Boxxer suing Lysa Shaa Wasmund MBE

[SeanBrennan]

These kinda threads just feel like legal dramas

Netflix are turning it into a film

And tortious interference sounds someone noncing a turtle.

[johnmanchester]

After the court case has finished i will tell you something that will make you p*ss yourself with laughter.

Cool. When's it finishing?

In the meantime, why not kill some time by answering some of the above questions?

[SeanBrennan]

Why don’t we just wait til the outcome none of us know what will happen

[johnmanchester]

Why don’t we just wait til the outcome none of us know what will happen

This is defamation toward Spud

[SeanBrennan]

Why don’t we just wait til the outcome none of us know what will happen

This is defamation toward Spud

Haha I’d never defame Spud he’s been in the sport for ages I like his posts

[Ruthless-RKO]

[johnmanchester]

Ive just watched the Seconds Out interview that Boxing King is referring to. To me it seemed a weird interview. Not sure how to describe it exactly but the tone and demeanor just seemed strange.

Section about Eubank wasn't convincing at all. Comments about sky seem more like wishful thinking.

Section about bbc deal wasn't convincing either.

Instead of some vague comment about it allegedly being only four fights "but we're still here" (meaning the may 30 event which is the rearranged October event Azim pulled out of) why would you not explicitly say you've got a new longer deal?

Unless of course you don't, and the Azim May 30 is an event you've done a separate deal for in order to make the missed October fight?

If there is a new extended deal then he's not got that across very well. Could maybe do with people advising him on wording and message content. Or having like a briefing sheet the way politicians do.

It's here -

IDK. Maybe just caught him at wrong time and he's very tired here or something. To me this interview doesn't radiate big positive energy.

[maverick23]

Ive just watched the Seconds Out interview that Boxing King is referring to. To me it seemed a weird interview. Not sure how to describe it exactly but the tone and demeanor just seemed strange.

Section about Eubank wasn't convincing at all. Comments about sky seem more like wishful thinking.

Section about bbc deal wasn't convincing either.

Instead of some vague comment about it allegedly being only four fights "but we're still here" (meaning the may 30 event which is the rearranged October event Azim pulled out of) why would you not explicitly say you've got a new longer deal?

Unless of course you don't, and the Azim May 30 is an event you've done a separate deal for in order to make the missed October fight?

If there is a new extended deal then he's not got that across very well. Could maybe do with people advising him on wording and message content. Or having like a briefing sheet the way politicians do.

It's here -

IDK. Maybe just caught him at wrong time and he's very tired here or something. To me this interview doesn't radiate big positive energy.

I listened to a couple of other Shalom interviews and he said the same when asked the BBc deal ‘didn’t you think it was just 4 fights?’ and then evade the question.

Same with the Eubank stuff - wasn’t convincing.

It doesn’t matter though as he’s got c.£15m to look forward to.

[johnmanchester]

I listened to a couple of other Shalom interviews and he said the same when asked the BBc deal ‘didn’t you think it was just 4 fights?’ and then evade the question.

These "journos" are terrible as well though.

Like how do you not immediately follow up with "OK, tell us how many events the deal is for, how many more dates have you got? What's the precise number of events you are contracted to bbc for?"

It's all so silly.

We know it was 4 events - the initial announcement said so, and the bbc website item said so until it was later edited to remove the number. Sports business websites like SportsPro still have the original details up.

We also know the tender sheet that went out specified the deal to be 4 events over 12 months.

If the deal had been renewed or extended, that would be trumpeted everywhere. You're not gonna give these kind of evasive mumble non answers, you're going to say yeah we've got X deal in place or "we're making a big announcement soon"

Azim event clearly a standalone.

DAZN not interested
BBC not extending or renewing it seems

Bakole, Eubank fighting their way out of the roster

Can't imagine Azim wants to stick around either

Don't see any positive news out there about them right now

[Spud MK2]

Don't see any positive news out there about them right now

have to agree

[johnmanchester]

Don't see any positive news out there about them right now

have to agree

If they've lost your support then they are truly doomed

I saw your photos thread, you've obviously been around the industry a long time - what made you warm on boxxer and what now has made you go cold on them?

[Spud MK2]

The first sign i started to get suspicious when Shalom announced he bwas becoming a sports agent

I am
Completely convinced he will win the court case ... the evidence of wrong doing against him is outrageous and please trust me shalom will win millions..

But what the key qusestion is what will be left fir shalom to pick up the pieces.

[johnmanchester]

The first sign i started to get suspicious when Shalom announced he bwas becoming a sports agent

I am
Completely convinced he will win the court case ... the evidence of wrong doing against him is outrageous and please trust me shalom will win millions..

But what the key qusestion is what will be left fir shalom to pick up the pieces.

I've yet to see any of the evidence but really cannot see his case going anywhere. But I guess we will see, eventually.

Agree re the rest

[Spud MK2]

Every now and again the bully doesnt win.

Just because someone is naive, inexperienced and a nightmare to work with does not give the excuse for people the excuse to take the law into
The lawninto their own hands.

It is my belief if sky taken the correct HR route when shaloms weakenes were highlighted there would be no
Case to annswer

[Spud MK2]

One of the keys is shslom proving wrong doimg happened before sky toldbthem
They
Were not remew
Ing the contract with boxxer ... that one crucial par of the case was unequivocally in favour of shslom

[johnmanchester]

It is my belief if sky taken the correct HR route when shaloms weakenes were highlighted there would be no
Case to annswer

HR is for employees. There is no HR route for someone who isn't an employee, let alone that person being CEO of a separate company.

[Ruthless-RKO]

[Spud MK2]

Justtice will becserved.

[Spud MK2]

Theres s few people wh have l
Allowed their lust of thevpound note to severely underestimate and cloud their judgement and the importance of doing things correctly.

Just because in my opinion shalom is a nightmare țo lget on with which results in people becoming severely frsudtrated again doesn't give people the excuse to shaft him