The point I was trying to make, in answer to Max's statement that Mayweather should be critised as much as Calzaghe for his choice of opponent is that even if you just take the last five opponents, which includes Calzaghe's biggest win, Mayweather's are still far better than Calzaghe's. That's without taking into account any of Floyd's earlier opponents.Andy Mac wrote:Mixing with the best years previously dont mean shit when you are shot like Gatti and Mitchell. Brusseles is a never was in the first place, Judah is a one punch chicken dancer, so for Baldomir to be on the list is self explanatory, he beat a chinless wonder, and a punch drunk shadow of a man.J-C wrote:Any way you look at it Max of their last five Mayweaher has four who have mixed it at the very top level Calzaghe has one. In you original post you said Mayweather should be critisied as much as Calzaghe for his choice of opponents.
Maywether has fought and beat most of the top men in four divisions, Calzaghe hasn't even fought all the top men in the one division he's been in for over 10 years.
Gatti and Michell were past it, fine but so was Eubank and he was generally considered Calzaghe's best win prior to Lacy. When was the last time Mayweather fought someone like Ashira?