Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Expug
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4595
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 18:40

Re: Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Post by Expug »

Victor Vale was Cooneys trainer and it seemed as though they had a certain bond. If not a father/son type relationship, maybe a close friendship.
This can sometimes be detrimental.
Maybe Gerry could have developed a bit better if he had a different trainer. Maybe. I’m not sure how he could’ve fought much differently. Possibly better footwork, maybe move his head more. But he was always gonna rely on that big left hook. Body , head.
Cooneys obstacle was Jones and Rappaport.
Caractacus
Middleweight
Posts: 18870
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Post by Caractacus »

BTW Dennis Rappaport (of The Wacko Twins) has just published his autobiography.
anyone here read it yet ?
here is a link about it.
https://iamrappaport.com
goose 5
Lightweight
Posts: 6360
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

Re: Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Post by goose 5 »

I knew Cooney's personal matchmaker very well. He always defended Cooney's opponents when the allegations of soft matchmaking were leveled. Cooney's bad left shoulder was worse than was ever publicly disclosed.
keithmoonhangover
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17426
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Post by keithmoonhangover »

goose 5 wrote: ↑03 Sep 2026, 19:15 I knew Cooney's personal matchmaker very well. He always defended Cooney's opponents when the allegations of soft matchmaking were leveled. Cooney's bad left shoulder was worse than was ever publicly disclosed.
I thought Cooney did well with the skills he had. He only lost to first ballot HOFers, made good money and got out of the sport with most of his brains intact.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15470
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

From a fan's point of view, I think many people wished he would have fought some of the guys like Weaver, Dokes, Coetzee, Witherspoon, Thomas, etc.
But yeah, from health and $ perspective, his managers did a great job for him. I don't think his trainer hurt his cause but it's hard to say.
He did have some ability. He was more competitive against Holmes than most of Holmes' competition was at the time.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17325
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Post by Seamus »

Totally agree with Expug. The Wacko Twins kept Cooney from possibly winning a world title. His punching power was real, but he couldn't hit a moving target. Tillis and Snipes' people were begging for a fight to no avail.
Caractacus
Middleweight
Posts: 18870
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Post by Caractacus »

So why didn't Quick Tillis fight Gerry Cooney and the winner fight Mike Weaver for his title ?
From what I remember reading it was Cooney that was rated 1 and Tillis 2
when Tillis got the shot at a title. Cooney's handlers offered 1 million dollars to him for 'stepping aside" money.
overhand_right
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1160
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 07:25

Re: Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Post by overhand_right »

Caractacus wrote: ↑05 Sep 2026, 11:36 So why didn't Quick Tillis fight Gerry Cooney and the winner fight Mike Weaver for his title ?
From what I remember reading it was Cooney that was rated 1 and Tillis 2
when Tillis got the shot at a title. Cooney's handlers offered 1 million dollars to him for 'stepping aside" money.
Tillis was no 1 contender. Tillis made the call. His then-manager Kaulentis took the 1m offer to him but he refused it, wanted to be champ. A very stupid and short sighted decision which he recognised himself years later.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15470
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Weaver-Cooney would have been interesting. Too bad it never happened.
After the Holmes fight, Cooney seemed to be going back and forth as to whether he want to continue boxing or not.

After the Homes fight, he didn't fight for more than two years. He won a couple of fights and looked decent. Then he didn't fight for two more years. He then blew out Eddie Gregg who wasn't bad. The next year he takes on Michael Spinks and got beaten badly.
Then more than 2 years later fights Foreman and looked terrible and got destroyed again.

He was not as good as some people believed or as bad as his detractors claimed.
overhand_right
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1160
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 07:25

Re: Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Post by overhand_right »

Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑15 Sep 2026, 19:54 Weaver-Cooney would have been interesting. Too bad it never happened.
After the Holmes fight, Cooney seemed to be going back and forth as to whether he want to continue boxing or not.

After the Homes fight, he didn't fight for more than two years. He won a couple of fights and looked decent. Then he didn't fight for two more years. He then blew out Eddie Gregg who wasn't bad. The next year he takes on Michael Spinks and got beaten badly.
Then more than 2 years later fights Foreman and looked terrible and got destroyed again.

He was not as good as some people believed or as bad as his detractors claimed.
You think Cooney looked terrible versus Foreman? That first round I'd argue is the best he ever looked. Seriously.
Caractacus
Middleweight
Posts: 18870
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Post by Caractacus »

According to Gil Clancey (Cooney's then trainer), Cooney stuck to the original fight plan for round one (stick &move)
but for round two Cooney went his usual route and tried to slug it out with Foreman
(Gil Clancey also said Cooney came in too light for the fight)
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15470
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

overhand_right wrote: ↑16 Sep 2026, 10:41
Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑15 Sep 2026, 19:54 Weaver-Cooney would have been interesting. Too bad it never happened.
After the Holmes fight, Cooney seemed to be going back and forth as to whether he want to continue boxing or not.

After the Homes fight, he didn't fight for more than two years. He won a couple of fights and looked decent. Then he didn't fight for two more years. He then blew out Eddie Gregg who wasn't bad. The next year he takes on Michael Spinks and got beaten badly.
Then more than 2 years later fights Foreman and looked terrible and got destroyed again.

He was not as good as some people believed or as bad as his detractors claimed.
You think Cooney looked terrible versus Foreman? That first round I'd argue is the best he ever looked. Seriously.
Just watched the video that Caractus posted. Well Cooney did land some decent shots in the first round. got nailed too much though. And we know what happened in the 2nd round...
Caractacus
Middleweight
Posts: 18870
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Fighters who were hindered by their trainers ?

Post by Caractacus »

Of the punches that Cooney had thrown in those 2 rounds,
how many were rights ?
(Cooney had a really good right, he even knocked out some opponents with it).
Post Reply