Holyfield/Oquendo

Who wins?

Poll ended at 11 Nov 2006, 13:08

Holyfield
9
64%
Oquendo
5
36%
 
Total votes: 14

lvlarc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1871
Joined: 16 Jan 2005, 02:24

Holyfield/Oquendo

Post by lvlarc »

On PPV tomorrow. Who wins this one then?

Has Holyfield got what it takes to beat Fres Oquendo, big step up from Bates.

If he loses, it's pretty much retire.

Fres didn't look good against Bispo and some say he has a shakey chin.

Holyfield will have the crowd behind him bigtime, which could affect the judges scoring if it goes the distance...

Will Oquendo be too fast and young?

BTW Holyfield is the clear dog +180
lvlarc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1871
Joined: 16 Jan 2005, 02:24

Post by lvlarc »

Quiet on the Holyfield front then eh, I haven't seen any threads on current scene either, yet Tyson's world tour of bums sparked loads of interest...

http://www.boxingtribune.com/images/eholyfield001.jpg

Recent pic.

C'mon Real Deal!
:box: :box:
The Durable Dane
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 113
Joined: 05 Nov 2006, 06:18

Post by The Durable Dane »

Holyfield.. ud
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

No chance, Oquendo is light years ahead of Bates.

Oquendo UD.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Come on!!! Don't believe it, Holyfield is still as shot as he was when he lost to Larry Donald. Can't believe some knowledgeable guys like Graham Houston are buying into this. Holyfield looked like shit whenever he fought decent opposition, he looked good battering Bates because Bates was basically shit, even an ageing Holy can walk through that sort of opponent.

As soon as he moves back in with a live contender he loses!

Hope i don't eat my words :lol:
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Post by states »

Holyfield will get beaten here, I'm sure of it. Jeremy Bates was total crap, and I even thought Holyfield was on the verge of punching himself out before the ref stopped it. Evander is done, done done.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27497
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

I have to admit, I was VERY pleasantly surprised with the movements of Holyfield during the Bates bout. Okay... Bates was a bum, but Holy look decent.

Whether Holy would have sustained it or not is a crucial factor... He looked "Back" for 2 rounds vs Toney. He did seem pretty tired as the ref waved the Bates fight off.

Oquendo has a decent chin and some good skills. Despite his inactivity I do see him as a GENIUNE top ten fighter. If Holyfield beats him, then I will buy his excuse that its been injury that has been his major problem and I would favour him over 2 if not 3 champions.

Massive test for the "new" Evander Holyfield..... If he passes it, he should be considered a serious threat to the title. I believe Oquendo already is.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

Oquendo all the way.
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

Holyfield is shot to shit dont let the Bates fight fool you. Bates is absolute garbage.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Oquendo all the way, might even stop the old warhorse.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

I can see Evander getting stopped in 5 or 6 rounds... he even looked a little shaky when taking some punches from Bates!... he could well get hammered tonight, it won't be pretty...
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6644
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Post by Kilburn »

I fear Holyfield could well end up making Oquendo look devastating here.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

nickd wrote:Holyfield is shot to shit dont let the Bates fight fool you. Bates is absolute garbage.
Exactly what i was getting at!!
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Post by Old bones Ian »

If Oquendo has got himself into decent shape he'll win, maybe by late stoppage.
lvlarc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1871
Joined: 16 Jan 2005, 02:24

Post by lvlarc »

I can't really fault any of your picks but I have a feeling that you will all be eating your own words, or atleast I hope so.
jomothepure
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2660
Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 08:43

Post by jomothepure »

Holyfield wins UD, 116-111 and 114-113 twice. Oquendo KD'd in the 1st.

Apparently a pretty plodding fight. Holy helped by the KD. To quote fightnews Fres had an "awkward workmanlike style." Quite a few close rounds that could have gone either way, so some had Oquendo winning by 3 or 4 but no cries of absolute corruption. However, you do sense Holyfield would have got a decision had he lasted the distance anyway.

"awkward workmanlike style" just about sums up Oquendo. Not made of thrill, but is always a tricky customer, and Holyfield "beat" him. He also picks up the IBF's USBA title.

I don't know what to make of Holy's return, but I know one thing - I don't want him in with a belt holder. I can sadly see Holyfield-Valuev some time next year though, which really would be awful. He (Evander) fights again in January on the Hatton card.
shoutout
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 436
Joined: 25 Jan 2005, 22:27

Post by shoutout »

lvlarc_uk wrote:Quiet on the Holyfield front then eh, I haven't seen any threads on current scene either, yet Tyson's world tour of bums sparked loads of interest...

http://www.boxingtribune.com/images/eholyfield001.jpg

Recent pic.

C'mon Real Deal!
:box: :box:
bottom line does NOT equal "sparking loads of interest"!! :TU:

bottom line=PPV numbers & i paid so little interest to the laughable tyson freakshow i honestly dont know if it was on PPV or not...since i only follow REAL boxing!! :lol: but if that freak show of mikey's was on PPV i guarantee it did far less than holyfield-oquendo!! :TU:
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

I didn't even know Holy was fighting.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27497
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

jomothepure wrote:Holyfield wins UD, 116-111 and 114-113 twice. Oquendo KD'd in the 1st.

Apparently a pretty plodding fight. Holy helped by the KD. To quote fightnews Fres had an "awkward workmanlike style." Quite a few close rounds that could have gone either way, so some had Oquendo winning by 3 or 4 but no cries of absolute corruption. However, you do sense Holyfield would have got a decision had he lasted the distance anyway.

"awkward workmanlike style" just about sums up Oquendo. Not made of thrill, but is always a tricky customer, and Holyfield "beat" him. He also picks up the IBF's USBA title.

I don't know what to make of Holy's return, but I know one thing - I don't want him in with a belt holder. I can sadly see Holyfield-Valuev some time next year though, which really would be awful. He (Evander) fights again in January on the Hatton card.
Well, I disagree.... whilst I am not saying two wins makes Holyfield worthy of a title shot. I think it shows he would be competitive against at least two of the champions.

Oquendo is better than Monte Barrett who gave Valuev a few problems. I would tip Oquendo over Briggs and Maskaev.

The score cards indicate a close fight, so at least Holyfield now appears to be competitive at that level again.
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3340
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Post by Twinkle Toes »

So what do all the Oquendo all the way posters have to say now :)

I'm not getting excited by Holyfield, but credit where it is due.
lvlarc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1871
Joined: 16 Jan 2005, 02:24

Post by lvlarc »

Well most of you were way off. Not once did Holyfield come close to getting stopped. In the opening seconds Holyfield's first punch thrown knocked Oquendo down. Overrall a dull slow fight that suited Holy. Oquendo was moving around alot and refused to trade, mostly jabbing and throwing rights at range. Holy would do better when he got inside, alot of close rounds but by no means a robbery. Though 116-111 was stretching it. Evander said he plans on returning in Janurary.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

Well lets be honest, Fres is hardly the next Ali is he, I think much of it is down to Fres being so bad rather than Evander being so good. Credit to Holyfield he does seem to have got into great shape and the rest has probably recharged his batteries a bit but I think once he steps up to title level he'll come unstuck, though having said that if he gets a shot at Briggs I'd give him a chance of winning that one...
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

lvlarc_uk wrote:Evander said he plans on retiring in Janurary.
Nice one
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

silkov wrote:Well lets be honest, Fres is hardly the next Ali is he, I think much of it is down to Fres being so bad rather than Evander being so good. Credit to Holyfield he does seem to have got into great shape and the rest has probably recharged his batteries a bit but I think once he steps up to title level he'll come unstuck, though having said that if he gets a shot at Briggs I'd give him a chance of winning that one...
Not seen it yet. But I can't believe Evander - as he is now - would have been put in with a customer as tricky / ugly as Oquendo.
lvlarc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1871
Joined: 16 Jan 2005, 02:24

Post by lvlarc »

That's pretty funny, a few on here didn't give Holy a chance of beating Bates. Holy got the job done. Again, almost everyone on here were saying Oquendo will win, most likely by stoppage.

Fres is a decent fighter capable of beating top 20 guys. This was a big step up for Holy and he passed, not once did Evander look like being stopped. Not many gave Holy a chance of beating Bowe or Tyson either.

Please, credit where it's due.
Post Reply