Conor Benns Future Path

Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11626
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Conor Benns Future Path

Post by Taansend »

Personally I don't think he can safely make Welter anytime soon. But he seems adamant that he can & he knows his body better than I do.

Other than the Norman Haney winner I'd have him on a par with the likes of Crocker, Barrios & Romero.

The latter is the fight I'd like to see most but Rolly seems to be on a spiritual path or something right now.

Benn & Crocker share a promoter, don't they? No idea what Barrios next move is.

As for Light-middle, he'd be better off staying at Middle rather than going up against the killers in that division.

And while I think of it (on an unrelated note) if you had a head to head between the Champions at 147 & 140 you'd have a 3-1 or 4-0 win for the lighter boys.

WBC - Barrios v Matias
WBA - Romero v Russell
IBF - Crocker v Hitchens
WBO - Norman v Lopez
MPW
Super Middleweight
Posts: 367
Joined: 22 Jul 2012, 11:38

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by MPW »

Not sure about Benn going back down to 147 safely and healthily, but I agree he should stay away from 154.

Maybe staying at 160 is the best option for him. He did look good against Eubank Jr in both fights but maybe that was a case of shining against a weight-drained, faded boxer. If he was to stay at MW, Benn could test the waters against the likes of Oliha, McKenna, or Gualtieri.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by Coco »

It does depend how well he can do welter.

Crocker would be the easiest fight for him. Also it would be the easier and best paying fight for Crocker.

Obviously now Benn is box office and will earn well wherever.

If he can't do welter, Ennis would be a big money fight, but less than Eubank and with no chance of winning.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100697
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

I mean.. 147 wasn’t what it once was. Can he beat some of them guys? Definitely. Will he attempt to unify? Who knows.

154 will be dangerous for him, but making 147 might be even more dangerous.

He hasn’t weight anywhere near 150 for 3-4 years.
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3302
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

He’s still not worthy of being anywhere near world level fighters. At domestic level he’s in the mix.

If he stays at 160 does he beat Nathan Heaney ? Yeah probably but he loses the ringwalk again. Denzel ? Not imo no. I haven’t seen much of Liddard but I think he’d give him a good fight.

At 154 I think it’s possible that Ishmail walks right through his feather fisted shots and gets to him. Josh Kelly I’m not so sure if he has the cojones to beat Benn on a big occasion.

At 147 Catterall would pick him apart. Crocker might stop him and Donovan would probably out box him.
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6040
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by goose 5 »

Barrios is limited; Benn has a very good chance against him. Same with Romero and Ryan Garcia. Benn and Manny Pac would be huge in England.
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5346
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by dr_devious »

He'd have a great chance against Crocker if he can get down to 147 in reasonable shape
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13360
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by jameswilson »

I think trying to make 147 again is going to be a shock.
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3196
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by smiling assassin »

dr_devious wrote: 16 Nov 2025, 12:38 He'd have a great chance against Crocker if he can get down to 147 in reasonable shape
Would he have a great chance of besting Crocker? Benns done nothing since egg gate Crocker has just beat a very good fighter in Paddy Donovan. Granted he got lucky to get the rematch but it’s still a better win than what Benn has
golden_labrador
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1752
Joined: 25 Dec 2020, 18:18

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by golden_labrador »

reckon he should continue the Jake Paul path of fighting older, shot, weight-drained opponents (and pissing hot)
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26483
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by KiwiRider »

He will probably return to his hand picked list of paper opponents, and eventually retire with nothing on his resume and plenty in his bank account.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46243
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by gilgamesh »

Going back to 154 or staying at 160 would be smarter than going back to 147.
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3196
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by smiling assassin »

gilgamesh wrote: 16 Nov 2025, 13:53 Going back to 154 or staying at 160 would be smarter than going back to 147.
There’s good fighters at 154 he will get battered, 160 is no different. If he can’t do 147 he might as we well do misfits
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46243
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by gilgamesh »

smiling assassin wrote: 16 Nov 2025, 13:58
gilgamesh wrote: 16 Nov 2025, 13:53 Going back to 154 or staying at 160 would be smarter than going back to 147.
There’s good fighters at 154 he will get battered, 160 is no different. If he can’t do 147 he might as we well do misfits
160 definitely ain't got the guys that 154 has. Erislandy Lara is quite beatable, but I'd imagine his reign is only a few short weeks from being over.

Barrios and Romero are very, very weak titleholders.

I still don't know how good that Janibek dude is at Middleweight. 154 with Boots and Ortiz are the biggest fights in the weight range.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26483
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by KiwiRider »

gilgamesh wrote: 16 Nov 2025, 14:01
smiling assassin wrote: 16 Nov 2025, 13:58
gilgamesh wrote: 16 Nov 2025, 13:53 Going back to 154 or staying at 160 would be smarter than going back to 147.
There’s good fighters at 154 he will get battered, 160 is no different. If he can’t do 147 he might as we well do misfits
160 definitely ain't got the guys that 154 has. Erislandy Lara is quite beatable, but I'd imagine his reign is only a few short weeks from being over.

Barrios and Romero are very, very weak titleholders.

I still don't know how good that Janibek dude is at Middleweight. 154 with Boots and Ortiz are the biggest fights in the weight range.
I get what you're saying Gil, but this is a guy who has ducked domestic titles. He may, or may not even be the best at 147-160 in his own country.
If he does get to line up a big opportunity at any weight, he just doesn't have enough egg free power to trouble most of those guys.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46243
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by gilgamesh »

I've honestly only ever seen Benn in these 2 Eubank fights. Kid didn't look bad in either of those.

Whether he can win any big fights or not, I certainly think I'd give it a whirl if he's able to get a few more wins. You're generally gonna make more money to lose to a big name than you would to beat up 4 or 5 guys that aren't particularly known.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11626
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by Taansend »

Who did he duck, Kiwi?

Genuine question. I have no idea.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100697
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Taansend wrote: 16 Nov 2025, 14:37 Who did he duck, Kiwi?

Genuine question. I have no idea.
He means, he was a complete novice and he skipped Area, English, British, Commonwealth and Euro level. And thinks he world level because he won a WBA regional belt and defended it against the likes of Van Heerden and Algieri.

Got him a nice ranking, but we don’t know what level he’s at really.

He hasn’t fought any hungry fighters.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46243
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by gilgamesh »

I do think these 2 fights with Eubank have certainly made him better though. I'd imagine these were the 2 most strenuous training camps he's gone through, and the 1st bout with Eubank was definitely his toughest fight to date. Coming through a tough fight, and doing well even in defeat will generally boost a guy's confidence, and see him raise his game a little. That's one thing people ain't giving Benn any credit for. He fought a smarter fight than he did the first time, and did look sharper and more in control of himself and his strategy.

Whether he'll be able to get it done later against other Top competition only time will tell, but I do think Benn has legitimately raised his game in these 2 bouts and will be better going forward than he'd been.
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3196
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by smiling assassin »

gilgamesh wrote: 16 Nov 2025, 14:50 I do think these 2 fights with Eubank have certainly made him better though. I'd imagine these were the 2 most strenuous training camps he's gone through, and the 1st bout with Eubank was definitely his toughest fight to date. Coming through a tough fight, and doing well even in defeat will generally boost a guy's confidence, and see him raise his game a little. That's one thing people ain't giving Benn any credit for. He fought a smarter fight than he did the first time, and did look sharper and more in control of himself and his strategy.

Whether he'll be able to get it done later against other Top competition only time will tell, but I do think Benn has legitimately raised his game in these 2 bouts and will be better going forward than he'd been.
He gets no credit from me last night. Eubank looked so so poor and he didn’t get him out of there
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46243
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by gilgamesh »

Well we'll see where he's at next time. What kinda competition they target for his next bout will be quite telling as well. If they go right back to relatively soft opposition it must mean someone in his managerial team agrees with you that it was all a bit of smoke and mirrors.
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9142
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by gregregegg »

@147 barrios is a pretty weak champ, that’s the fight.

Then if you win try to defend vs pac or ryan Garcia

@154 it’s Josh Kelly, Thurman and the tszyu brothers.

Honestly… he would make a deacent Jake Paul opponent too.

I still want him to fight eubank 168 no hydration clause, end the trilogy.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11626
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by Taansend »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 16 Nov 2025, 14:45
Taansend wrote: 16 Nov 2025, 14:37 Who did he duck, Kiwi?

Genuine question. I have no idea.
He means, he was a complete novice and he skipped Area, English, British, Commonwealth and Euro level. And thinks he world level because he won a WBA regional belt and defended it against the likes of Van Heerden and Algieri.

Got him a nice ranking, but we don’t know what level he’s at really.

He hasn’t fought any hungry fighters.
Aaahhh, got it.

I was actually just thinking about this today after hearing of Kaylors passing. Back then going for the British, Commonwealth & European titles were just the route you took if you were serious about a World title shot. That was how you did it.

Nowadays with four main belts, and each one of them having secondary (or more belts) in addition to inter-continental etc etc the three aforementioned belts almost seem an afterthought.

I wouldn't really label it 'ducking'. That implies that's the only route. Now the fighters have more options.

I genuinely have no idea if Benn is any good on a World level. I know he's better than I thought he was, or at least tougher. I was impressed with his speed & footwork last night but we'll see how that works against a young hungry fighter.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26483
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by KiwiRider »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 16 Nov 2025, 14:45
Taansend wrote: 16 Nov 2025, 14:37 Who did he duck, Kiwi?

Genuine question. I have no idea.
He means, he was a complete novice and he skipped Area, English, British, Commonwealth and Euro level. And thinks he world level because he won a WBA regional belt and defended it against the likes of Van Heerden and Algieri.

Got him a nice ranking, but we don’t know what level he’s at really.

He hasn’t fought any hungry fighters.
Thanks Ruthie :TU:
Yeah that's pretty much it. Ducking easily available local opponents, instead forking out money to face the ghost of Chris Algeri for example.
A very carefully curated career with no real accolades. When it's all said and done, what's in his byline?
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100697
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Conor Benns Future Path

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Post Reply