Yep, the past few years have turned boxing into a complete joke. Especially since saps, even saps on here, are actually buying into it and believing these fights are legit.
All started with Floyd Mayweather carrying Conor McGregor.
Yep, the past few years have turned boxing into a complete joke. Especially since saps, even saps on here, are actually buying into it and believing these fights are legit.
It’s rare for anyone to agree with anything I say on here :-)keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 09:55Pretty much agree with everything you just said Mr Frostieballs.Frostieballs wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 09:53 I think it was a legit fight, but Joshua played with his a food a bit and a bit hesitant to pull the trigger.
Took his time, took the opportunity to shake of some ring rust, got the job done.
What I will say, despite how much I dislike him, is that Paul is a game bastard.
Seems to be some kind of adrenaline junkie who enjoyed feeling the full force of a legit heavyweight.
It's been happening since the Jack Johnson days and before, but back then and all the way through to recently they were classed as exhibitions. I have no problem with Ali-Inoki, Jack Johnson-Frank Gotch, Dempsey-George Godfrey etc, because they were exhibitions. Mayweather-McGregor and Paul-Joshua being sanctioned is unforgivable.tigermoth87 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 09:56Yep, the past few years have turned boxing into a complete joke. Especially since saps, even saps on here, are actually buying into it and believing these fights are legit.
All started with Floyd Mayweather carrying Conor McGregor.
I guess it depends how you look at it. HWs pad their records out all the time fighting guys in worse shape and less skilled than JP, are these guys more worthy of being called a "pro boxer" than JP is? He's been training and boxing for 8+ years and has access to the best of everything, trainers, S&C coaches, dieticians, sparring partners, equipment etc.., things that probably 99% of fighters would dream of having and he gets himself into good shape. At some point the YouTuber tag became irrelevant, he appears to be more dedicated to boxing than Dave Allen was for many years.
Yeah, but Joshua is a proven heavyweight contender. It's a while since any of the top guys fought someone that poor while still near their prime. I suppose Fury-Sefer Seferi would be an example. Fury was coming off a layoff, but that was a absolutely terrible matchmaking. I can't think of another top guy coming off a layoff in the history of boxing who came back against such a complete dumpling.Controversial wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:08I guess it depends how you look at it. HWs pad their records out all the time fighting guys in worse shape and less skilled than JP, are these guys more worthy at being called a "pro boxer" than JP is? He's been training and boxing for 8+ years and has access to the best of everything, trainers, S&C coaches, dieticians, sparring partners, equipment etc.., things that probably 99% of fighters would dream of having and he gets himself into good shape. At some point the YouTube tag became irrelevant, he appears to be more dedicated to boxing than Dave Allen was for many years.
That's a false equivalence. If you want to treat JP as a boxer then in this fight you had a former world heavyweight champion who has won 90% of his fights via KO against a novice cruiserweight who had previously lost to Tommy Fury.Controversial wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:08I guess it depends how you look at it. HWs pad their records out all the time fighting guys in worse shape and less skilled than JP, are these guys more worthy of being called a "pro boxer" than JP is? He's been training and boxing for 8+ years and has access to the best of everything, trainers, S&C coaches, dieticians, sparring partners, equipment etc.., things that probably 99% of fighters would dream of having and he gets himself into good shape. At some point the YouTuber tag became irrelevant, he appears to be more dedicated to boxing than Dave Allen was for many years.
There were even a few times when he went to throw a right hand, and he slowed it down to make sure Jake Paul ducked, and it went over his head or something.Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 08:15Yep there were a few examples of that, plus the tactics were a bit suspect, only throwing jabs and telegraphed big rights rather than bodyshots / hooks which would have undoubtedly been better choices. I def wouldn’t say it was ‘fixed’ but enough evidence to show Joshua wasn’t giving 100%, similar to how Floyd took it easy on McGregor in the first half of their fight.tigermoth87 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 07:47 You only have to watch the fight from where Paul was gassed in like Round 4 with his arms by the side, , open for a hit and falling over every 30 seconds and AJ kept holding back. Any other fighter in the world, and AJ would have put them to sleep. not hold off.
He clearly had orders to drag the fight out as long as he feasibly could.
Surely they weren't alone in thinking that JP would be on his bike and a bit more, against a notoriously slow starter.gilgamesh wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:57 Yes
The first red flag to me that something was off was when I saw DraftKings offering bonuses for anyone that bet Joshua to win by KO in the first 2 rounds. There's no real reason why they would've offered that kinda bonus unless they KNEW it wasn't going to happen.
Didn't have to be the first jab, but the first "cutting the ring off, and throw a combination" surely would've ended it.Kilburn wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 11:02Surely they weren't alone in thinking that JP would be on his bike and a bit more, against a notoriously slow starter.gilgamesh wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:57 Yes
The first red flag to me that something was off was when I saw DraftKings offering bonuses for anyone that bet Joshua to win by KO in the first 2 rounds. There's no real reason why they would've offered that kinda bonus unless they KNEW it wasn't going to happen.
There was a lot of "AJ will knock him out with his first jab etc" talk going around, which was rightfully not taken seriously.
Yeah, those ones like Ali-Inoki were never actual boxing fights. They were pretty much sideshow performances so they're fine. Inoki wasn't gonna appear on Ali's record as an actual opponent. Mayweather-McGregor was a clear carry job. I am surprised so many people were so accepting of it to be honest. It is obvious Mayweather was treating it as a sparring session.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:07
It's been happening since the Jack Johnson days and before, but back then and all the way through to recently they were classed as exhibitions. I have no problem with Ali-Inoki, Jack Johnson-Frank Gotch, Dempsey-George Godfrey etc, because they were exhibitions. Mayweather-McGregor and Paul-Joshua being sanctioned is unforgivable.
Ali and Inoki didn't box though. I'm not sure what Johnson and Gotch did, I assume some sorta Boxing/Wrestling hybrid?keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:07
It's been happening since the Jack Johnson days and before, but back then and all the way through to recently they were classed as exhibitions. I have no problem with Ali-Inoki, Jack Johnson-Frank Gotch, Dempsey-George Godfrey etc, because they were exhibitions. Mayweather-McGregor and Paul-Joshua being sanctioned is unforgivable.
Gotta disagree. it's all about attracting new customers. All the bookies do it. Last night my Facebook was filled with ads for bookmakers offering crazy odds on Joshua stoppage and round best etc. When you read the small print, it's all free bets and stuff.gilgamesh wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:57 Yes
The first red flag to me that something was off was when I saw DraftKings offering bonuses for anyone that bet Joshua to win by KO in the first 2 rounds. There's no real reason why they would've offered that kinda bonus unless they KNEW it wasn't going to happen.
If we were talking about a Bowe, Holyfield, Lewis etc I'd be tripping over myself to agree. They'd be looking to have it done within a round.gilgamesh wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 11:04Didn't have to be the first jab, but the first "cutting the ring off, and throw a combination" surely would've ended it.Kilburn wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 11:02Surely they weren't alone in thinking that JP would be on his bike and a bit more, against a notoriously slow starter.gilgamesh wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:57 Yes
The first red flag to me that something was off was when I saw DraftKings offering bonuses for anyone that bet Joshua to win by KO in the first 2 rounds. There's no real reason why they would've offered that kinda bonus unless they KNEW it wasn't going to happen.
There was a lot of "AJ will knock him out with his first jab etc" talk going around, which was rightfully not taken seriously.
He didn't bother attempting that at all until about Round 5.
Even with Jake Paul running, he was wide open to be hit on multiple occasions. Joshua just chose not to punch because that would've made whoever wanted him to carry Paul upset. I strongly suspect it's someone from DraftKings or something like that, that sweetened the pot a little for AJ if he carried the guy.
gilgamesh wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 11:12Ali and Inoki didn't box though. I'm not sure what Johnson and Gotch did, I assume some sorta Boxing/Wrestling hybrid?keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:07
It's been happening since the Jack Johnson days and before, but back then and all the way through to recently they were classed as exhibitions. I have no problem with Ali-Inoki, Jack Johnson-Frank Gotch, Dempsey-George Godfrey etc, because they were exhibitions. Mayweather-McGregor and Paul-Joshua being sanctioned is unforgivable.
Whenever Archie Moore boxed Pro Wrestler Mike Dibease, it went on his record as an official bout. I know there's been some fights where somebody has taken on a Strongman as well, those would certainly have to be considered novelty bouts, but they've been official bouts as well.
But ultimately, I'd say this win does about as much for Joshua's career as George Foreman's thing with The Toronto 5 did for his. Except Joshua made WAYYYYYY more money for this
So yeah. Doesn't do much, if anything for his legacy, but it boosts the living sh*t out of his bank account, and probably doesn't hurt him as far as marketing the Fury-Joshua bout.
Money talks. Not saying it's right but I would image any fighter in history would have taken the same offer if they were around today. But over the years plenty of average fighters have been thrown in way over their heads against fighters a lot better than AJ.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:18Yeah, but Joshua is a proven heavyweight contender. It's a while since any of the top guys fought someone that poor while still near their prime. I suppose Fury-Sefer Seferi would be an example. Fury was coming off a layoff, but that was a absolutely terrible matchmaking. I can't think of another top guy coming off a layoff in the history of boxing who came back against such a complete dumpling.Controversial wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:08I guess it depends how you look at it. HWs pad their records out all the time fighting guys in worse shape and less skilled than JP, are these guys more worthy at being called a "pro boxer" than JP is? He's been training and boxing for 8+ years and has access to the best of everything, trainers, S&C coaches, dieticians, sparring partners, equipment etc.., things that probably 99% of fighters would dream of having and he gets himself into good shape. At some point the YouTube tag became irrelevant, he appears to be more dedicated to boxing than Dave Allen was for many years.
gilgamesh wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 11:12Ali and Inoki didn't box though. I'm not sure what Johnson and Gotch did, I assume some sorta Boxing/Wrestling hybrid?keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:07
It's been happening since the Jack Johnson days and before, but back then and all the way through to recently they were classed as exhibitions. I have no problem with Ali-Inoki, Jack Johnson-Frank Gotch, Dempsey-George Godfrey etc, because they were exhibitions. Mayweather-McGregor and Paul-Joshua being sanctioned is unforgivable.
Yeah, but at least McNeeley was a heavyweight. The other two were cruisers.Controversial wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 11:24Money talks. Not saying it's right but I would image any fighter in history would have taken the same offer if they were around today. But over the years plenty of average fighters have been thrown in way over their heads against fighters a lot better than AJ.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:18Yeah, but Joshua is a proven heavyweight contender. It's a while since any of the top guys fought someone that poor while still near their prime. I suppose Fury-Sefer Seferi would be an example. Fury was coming off a layoff, but that was a absolutely terrible matchmaking. I can't think of another top guy coming off a layoff in the history of boxing who came back against such a complete dumpling.Controversial wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:08
I guess it depends how you look at it. HWs pad their records out all the time fighting guys in worse shape and less skilled than JP, are these guys more worthy at being called a "pro boxer" than JP is? He's been training and boxing for 8+ years and has access to the best of everything, trainers, S&C coaches, dieticians, sparring partners, equipment etc.., things that probably 99% of fighters would dream of having and he gets himself into good shape. At some point the YouTube tag became irrelevant, he appears to be more dedicated to boxing than Dave Allen was for many years.
Peter McNeeley with his very padded record consisting of fighters making their debuts, with no wins or on long losing streaks. He was thrown in as Mike Tysons comeback opponent.
Jake Paul was a Heavyweight last night.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 11:29Yeah, but at least McNeeley was a heavyweight. The other two were cruisers.Controversial wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 11:24Money talks. Not saying it's right but I would image any fighter in history would have taken the same offer if they were around today. But over the years plenty of average fighters have been thrown in way over their heads against fighters a lot better than AJ.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 10:18
Yeah, but Joshua is a proven heavyweight contender. It's a while since any of the top guys fought someone that poor while still near their prime. I suppose Fury-Sefer Seferi would be an example. Fury was coming off a layoff, but that was a absolutely terrible matchmaking. I can't think of another top guy coming off a layoff in the history of boxing who came back against such a complete dumpling.
Peter McNeeley with his very padded record consisting of fighters making their debuts, with no wins or on long losing streaks. He was thrown in as Mike Tysons comeback opponent.
Throughout the 20th century. MOST Heavyweight Champions would be Cruiserweights. Particularly large Heavyweights at the Top of the division is a fairly recent trend.Controversial wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025, 11:54 Recent decades the best HWs were once CWs, Holyfield and Usyk. Of course it was a huge mismatch but how often do we see prospects flattening fighters that have almost zero chance of winning.