I agree with you, we shouldn’t have to rewatch fights and manually count punches ourselves. But Jabbr is miles better than CompuBox. Why boxing still doesn’t use it properly is beyond me.joshj909 wrote: ↑24 May 2026, 05:36Ok, go and count them yourselves and come back and tell us what you saw. It's not an absolute authoritative metric but it's all we have.Heldenjaeger wrote: ↑24 May 2026, 05:35joshj909 wrote: ↑24 May 2026, 05:20
I wonder how much if that was due to the commentators and Copp's scorecards. Whenever they showed the punch stats the commentary team were shocked that Usyk had actually been out landing Rico for much if the fight. I suspect that they were counting punches that hadn't been landing and were getting ahead of themselves. Either that or Turki made sure everyone legitimised the fight. Usyk won more rounds than the production were giving him credit for and I think that influenced a lot of people's decisions.
For example, Copp gave Verhoeven round 5...
![]()
CompuBox is crap and honestly we should stop pretending it’s some authoritative metric. Half the time punches hitting gloves get counted as clean connects. It’s literally old guys with two-second reaction times mashing buttons at ringside at 1am trying to track exchanges in real time.
There’s no reason boxing should still rely on that in 2026. Let’s be honest with ourselves.
And I’m not even talking about the AI scoring side of it, although honestly that was already more competent than a lot of elite judges two years ago. At the very least, use the punch tracking instead of relying on a few old and tired humans pressing buttons in real time.
