What were the "Worst' Heavy-Weight "Title' defenses ?

Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18479
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: What were the "Worst' Heavy-Weight "Title' defenses ?

Post by Caractacus »

This fight was broadcast LIVE to 20 television stations across the USA.
yet another '10 to 1" challenger for the title.
(anyone know who had fought on the preliminary ?, if anyone)
-April 1969-

BTW This may have been the only fight(pro or amateur)
where Joe Frazier actually had the "reach advantage- 73.5" to 71.5" inches.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16747
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: What were the "Worst' Heavy-Weight "Title' defenses ?

Post by keithmoonhangover »

gilgamesh wrote: 19 May 2026, 13:54 It definitely turned out to be a mismatch in the ring, but it wasn't that bad of a mismatch on paper. Marvis was an unbeaten Pro with some decent wins, and had been a decorated Amateur in his own right.

I don't think anybody really thought he could beat Larry, but I doubt many would've been predicted a 1st round demolition job. Larry wasn't really known for that sorta thing. It just be that way sometimes. That's what makes Boxing what it is. Anything can happen on any given night.
Well said. :TU:
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39200
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: What were the "Worst' Heavy-Weight "Title' defenses ?

Post by margaret thatcher »

Caractacus wrote: 19 May 2026, 15:21 This fight was broadcast LIVE to 20 television stations across the USA.
yet another '10 to 1" challenger for the title.
(anyone know who had fought on the preliminary ?, if anyone)
-April 1969-

BTW This may have been the only fight(pro or amateur)
where Joe Frazier actually had the "reach advantage- 73.5" to 71.5" inches.
even just a 30 second browse of his record shows that frazier had the reach advantage several times
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18479
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: What were the "Worst' Heavy-Weight "Title' defenses ?

Post by Caractacus »

This challenger (almost) had to have been brought INTO the ring on a stretcher to fight !
(another "10 to 1".
btw " Have You Ever Seen a Ghost Walking" ?
-1940-
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18479
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: What were the "Worst' Heavy-Weight "Title' defenses ?

Post by Caractacus »

-1973-
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18479
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: What were the "Worst' Heavy-Weight "Title' defenses ?

Post by Caractacus »

margaret thatcher wrote: 20 May 2026, 12:54
Caractacus wrote: 19 May 2026, 15:21
BTW This may have been the only fight(pro or amateur)
where Joe Frazier actually had the "reach advantage- 73.5" to 71.5" inches.
even just a 30 second browse of his record shows that frazier had the reach advantage several times
Well, I just made that comment on it because I had figured that perhaps not everyone who posts
on here are as "Sharp" as you are.
CONGRAGULATIONS !
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18479
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: What were the "Worst' Heavy-Weight "Title' defenses ?

Post by Caractacus »

This may not be one of the actual worst by a long shot, but let's face it Rocky Marciano did not look his usual best in it.
-1955-
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15644
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: What were the "Worst' Heavy-Weight "Title' defenses ?

Post by elmersalsa »

gilgamesh wrote: 19 May 2026, 13:54 It definitely turned out to be a mismatch in the ring, but it wasn't that bad of a mismatch on paper. Marvis was an unbeaten Pro with some decent wins, and had been a decorated Amateur in his own right.

I don't think anybody really thought he could beat Larry, but I doubt many would've been predicted a 1st round demolition job. Larry wasn't really known for that sorta thing. It just be that way sometimes. That's what makes Boxing what it is. Anything can happen on any given night.
Larry Holmes said that he was in the prime of his life and didn't want to hurt nobody. This was probably the worst mismatch that I have ever seen in boxing. Worse than his title defense against Muhammad Ali three years earlier.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15097
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: What were the "Worst' Heavy-Weight "Title' defenses ?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Holmes was past his prime by the time he fought Frazier.
Frazier was not that bad. He had some boxing skills. However, he didn't have a great chin and didn't have much power. He actually beat a couple of decent opponents.
Always thought if they fought a gain that Frazier could have lasted a few rounds.
hhaehre
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6400
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 07:26

Re: What were the "Worst' Heavy-Weight "Title' defenses ?

Post by hhaehre »

Caractacus wrote: 20 May 2026, 16:08
margaret thatcher wrote: 20 May 2026, 12:54
Caractacus wrote: 19 May 2026, 15:21
BTW This may have been the only fight(pro or amateur)
where Joe Frazier actually had the "reach advantage- 73.5" to 71.5" inches.
even just a 30 second browse of his record shows that frazier had the reach advantage several times
Well, I just made that comment on it because I had figured that perhaps not everyone who posts
on here are as "Sharp" as you are.
CONGRAGULATIONS !
I'm not sure he needs the "CONGRAGULATIONS". It's not like proving you wrong is a massive accomplishment, almost anyone can do it.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46233
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: What were the "Worst' Heavy-Weight "Title' defenses ?

Post by gilgamesh »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 21 May 2026, 20:27 Holmes was past his prime by the time he fought Frazier.
Frazier was not that bad. He had some boxing skills. However, he didn't have a great chin and didn't have much power. He actually beat a couple of decent opponents.
Always thought if they fought a gain that Frazier could have lasted a few rounds.
He definitely couldn't have done much worse in a rematch :lol:
Post Reply