Felix Trinidad versus Bud Crawford

Post Reply
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

Felix Trinidad versus Bud Crawford

Post by goose 5 »

154. 12 rounds
gilgamesh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 47231
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Felix Trinidad versus Bud Crawford

Post by gilgamesh »

It's hard to imagine Tito beating many Elite Boxers considering that Winky Wright beat him with tight defense and a jab.
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3624
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: Felix Trinidad versus Bud Crawford

Post by Cent0089 »

Crawford UD, something like 116-112
Les Norton
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 413
Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 18:11

Re: Felix Trinidad versus Bud Crawford

Post by Les Norton »

gilgamesh wrote: 18 Aug 2026, 13:25 It's hard to imagine Tito beating many Elite Boxers considering that Winky Wright beat him with tight defense and a jab.
So true
Jeff_lacy_ko
Lightweight
Posts: 5721
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Felix Trinidad versus Bud Crawford

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

gilgamesh wrote: 18 Aug 2026, 13:25 It's hard to imagine Tito beating many Elite Boxers considering that Winky Wright beat him with tight defense and a jab.
Humiliated him really

Agreed tito was fun but against hof competition he looked ordinary
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17248
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Felix Trinidad versus Bud Crawford

Post by Seamus »

He never lost below Middleweight, so that argument only applies to 160.
gilgamesh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 47231
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Felix Trinidad versus Bud Crawford

Post by gilgamesh »

Seamus wrote: 24 Aug 2026, 16:37 He never lost below Middleweight, so that argument only applies to 160.
Tito's record at 160 and beyond is 2-3 though to Crawford's 1-0.

Crawford won the Undisputed Super Middleweight title. Tito won the WBA Middleweight belt and promptly lost it. Which to be fair Crawford may have too if he had to deal with Hopkins.
2128778
Light Flyweight
Posts: 335
Joined: 21 Aug 2025, 15:07

Re: Felix Trinidad versus Bud Crawford

Post by 2128778 »

gilgamesh wrote: 24 Aug 2026, 19:15
Seamus wrote: 24 Aug 2026, 16:37 He never lost below Middleweight, so that argument only applies to 160.
Tito's record at 160 and beyond is 2-3 though to Crawford's 1-0.

Crawford won the Undisputed Super Middleweight title. Tito won the WBA Middleweight belt and promptly lost it. Which to be fair Crawford may have too if he had to deal with Hopkins.
Since the topic is about them facing at 154lbs... I'm curious, what the odds would've been, if Crawford goes into Tito fight right after that Madrimov performance.

At the same time, Trinidad would be coming off a stellar 2000 campaign, which made him a consensus Millennium's Fighter of the year.

Just interesting about the pre-fight perception. How many of those who would've predicted Crawford is past it based on Madrimov fight and that "Trinidad is too young, too big!"
gilgamesh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 47231
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Felix Trinidad versus Bud Crawford

Post by gilgamesh »

2128778 wrote: 25 Aug 2026, 03:15
gilgamesh wrote: 24 Aug 2026, 19:15
Seamus wrote: 24 Aug 2026, 16:37 He never lost below Middleweight, so that argument only applies to 160.
Tito's record at 160 and beyond is 2-3 though to Crawford's 1-0.

Crawford won the Undisputed Super Middleweight title. Tito won the WBA Middleweight belt and promptly lost it. Which to be fair Crawford may have too if he had to deal with Hopkins.
Since the topic is about them facing at 154lbs... I'm curious, what the odds would've been, if Crawford goes into Tito fight right after that Madrimov performance.

At the same time, Trinidad would be coming off a stellar 2000 campaign, which made him a consensus Millennium's Fighter of the year.

Just interesting about the pre-fight perception. How many of those who would've predicted Crawford is past it based on Madrimov fight and that "Trinidad is too young, too big!"
Indeed. "You're only as good as your last fight" as they say, and the guy that's steamrolling and knocking out his opponents is often gonna be perceived as the tougher opponent over a guy who just struggled to a difficult decision win.
2128778
Light Flyweight
Posts: 335
Joined: 21 Aug 2025, 15:07

Re: Felix Trinidad versus Bud Crawford

Post by 2128778 »

gilgamesh wrote: 25 Aug 2026, 04:11
2128778 wrote: 25 Aug 2026, 03:15
gilgamesh wrote: 24 Aug 2026, 19:15

Tito's record at 160 and beyond is 2-3 though to Crawford's 1-0.

Crawford won the Undisputed Super Middleweight title. Tito won the WBA Middleweight belt and promptly lost it. Which to be fair Crawford may have too if he had to deal with Hopkins.
Since the topic is about them facing at 154lbs... I'm curious, what the odds would've been, if Crawford goes into Tito fight right after that Madrimov performance.

At the same time, Trinidad would be coming off a stellar 2000 campaign, which made him a consensus Millennium's Fighter of the year.

Just interesting about the pre-fight perception. How many of those who would've predicted Crawford is past it based on Madrimov fight and that "Trinidad is too young, too big!"
Indeed. "You're only as good as your last fight" as they say, and the guy that's steamrolling and knocking out his opponents is often gonna be perceived as the tougher opponent over a guy who just struggled to a difficult decision win.
Exactly. And by the way, wasn't Trinidad bookie's favourite in the Hopkins bout?
gilgamesh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 47231
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Felix Trinidad versus Bud Crawford

Post by gilgamesh »

He was the favorite against Wright also
2128778
Light Flyweight
Posts: 335
Joined: 21 Aug 2025, 15:07

Re: Felix Trinidad versus Bud Crawford

Post by 2128778 »

gilgamesh wrote: 25 Aug 2026, 11:37 He was the favorite against Wright also
Which seems amazing, in hindsight.

As I think of it now, is that performance against Mayorga was more impressive than two wins over Mosley?
Post Reply