As another reply, fair enoughBigEars wrote: ↑Today, 06:03The first one you could start with Taylor being the highest profile amateur fighter in her time, and the one who was pushing hardest to get it into the Olympics, without her that may not have happened nearly as soon as it did (if at all).
The Olympic profile was very important for building many female pro fighters careers after.
When she turned pro, Matchroom/Sky gave her far more media attention than any female boxer in Ireland/UK had ever gotten by a considerable distance.
There's no question this would have helped inspire young female boxers, and also Taylor was earning better purses than the vast majority of female fighters had.
That also helped break a glass ceiling for the concept of paying female fighters decent purses.
Now maybe some here would feel better if it wasn't this way, but without her we wouldn't be seeing nearly as much professional female boxing on TV as we do, and that quantity of coverage and money is bringing the standard of female boxing up all the time.
For example Shannen Courtenay wouldn't have a hope of winning a World title now, but waltzed into one just a few short years ago.
Round-by-Round: Katie Taylor vs. Flora Pili | DAZN - 5 September 2026
Re: Round-by-Round: Katie Taylor vs. Flora Pili | DAZN - 5 September 2026
-
JamesPhilips
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6713
- Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43
Re: Round-by-Round: Katie Taylor vs. Flora Pili | DAZN - 5 September 2026
Most of that has nothing to do with Taylor but has more to do with her promoters and marketing team. As well as just being in the right place at the right time with the media seeking to push certain agendas including female empowerment. And I don’t believe for a minute she pretended to be a boy to get fights. No way would the amateur coaches and the local community not know she’s a girl - the boxing club she trained would be severely sanctioned for letting a girl fight a boy. No way would they risk their status like that.BigEars wrote: ↑Today, 06:03The first one you could start with Taylor being the highest profile amateur fighter in her time, and the one who was pushing hardest to get it into the Olympics, without her that may not have happened nearly as soon as it did (if at all).
The Olympic profile was very important for building many female pro fighters careers after.
When she turned pro, Matchroom/Sky gave her far more media attention than any female boxer in Ireland/UK had ever gotten by a considerable distance.
There's no question this would have helped inspire young female boxers, and also Taylor was earning better purses than the vast majority of female fighters had.
That also helped break a glass ceiling for the concept of paying female fighters decent purses.
Now maybe some here would feel better if it wasn't this way, but without her we wouldn't be seeing nearly as much professional female boxing on TV as we do, and that quantity of coverage and money is bringing the standard of female boxing up all the time.
For example Shannen Courtenay wouldn't have a hope of winning a World title now, but waltzed into one just a few short years ago.
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5532
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Round-by-Round: Katie Taylor vs. Flora Pili | DAZN - 5 September 2026
Skipped through the event this morning. Some spectacle, but a crappy card
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 103917
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Round-by-Round: Katie Taylor vs. Flora Pili | DAZN - 5 September 2026
Reported fight purses from Katie Taylor’s Croke Park card:
Katie Taylor: ~£4m
Flora Pili: ~£750k
Paddy Donovan: ~£200k
Tyrone McKenna: ~£100k
Dave Allen: ~£150k
Carty: ~£75k
Taylor Bevan: ~£75k
Emmet Brennan: ~£60k
McCann: ~£75k
Sylwia Doligala: ~£20k
The GWOAT
Katie Taylor: ~£4m
Flora Pili: ~£750k
Paddy Donovan: ~£200k
Tyrone McKenna: ~£100k
Dave Allen: ~£150k
Carty: ~£75k
Taylor Bevan: ~£75k
Emmet Brennan: ~£60k
McCann: ~£75k
Sylwia Doligala: ~£20k
The GWOAT
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5532
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Round-by-Round: Katie Taylor vs. Flora Pili | DAZN - 5 September 2026
Wow. Pill got 750k for that?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23205
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Round-by-Round: Katie Taylor vs. Flora Pili | DAZN - 5 September 2026
Highly unlikely. Someone just makes it up and Ruthless reposts it on a forum for hardcore fans to laugh it.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 103917
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Round-by-Round: Katie Taylor vs. Flora Pili | DAZN - 5 September 2026
You reckon she got more close to 200k? Or even less than that? I mean it was unification/undisputed, and she’d probably want decent money being Taylor’s last fight.mickey1975 wrote: ↑Today, 15:31Highly unlikely. Someone just makes it up and Ruthless reposts it on a forum for hardcore fans to laugh it.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23205
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Round-by-Round: Katie Taylor vs. Flora Pili | DAZN - 5 September 2026
I really don't know but I'd be surprised if it's anywhere near that.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑Today, 15:54You reckon she got more close to 200k? Or even less than that? I mean it was unification/undisputed, and she’d probably want decent money being Taylor’s last fight.mickey1975 wrote: ↑Today, 15:31Highly unlikely. Someone just makes it up and Ruthless reposts it on a forum for hardcore fans to laugh it.
-
CaptainSpacerod
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21
Re: Round-by-Round: Katie Taylor vs. Flora Pili | DAZN - 5 September 2026
It’s exactly as Mickey says, “reported” purses for fighters are just made up. I listen to a few podcasts and even well respected boxing “insiders”, the likes of Chris Mannix, Dan Rafael, Matt Christie etc, don’t know the purses for any given fight.