Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
In my lifetime - I would say the ones that pop into my head are.
James Oyelbola (RIP).
Michael Holden
Scott Gammer
Jamie TKV.
With an "honourable" mention to Sam Sexton.
James Oyelbola (RIP).
Michael Holden
Scott Gammer
Jamie TKV.
With an "honourable" mention to Sam Sexton.
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
I thought Sexton was better than any of them. A decent boxer and a decent British champion. nathan Gorman was similar standard i think.....and im sure he beats all those listed. But its very subjective, i understand that.
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
I would agree - the reason why I had Sexton there is mainly cos its a case of who did he beat really?
Honourable brave loses to Dereck Chisora, Hughie Fury and David Price.
But his actual wins are pretty poor - Big Larry O is among his better ones, Martin Rogan? Ok - but he was pushing 40 in those fights.
Ability wise - I think he would beat the other 4, but it could very well be argued that Holden and Jamie TKV have better wins on their resume - with a win over Julius Francis (Holden) and Clarke (TKV).
Scott Gammar - it is pretty poor form that his British title fights involved Cruiserweights that he had beaten before and both shown to be short of domestic class.
-
nobleart1978
- Welterweight
- Posts: 722
- Joined: 25 Jun 2015, 16:18
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
Other than Tommy Farr, Henry Cooper Joe Bugner & Lennox Lewis they've all been fair to poor.
-
JamesPhilips
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6453
- Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
Tyson Fury?nobleart1978 wrote: ↑01 Apr 2026, 10:37 Other than Tommy Farr, Henry Cooper Joe Bugner & Lennox Lewis they've all been fair to poor.
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
X2
Sam vs Nathan would be a pick em if both were in their prime, and both I would pick to beat TKV.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13363
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
I don’t think Nathan Gorman beats any of the guys mentioned. I always thought he was very over rated.
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
Me neitherjameswilson wrote: ↑02 Apr 2026, 10:13 I don’t think Nathan Gorman beats any of the guys mentioned. I always thought he was very over rated.
-
SeanBrennan
- Bantamweight
- Posts: 9664
- Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
Is Gorman retired?Coco wrote: ↑02 Apr 2026, 13:06Me neitherjameswilson wrote: ↑02 Apr 2026, 10:13 I don’t think Nathan Gorman beats any of the guys mentioned. I always thought he was very over rated.
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
Gorman was strictly English title level and was never going to win at British title level.
When I think back to the build up to Dubois v Gorman it's absurd that anyone gave Gorman even half a chance.
When I think back to the build up to Dubois v Gorman it's absurd that anyone gave Gorman even half a chance.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13363
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
Still remember him sitting ringside for that Dubois fight before he fought him and going ‘he don’t beat me. Not in a month of Sundays.’
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
It was one of the great hype stories !
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
Not sure that’s true. He fought for it twice against Dubois and Wardley. Other people have won it beating Gary Cornish or Mark Krence (no disrespect to those guys).
Re: Lowest standard ever of British Heavyweight Champion
What about Gary Cornish? Where does he sit
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22947
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
-
JamesPhilips
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6453
- Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43