this one is 'game-changing'2019588 wrote: ↑04 Oct 2025, 05:22They had the same Riyadh "sponsorship" while on Sky. Didn't seem to make much differenceRuthless-RKO wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 03:58 Riyadh Season Agrees to Major Sponsorship With Boxxer in Support of BBC Deal
Riyadh Season has agreed to a "game-changing" sponsorship with promotional outfit Boxxer.
The deal promises to "support the new era of UK fight nights" and "deliver big events to millions" of British fight fans.
News of the deal was shared on The Ring's social accounts alongside a photo of promoter Ben Shalom and Turki Alalshikh, chairman of Saudi Arabia’s General Entertainment Authority.
Shalom heads up Boxxer and recently secured a broadcast deal with the BBC, months after his company's partnership with Sky Sports came to an end.
The Boxxer-BBC venture will kick off October 25 with Frazer Clarke vs. Jeamie TKV for the British heavyweight title. The event will be shown live on BBC Two in a primetime slot of 8-10 pm. Undercard action will stream on the BBC iPlayer.
Shalom was noticeably absent from the kick-off press conference for the fight in London on Wednesday, and it's now become clear the 30-year-old, who's been on the ground in Riyadh for days, has hashed out a groundbreaking deal for boxing in the UK.
Clarke-TKV marks the first time professional boxing will be shown on traditional BBC programming since 2005.
The fight will take place at Derby's Vaillant Live Arena.
Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100802
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
-
johnmanchester
- Light Flyweight
- Posts: 247
- Joined: 12 May 2025, 04:36
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
Lol I've applied to change username. I don't know how that got stuck on me.
Wischousen deleting emails looks dodgy. But it's also mental for Boxxer to try and claim he verbally agreed to a 24 month non compete.
I think this case was a move designed to keep sky out of boxing in the short term while boxxer tries to retain key members of stable.
But if it goes to trial, all sorts of details and dirty laundry will end up being aired and be widely reported on. So I am not sure this will ever actually make it to trial.
I'm also not sure it was wise to drag specific sky exec into it by name. Sky coming down off the fence and getting involved or launching their own suit is not something boxxer wants or needs.
It also makes you radioactive. There is no way sky will work with you in any way shape or form after doing something like that. You'll be dead to them.
And if this does go to trial, it's surely a simple matter of asking sky to disclose why boxxer was not renewed. Usually renewals are done well in advance (sky renewed matchroom halfway into their deal, for example) so the decision to not renew boxxer was probably made in 2024.
If that can be established, or if sky can be brought to provide reason(s) why they did not renew boxxer, that's the end of boxxer case right there. Boxxer is alleging it's all down to John W sending a few emails in March 2025. Sky can clear that up in an instant for the court, if other reasons exist and predate.
So yeah fascinating case, but I am not sure it's been thought through much beyond securing a short-term injunction to stop Wischousen working with Sky in the coming months.
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
The likes of Whittaker would be better off now with Boxxer on the BBC , would get his fights with a few hundred thousand or more viewers instead of being buried away on DAZN.
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
I think for most guys who don't have a following already through the Olympics, social media or perhaps aren't as exciting boxers with highlight reel KO's, the BBC route until a British title would almost certainly be the best route to building their profile in the country before moving over to bigger paychecks.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100802
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
Implications
The advantage is the financial muscle provided by the Riyadh Season sponsorship. This major backing injects necessary capital into Boxxer, helping to offset the loss of revenue from the lucrative Sky Sports contract. This funding ensures that Boxxer can maintain high production standards and offer competitive purses, allowing them to keep their best fighters.
While the BBC platform is excellent for exposure, the transition carries the disadvantage of potentially limiting the quality of elite match-ups. The highest-level, most expensive fights in boxing typically require a pay-per-view (PPV) model to generate the necessary revenue for large fighter purses. While the Riyadh Season sponsorship helps, the free-to-air BBC deal may restrict Boxxer’s ability to consistently secure international, world-championship-level main events.
The advantage is the financial muscle provided by the Riyadh Season sponsorship. This major backing injects necessary capital into Boxxer, helping to offset the loss of revenue from the lucrative Sky Sports contract. This funding ensures that Boxxer can maintain high production standards and offer competitive purses, allowing them to keep their best fighters.
While the BBC platform is excellent for exposure, the transition carries the disadvantage of potentially limiting the quality of elite match-ups. The highest-level, most expensive fights in boxing typically require a pay-per-view (PPV) model to generate the necessary revenue for large fighter purses. While the Riyadh Season sponsorship helps, the free-to-air BBC deal may restrict Boxxer’s ability to consistently secure international, world-championship-level main events.
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
2019588 wrote: ↑04 Oct 2025, 05:43Lol I've applied to change username. I don't know how that got stuck on me.
Wischousen deleting emails looks dodgy. But it's also mental for Boxxer to try and claim he verbally agreed to a 24 month non compete.
I think this case was a move designed to keep sky out of boxing in the short term while boxxer tries to retain key members of stable.
But if it goes to trial, all sorts of details and dirty laundry will end up being aired and be widely reported on. So I am not sure this will ever actually make it to trial.
I'm also not sure it was wise to drag specific sky exec into it by name. Sky coming down off the fence and getting involved or launching their own suit is not something boxxer wants or needs.
It also makes you radioactive. There is no way sky will work with you in any way shape or form after doing something like that. You'll be dead to them.
And if this does go to trial, it's surely a simple matter of asking sky to disclose why boxxer was not renewed. Usually renewals are done well in advance (sky renewed matchroom halfway into their deal, for example) so the decision to not renew boxxer was probably made in 2024.
If that can be established, or if sky can be brought to provide reason(s) why they did not renew boxxer, that's the end of boxxer case right there. Boxxer is alleging it's all down to John W sending a few emails in March 2025. Sky can clear that up in an instant for the court, if other reasons exist and predate.
So yeah fascinating case, but I am not sure it's been thought through much beyond securing a short-term injunction to stop Wischousen working with Sky in the coming months.
Fairy nuff.
I mean, I agree with you and everyone that Boxxer probably deserved the boot, but that Torygraph piece and the deleted emails do smell a bit.
Good courtoom fight to watch along with the boxing !
-
Rockytony67
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 173
- Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 13:27
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
I asked Grok if there were any updates on this, and it came up with this
"Boxxer, a UK-based boxing promotion company, has filed a breach of contract lawsuit against its former head of boxing, John Wischhusen, in the High Court of England and Wales. The dispute centres on Wischhusen's alleged role in undermining Boxxer's negotiations for a renewed broadcast deal with Sky Sports, which expired in June 2025 after a four-year, £36 million agreement. Boxxer claims Wischhusen secretly corresponded with Sky about a rival boxing venture starting in March 2025, deleted relevant emails from his company account in August 2025, and violated an implied non-compete clause despite leaving the company around that time.
In September 2025, Boxxer sought and obtained an interim injunction from Mrs Justice Hill, restraining Wischhusen from working with competitors or engaging in boxing-related activities (including discussions with Sky) that could harm Boxxer's interests, pending a full trial later in the year. Wischhusen denies the allegations, claiming he never agreed to a formal contract with non-compete terms, the deleted emails were a panicked response to Boxxer's litigious reputation, and any spreadsheets he created were hypothetical. He argues the injunction would effectively bar him from the industry.
The case could impact Boxxer's future partnerships, as the company shifted to a less lucrative BBC deal after Sky refused to renew its contract. A win might bolster its reputation for protecting contracts. No further rulings or trial outcomes have been reported as of October 4, 2025."
I think the middle paragraph is an update to what we last heard.
"Boxxer, a UK-based boxing promotion company, has filed a breach of contract lawsuit against its former head of boxing, John Wischhusen, in the High Court of England and Wales. The dispute centres on Wischhusen's alleged role in undermining Boxxer's negotiations for a renewed broadcast deal with Sky Sports, which expired in June 2025 after a four-year, £36 million agreement. Boxxer claims Wischhusen secretly corresponded with Sky about a rival boxing venture starting in March 2025, deleted relevant emails from his company account in August 2025, and violated an implied non-compete clause despite leaving the company around that time.
In September 2025, Boxxer sought and obtained an interim injunction from Mrs Justice Hill, restraining Wischhusen from working with competitors or engaging in boxing-related activities (including discussions with Sky) that could harm Boxxer's interests, pending a full trial later in the year. Wischhusen denies the allegations, claiming he never agreed to a formal contract with non-compete terms, the deleted emails were a panicked response to Boxxer's litigious reputation, and any spreadsheets he created were hypothetical. He argues the injunction would effectively bar him from the industry.
The case could impact Boxxer's future partnerships, as the company shifted to a less lucrative BBC deal after Sky refused to renew its contract. A win might bolster its reputation for protecting contracts. No further rulings or trial outcomes have been reported as of October 4, 2025."
I think the middle paragraph is an update to what we last heard.
-
johnmanchester
- Light Flyweight
- Posts: 247
- Joined: 12 May 2025, 04:36
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
Yeah it's all very interesting.
That whole era from Hearn leaving Sky, Boxxer coming in, Sky funding Boxxer to try and compete with Hearn only for Middle Eastern oil money to turn up and change everything, then in the end Sky ditch Boxxer and now into a courtroom drama... It would be a great TV series.
Actually I think the injunction against Wischousen /Sky isn't even about Sky doing boxing per se. I think it's to try and take them out as a rival bidder for Whittaker, if rumours of Whittaker being a free agent are accurate.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100802
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
Boxxer’s Ben Shalom aiming for ‘a show a month’ with the BBC
Ben Shalom said his Boxxer stable will be looking to produce a card a month ahead of his promotional stable’s debut on the BBC.
Shalom was previously with Sky Sports, but he starts his new journey with a British heavyweight title fight between former Olympian Frazer Clarke and Jeamie “TKV” Tshikeva.
Speaking at the press conference ahead of the new network deal with the British broadcasting giant, Shalom said: “It’s been a long time; delighted to be here. Delighted to see everyone here. It’s a massive moment for us, it’s a massive moment for British boxing. “Boxing is flying right now but what we need is national audiences; we need household names; we need the future stars of the sport and BBC have given us that opportunity. It really is an opportunity for us and an opportunity for boxing to get back on the front pages, and on the back pages, and put on some major, major nights.”
Clarke-TKV is their first show, and a super-middleweight bout between Callum Simpson and Troy Williamson follows on December 20. Adam Azim is thought to be headlining a Boxxer card in January.
“It all starts on Saturday with the British heavyweight title and we’ll be looking for a show a month thereafter, so it’s a massive moment for us but really excited to get going and Saturday night is a huge event,” Shalom added.
“We had to find a way to make boxing work for [the BBC]. For 20 years they’ve decided to take a break from the sport. There were reasons for that, and they’re in a position where now they want to connect with their younger audiences; they want to connect with combat sports audiences, and for us it was how can we disrupt the industry; how can we bring boxing to mainstream audiences; how can we break down barriers, and BBC are the perfect partner to do that.
“Timing is everything. Timing for us was good; timing for them was good and it all begins on Saturday night.”
Ben Shalom said his Boxxer stable will be looking to produce a card a month ahead of his promotional stable’s debut on the BBC.
Shalom was previously with Sky Sports, but he starts his new journey with a British heavyweight title fight between former Olympian Frazer Clarke and Jeamie “TKV” Tshikeva.
Speaking at the press conference ahead of the new network deal with the British broadcasting giant, Shalom said: “It’s been a long time; delighted to be here. Delighted to see everyone here. It’s a massive moment for us, it’s a massive moment for British boxing. “Boxing is flying right now but what we need is national audiences; we need household names; we need the future stars of the sport and BBC have given us that opportunity. It really is an opportunity for us and an opportunity for boxing to get back on the front pages, and on the back pages, and put on some major, major nights.”
Clarke-TKV is their first show, and a super-middleweight bout between Callum Simpson and Troy Williamson follows on December 20. Adam Azim is thought to be headlining a Boxxer card in January.
“It all starts on Saturday with the British heavyweight title and we’ll be looking for a show a month thereafter, so it’s a massive moment for us but really excited to get going and Saturday night is a huge event,” Shalom added.
“We had to find a way to make boxing work for [the BBC]. For 20 years they’ve decided to take a break from the sport. There were reasons for that, and they’re in a position where now they want to connect with their younger audiences; they want to connect with combat sports audiences, and for us it was how can we disrupt the industry; how can we bring boxing to mainstream audiences; how can we break down barriers, and BBC are the perfect partner to do that.
“Timing is everything. Timing for us was good; timing for them was good and it all begins on Saturday night.”
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
People can criticise all they want.
i am willing to bet Shalom already got something in place after the 4 show deal
Those who showed some balls in staying with Shalom have the possibility of making themselves
into household names by boxing on the bbc.
i am willing to bet Shalom already got something in place after the 4 show deal
Those who showed some balls in staying with Shalom have the possibility of making themselves
into household names by boxing on the bbc.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22943
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
Not quite. More well known amongst a certain demographic, definitely. Household names? Millions don't even watch the BBC nowadays, you'd be better off going viral on TikTok.
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
Can't beat cross promotion which the BBC can do to build up profilesmickey1975 wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025, 13:23Not quite. More well known amongst a certain demographic, definitely. Household names? Millions don't even watch the BBC nowadays, you'd be better off going viral on TikTok.
-
johnmanchester
- Light Flyweight
- Posts: 247
- Joined: 12 May 2025, 04:36
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
They're probably more interested in earning with Hearn, or making bank with Frank.
Boxers won't be making too much money from whatever the bbc is paying per event. Numbers I've seen posted around are 200k, 250k per show. Even if you doubled that to 500k a show, that's nothing in pro boxing terms.
It's a great spot for up and coming talent to showcase themselves though. Score a good win or two on national TV then sign with one of the big promotions like Whittaker did.
Prizefighting - there's a clue in the name
-
Frostieballs
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 1996
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
Is £500k not a lot in boxing terms for a non PPV event?johnmanchester wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025, 14:42They're probably more interested in earning with Hearn, or making bank with Frank.
Boxers won't be making too much money from whatever the bbc is paying per event. Numbers I've seen posted around are 200k, 250k per show. Even if you doubled that to 500k a show, that's nothing in pro boxing terms.
It's a great spot for up and coming talent to showcase themselves though. Score a good win or two on national TV then sign with one of the big promotions like Whittaker did.
Prizefighting - there's a clue in the name![]()
Sky used to pay under £100k for British title fights back in the day, but I’m long out the sport now and things could have changed drastically.
-
johnmanchester
- Light Flyweight
- Posts: 247
- Joined: 12 May 2025, 04:36
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
No I'm saying even if you doubled the rumoured 200-250k per bbc event, you still only arrive at 500k, which is not a lot when you've got production costs to cover, staffing costs, purses for whole card, hotels, travel etc
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
what a l load of
u know f+clk all
u know f+clk all
-
Frostieballs
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 1996
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
I’d say that’s a very decent amount for a domestic card!johnmanchester wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025, 20:23 No I'm saying even if you doubled the rumoured 200-250k per bbc event, you still only arrive at 500k, which is not a lot when you've got production costs to cover, staffing costs, purses for whole card, hotels, travel etc
How much do you think the fighters are getting?
-
johnmanchester
- Light Flyweight
- Posts: 247
- Joined: 12 May 2025, 04:36
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
Do you work for Boxxer mate? You sound deeply involved and emotionally invested.
Can you quickly run us through some numbers, seeing as you've got this level of connection and insight the rest of us don't?
Last edited by johnmanchester on 28 Nov 2025, 04:06, edited 1 time in total.
-
johnmanchester
- Light Flyweight
- Posts: 247
- Joined: 12 May 2025, 04:36
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
Sure, if you're a domestic promoter doing domestic level events then it's fine I guess.Frostieballs wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025, 04:00I’d say that’s a very decent amount for a domestic card!johnmanchester wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025, 20:23 No I'm saying even if you doubled the rumoured 200-250k per bbc event, you still only arrive at 500k, which is not a lot when you've got production costs to cover, staffing costs, purses for whole card, hotels, travel etc
How much do you think the fighters are getting?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22943
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
The Leeds card in December is selling very well, they'll do ok out of that one.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100802
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
What does Boxxer's new broadcast deal mean for boxing?
When Lauren Price out-boxed Natasha Jonas at the Royal Albert Hall in March, picking up the WBC and IBF welterweight titles, the Welshwoman declared she wanted two more fights in 2025.
The Jonas-Price bout headlined an all-female card at the iconic London venue and was a big statement from promoter Ben Shalom and Boxxer. His stable, which also includes Chris Eubank Jr., Chris Billam-Smith, Adam Azim, Caroline Dubois and Francesca Hennessy, was on the up.
However, 2025 has not been smooth sailing for Boxxer or its fighters. Price, for example, has not fought since March.
On Saturday, Boxxer's partnership with the BBC makes its hard-launch with a British heavyweight title clash between Frazer Clarke and Jeamie "TKV" Tshikeva.
So what does the broadcast deal look like and what does it mean for some of the country's biggest names and rising stars?
Why is Boxxer on the BBC now?
In June, Sky Sports announced they would not be renewing their broadcast deal with Boxxer.
It was an interesting move from the broadcaster and a blow for Boxxer. Broadcasters, especially those the size of Sky, are crucial for promoters. It's where the majority of the money that bankroll fights come from and provides a platform for fighters.
Speculation around what it meant for all parties swirled.
Boxxer didn't comment and fighters didn't know when they would be back in the ring. The void was filled by Shalom's competitors who were more than willing to stick the boot in. Fighters, including arguably their biggest star Ben Whittaker, chose not to renew their deals with the company, too.
The 30-year-old admits the period was challenging.
"One thing I've been able to do over time is completely separate the boxing world from the real world. [Boxing] is an echo chamber," Shalom told ESPN. "I don't really have a relationship [with rival promoters] and I don't really need to. I think they're competitors. They've never wanted competition. But that's business isn't it?"
What's involved in the new deal?
This new chapter for Boxxer has been a long time coming but as Shalom points out, moving from one broadcasting giant to another is no simple task.
Boxing has a storied history on free-to-air television in the UK, with shows such as The Big Fight Live on ITV, while the BBC has broadcast many famous fights, including Joe Frazier vs. Muhammad Ali in 1971, which was watched by 27.5 million people.
However, there has been a gap in recent years.
Boxxer want a show a month on the BBC, starting this weekend. Adam Azim is set to headline his first show on the platform in the new year, with Jan. 31 in London being targeted.
Unified welterweight champion Lauren Price is looking to fight in Cardiff in February before targeting an undisputed fight against Mikaela Mayer.
Those are the plans through the start of next year.
Shalom has said the BBC agreement is a "multi-year, multi-fight" deal. The promoter has also said they have the opportunity for a pay-TV agreement with another outlet, which will be announced in the coming weeks.
It means Boxxer fighters will have the ability to fight on non-BBC cards should the opportunity present itself, just as Adam Azim did on the Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn 2 undercard, which was broadcast on DAZN.
What does it mean for boxing?
Any time boxing is on free-to-air television, it's a big deal for the sport.
Boxxer have the opportunity capture casual fans and introduce them to their fighters, which is important for them and the growth of boxing.
It also means competition in the industry.
The UK's two other promotional companies, Matchroom and Queensberry, have exclusive deals with DAZN. If Boxxer can have shows on the BBC while occasionally having their fighters on other major cards, too, it's a win-win.
"We don't want to be part of the crowd. We like to stand out," Shalom said.
"We've been so focused on growing as a business, to be focused on grassroots and taking the sport to bigger audiences, that when the BBC opportunity finally came around, it was something that we had to take and timing is everything."
When Lauren Price out-boxed Natasha Jonas at the Royal Albert Hall in March, picking up the WBC and IBF welterweight titles, the Welshwoman declared she wanted two more fights in 2025.
The Jonas-Price bout headlined an all-female card at the iconic London venue and was a big statement from promoter Ben Shalom and Boxxer. His stable, which also includes Chris Eubank Jr., Chris Billam-Smith, Adam Azim, Caroline Dubois and Francesca Hennessy, was on the up.
However, 2025 has not been smooth sailing for Boxxer or its fighters. Price, for example, has not fought since March.
On Saturday, Boxxer's partnership with the BBC makes its hard-launch with a British heavyweight title clash between Frazer Clarke and Jeamie "TKV" Tshikeva.
So what does the broadcast deal look like and what does it mean for some of the country's biggest names and rising stars?
Why is Boxxer on the BBC now?
In June, Sky Sports announced they would not be renewing their broadcast deal with Boxxer.
It was an interesting move from the broadcaster and a blow for Boxxer. Broadcasters, especially those the size of Sky, are crucial for promoters. It's where the majority of the money that bankroll fights come from and provides a platform for fighters.
Speculation around what it meant for all parties swirled.
Boxxer didn't comment and fighters didn't know when they would be back in the ring. The void was filled by Shalom's competitors who were more than willing to stick the boot in. Fighters, including arguably their biggest star Ben Whittaker, chose not to renew their deals with the company, too.
The 30-year-old admits the period was challenging.
"One thing I've been able to do over time is completely separate the boxing world from the real world. [Boxing] is an echo chamber," Shalom told ESPN. "I don't really have a relationship [with rival promoters] and I don't really need to. I think they're competitors. They've never wanted competition. But that's business isn't it?"
What's involved in the new deal?
This new chapter for Boxxer has been a long time coming but as Shalom points out, moving from one broadcasting giant to another is no simple task.
Boxing has a storied history on free-to-air television in the UK, with shows such as The Big Fight Live on ITV, while the BBC has broadcast many famous fights, including Joe Frazier vs. Muhammad Ali in 1971, which was watched by 27.5 million people.
However, there has been a gap in recent years.
Boxxer want a show a month on the BBC, starting this weekend. Adam Azim is set to headline his first show on the platform in the new year, with Jan. 31 in London being targeted.
Unified welterweight champion Lauren Price is looking to fight in Cardiff in February before targeting an undisputed fight against Mikaela Mayer.
Those are the plans through the start of next year.
Shalom has said the BBC agreement is a "multi-year, multi-fight" deal. The promoter has also said they have the opportunity for a pay-TV agreement with another outlet, which will be announced in the coming weeks.
It means Boxxer fighters will have the ability to fight on non-BBC cards should the opportunity present itself, just as Adam Azim did on the Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn 2 undercard, which was broadcast on DAZN.
What does it mean for boxing?
Any time boxing is on free-to-air television, it's a big deal for the sport.
Boxxer have the opportunity capture casual fans and introduce them to their fighters, which is important for them and the growth of boxing.
It also means competition in the industry.
The UK's two other promotional companies, Matchroom and Queensberry, have exclusive deals with DAZN. If Boxxer can have shows on the BBC while occasionally having their fighters on other major cards, too, it's a win-win.
"We don't want to be part of the crowd. We like to stand out," Shalom said.
"We've been so focused on growing as a business, to be focused on grassroots and taking the sport to bigger audiences, that when the BBC opportunity finally came around, it was something that we had to take and timing is everything."
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
mickey1975 wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025, 13:23Not quite. More well known amongst a certain demographic, definitely. Household names? Millions don't even watch the BBC nowadays, you'd be better off going viral on TikTok.
i concede to you pal …
good post
-
johnmanchester
- Light Flyweight
- Posts: 247
- Joined: 12 May 2025, 04:36
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
See what you mean now. Big night for TKV.
*this was sarcasm BTW. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
Last edited by johnmanchester on 03 Dec 2025, 18:16, edited 1 time in total.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32661
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
My parents watched it on my recommendation, they probably haven’t watched any boxing at all for c.25 years when I moved out. Said they quite enjoyed it, although suffice to say they weren’t impressed with the skill levels or fitness on display in the main event, a far cry from the 1970s heavyweights they remember watching 
Re: Boxxer agrees on 'historic' broadcast deal with BBC
I know a few people who watched it because it was free on BBC....they weren't impressed with the whole experience! 