I quite enjoyed Benn v Eubank 1. The bottom line is we all knew why Hearns was putting Benn in with semi washed up old men and never even when near a half decent domestic welterweightlondonwar wrote: ↑Yesterday, 10:07Heldenjaeger wrote: ↑Yesterday, 05:34I don't think Eubank is a great example here. He was actually competitive at a high level, picked up a few good wins and was part of the WBSS.
Benn has zero credible wins, went life and death with a journeyman and just got stopped in two rounds by a former lightweight.
I was thinking more in terms of hype behind the two Eubank- Benn fights. Very similar to the Haye v Bellew fights. You've got four fights there generating huge amounts of money off the back of fans believing these were some kind of super fights. They were pretty dull in reality
They played the marketing role well, built up this incredible media attention around him.
As we clearly saw, he is nowhere near world level, but for a guy with zero amateur experience and only starting boxing a decade ago, I'd say he has done pretty well to be at the level he's at now.
The first Eubank fight showed he is a tough bugger with plenty of guts and he obviously trains hard.
People say he's a nice fella off camera, comes across badly on it