Small urnout less than half last years apparently about 60,000.smiling assassin wrote: ↑16 May 2026, 18:06No but a few of my mates went and said they had a good day. They said the majority of the people attending were normal bods but there was quite a few pricks there for a piss up and general muggy behavior. In the main though they said it was a good crowd
Londonistan
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16376
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Londonistan
Re: Londonistan
Coco wrote: ↑16 May 2026, 17:59 The East end has more issues with hipsters than Muslims.
The East end has always been a melting pot, while traditionally white immigrants, none were local, then the immigrants were mainly non white, now many of the immigrants are posh hipsters.
The original white immigrants families have moved out to Essex
-
smiling assassin
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3196
- Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12
Re: Londonistan
I wouldn’t take a blind bit of notice on the numbers been reported Roy, we all know the media lie about how many people turn out to these marchesNightmare Roy wrote: ↑16 May 2026, 20:14Small urnout less than half last years apparently about 60,000.smiling assassin wrote: ↑16 May 2026, 18:06No but a few of my mates went and said they had a good day. They said the majority of the people attending were normal bods but there was quite a few pricks there for a piss up and general muggy behavior. In the main though they said it was a good crowd
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Londonistan
My mrs was with the other march, said both were fairly small crowds compared to other events. Nobody was expecting a massive turnout.Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑16 May 2026, 20:14Small urnout less than half last years apparently about 60,000.smiling assassin wrote: ↑16 May 2026, 18:06No but a few of my mates went and said they had a good day. They said the majority of the people attending were normal bods but there was quite a few pricks there for a piss up and general muggy behavior. In the main though they said it was a good crowd
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100664
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Londonistan
This is brilliant
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Londonistan
Led by donkeys are class.
The one where they had that massive banner begind Farage, fornicating hilarious.
The one where they had that massive banner begind Farage, fornicating hilarious.
Re: Londonistan
Put a few images of singers and athletes up and say immigration makes Britain brilliant. How predictable. No pictures of Somalis stabbing innocent people outside synagogues; terrorists bombing kids at concerts; asylum seekers harrassing girls in school uniform; or taxi drivers raping children or plying young girls with dugs. Strange, that.
But then you people sit there cheering as your country is ruined and overrun, and everything that your forebears worked for and built up is used, abused and pissed away. Idiocy without bounds.
But then you people sit there cheering as your country is ruined and overrun, and everything that your forebears worked for and built up is used, abused and pissed away. Idiocy without bounds.
-
smiling assassin
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3196
- Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12
Re: Londonistan
It baffles me mate how people don’t or don’t want to see it.Jaguar wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 08:22 Put a few images of singers and athletes up and say immigration makes Britain brilliant. How predictable. No pictures of Somalis stabbing innocent people outside synagogues; terrorists bombing kids at concerts; asylum seekers harrassing girls in school uniform; or taxi drivers raping children or plying young girls with dugs. Strange, that.
But then you people sit there cheering as your country is ruined and overrun, and everything that your forebears worked for and built up is used, abused and pissed away. Idiocy without bounds.
Re: Londonistan
Im annoyed at how we're told to accept every culture other than our own, we're the best and we come first.
Re: Londonistan
It's amazing how many people in the UK, think that the issue that's catapaulting Reform to electoral success will eventually fade away and be replaced by more pressing needs for the avg voter. The problem isn't going to go away it's only going to get worse.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16376
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Londonistan
Reform want foreign invaders, rich one's who will help strip Britain to the bone.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16376
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Londonistan
No
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16376
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Londonistan
Whataboutery of the highest order. Immigration has ruined what was a fantastic country. It's no cause for celebration.Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 10:50Reform want foreign invaders, rich one's who will help strip Britain to the bone.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16376
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Londonistan
Started by the Tories who make up half of Reform and he does want rich foreign invaders, hes taking bribes of them.Jaguar wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 11:47Whataboutery of the highest order. Immigration has ruined what was a fantastic country. It's no cause for celebration.Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 10:50Reform want foreign invaders, rich one's who will help strip Britain to the bone.
Re: Londonistan
I'm perfectly aware of that, Roy, and I'm also no fan of Reform.Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 11:59
Started by the Tories who make up half of Reform and he does want rich foreign invaders, hes taking bribes of them.Jaguar wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 11:47Whataboutery of the highest order. Immigration has ruined what was a fantastic country. It's no cause for celebration.Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 10:50
Reform want foreign invaders, rich one's who will help strip Britain to the bone.
If the mainstream political parties actually did something about immigration they'd cut the ground out from underneath Reform, which would be good. It would also improve the lot of the British people, which is no small matter either.
Making quips about Farage and billionaires etc. won't cut it anymore. People want action.
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7431
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Londonistan
The term doesn't even make sense. The "istan" suffix just means "land of" (i.e. Afghanistan is "land of afghans") so this means "land of London" or I guess "land of Londoners".jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑16 May 2026, 09:28 I live in London, and in inner london too - it has it's problems, as do other major cities.
There are things need fixing, same can be said of it's other international rivals.
The whole 'Londonistan' bollocks is usually from people who don't live here, and either never have, or very briefly.
I don't know many native londoners who grew up here use that ridiculous phrase.
"Canuckistan" for Canada makes much more sense and is much funnier.
Re: Londonistan
istan as a suffix is supposed to mean it's overrun by jihadi extremists that you wouldn't want in your communities. Londonistan.jujigatame wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 16:11The term doesn't even make sense. The "istan" suffix just means "land of" (i.e. Afghanistan is "land of afghans") so this means "land of London" or I guess "land of Londoners".jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑16 May 2026, 09:28 I live in London, and in inner london too - it has it's problems, as do other major cities.
There are things need fixing, same can be said of it's other international rivals.
The whole 'Londonistan' bollocks is usually from people who don't live here, and either never have, or very briefly.
I don't know many native londoners who grew up here use that ridiculous phrase.
"Canuckistan" for Canada makes much more sense and is much funnier.
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7431
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Londonistan
If you're an ignoramus, I suppose.Ricky wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 16:16istan as a suffix is supposed to mean it's overrun by jihadi extremists that you wouldn't want in your communities. Londonistan.jujigatame wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 16:11The term doesn't even make sense. The "istan" suffix just means "land of" (i.e. Afghanistan is "land of afghans") so this means "land of London" or I guess "land of Londoners".jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑16 May 2026, 09:28 I live in London, and in inner london too - it has it's problems, as do other major cities.
There are things need fixing, same can be said of it's other international rivals.
The whole 'Londonistan' bollocks is usually from people who don't live here, and either never have, or very briefly.
I don't know many native londoners who grew up here use that ridiculous phrase.
"Canuckistan" for Canada makes much more sense and is much funnier.
-
high tower 1
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 1590
- Joined: 04 Aug 2018, 09:36
Re: Londonistan
It’s far from bollocks. Look at the entire east end. It are 100% Londonistan. And the native Londoners there have all been forced out.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑16 May 2026, 09:28 I live in London, and in inner london too - it has it's problems, as do other major cities.
There are things need fixing, same can be said of it's other international rivals.
The whole 'Londonistan' bollocks is usually from people who don't live here, and either never have, or very briefly.
I don't know many native londoners who grew up here use that ridiculous phrase.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16376
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Londonistan
Actually the majority sold up and moved to Wanstead, Snaresbrook, Woodford, Loughton etc.high tower 1 wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 17:02It’s far from bollocks. Look at the entire east end. It are 100% Londonistan. And the native Londoners there have all been forced out.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑16 May 2026, 09:28 I live in London, and in inner london too - it has it's problems, as do other major cities.
There are things need fixing, same can be said of it's other international rivals.
The whole 'Londonistan' bollocks is usually from people who don't live here, and either never have, or very briefly.
I don't know many native londoners who grew up here use that ridiculous phrase.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Londonistan
'The entire east end. Utter cobblers.
-
bmw hector
- Minimumweight
- Posts: 517
- Joined: 24 Jul 2025, 16:33
Re: Londonistan
Bloody foreigners coming in and bastardising the great english language. It are a disgrace.Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 17:27Actually the majority sold up and moved to Wanstead, Snaresbrook, Woodford, Loughton etc.high tower 1 wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 17:02It’s far from bollocks. Look at the entire east end. It are 100% Londonistan. And the native Londoners there have all been forced out.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑16 May 2026, 09:28 I live in London, and in inner london too - it has it's problems, as do other major cities.
There are things need fixing, same can be said of it's other international rivals.
The whole 'Londonistan' bollocks is usually from people who don't live here, and either never have, or very briefly.
I don't know many native londoners who grew up here use that ridiculous phrase.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100664
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Londonistan
Said he would ‘stop Islam’
What??
Oh and after saying he had nowhere to go, after this interview. He flew back to his home in Spain.
I mean. Who gives this moron a platform?
Didn’t England colonise like half the world?
