
Re: Howard Foster
i was backing Joe to win but don't have a huge problem with the stoppage, just like I didn't with the Huni decision. we were just saved seeing a stretcher.rd350lc wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025, 02:24How I saw it too .foggyneedham wrote: ↑25 Oct 2025, 19:25 Parker slumped on the ropes, don't see a problem with the stoppage...... Guessing people lost some betting money
So many backing Parker to win
I'm curious to know if Foster would have stopped it if roles had been reversed though. Parker doesn't whack like Wardley but still could have hurt a defenceless Fab. this is the heavyweight division after all.
Re: Howard Foster
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3152
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: Howard Foster
We all wanted them to fight on to answer the question of whether Parker could sustain the beating long enough to capitalise on Wardley's post-salvo exhaustion, but Foster's predilections aside, stopping it early saved at least one man from potentially serious injury.
Neither would've dropped their shield and it wasn't the worst stoppage in recent times. The uppercut at 2:19 seemed to hurt Parker, who was caught again after responding, and then slowly raised his dropped guard, immobile on the ropes with exhaustion. Watching the replay he had his wits to get his gloves back up and could've taken some more, but his body language in the moment made me think the end was probably nigh.
Neither would've dropped their shield and it wasn't the worst stoppage in recent times. The uppercut at 2:19 seemed to hurt Parker, who was caught again after responding, and then slowly raised his dropped guard, immobile on the ropes with exhaustion. Watching the replay he had his wits to get his gloves back up and could've taken some more, but his body language in the moment made me think the end was probably nigh.
Last edited by Grilling Machine on 26 Oct 2025, 04:21, edited 1 time in total.
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1791
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Howard Foster
It was corruption. I am not even going to call it incompetence or a bad call.
If this was Wardley on the recieving end like that, there is absolutely ZERO chance it would have been stopped. He saw a chance to give the fight to Wardley and took it.
This one should be investigated and the decision reversed. Worst robbery I have seen for years.
If this was Wardley on the recieving end like that, there is absolutely ZERO chance it would have been stopped. He saw a chance to give the fight to Wardley and took it.
This one should be investigated and the decision reversed. Worst robbery I have seen for years.
Re: Howard Foster
Imagine foster doing tyson wilder 1. Rumble in the jungle or Gatti ward 1
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3152
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: Howard Foster
I think it's possible for both things to be true! Foster Fostered it, but at the same time I can see how a good ref might've stopped it out of concern for Parker's resignation to soak up more. He volunteered himself to the ropes on apparent fumes.tigermoth87 wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025, 04:18This one should be investigated and the decision reversed. Worst robbery I have seen for years.
30 seconds later the tables might've turned, and Parker has every right to feel aggrieved about that, but he gave the appearance of having so little left. If he'd moved to either side etc. I know leaning on the ropes is a valid tactic in that kind of late-fight situation, routine even, but you can't risk it looking like it isn't deliberate.
Re: Howard Foster
Fury was flat on his back with his eyes closed in the first Wilder fight and the ref gave him the count. Parker didn't even eat any of those shots in that final sequence and Foster is jumping in ffs, pathetic.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16376
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Howard Foster
I've seen worse stoppages but would he have stopped it if Wardley was in that position?
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100664
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Howard Foster
NoNightmare Roy wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025, 05:10 I've seen worse stoppages but would he have stopped it if Wardley was in that position?
Re: Howard Foster
It was actually a shot that missed that led the ref to jump in, Parkers instinct wasn't relief, it was to angrily shove Foster.
The New Zealander fought his heart out, was ahead on the cards, and the fight was coming to a gripping climax.
Both fighters deserve a bit of fair play
The New Zealander fought his heart out, was ahead on the cards, and the fight was coming to a gripping climax.
Both fighters deserve a bit of fair play
Re: Howard Foster
This is why I was so pissed, I actually had £20 on Wardley stoppage which was the Skybet in play price boost, but k wanted to see how it would've ended, I suspect ot goes to the cards but it was thrilling stuff in the championship rounds. What a wally Foster is, does it all the time.