Don McCorkindale vs George Cook. Colour line question.

Post Reply
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Don McCorkindale vs George Cook. Colour line question.

Post by KOJOE90 »

In October of 1932 Heavyweight Don McCorkindale of South Africa fought George Cook of Australia at the Royal Albert Hall, London, England.

The above two were white fighters and in 1932 the UK Colour Line was still very much in effect which stopped black fighters fighting for a British Title (but were allowed to box for the British Empire/Commonwealth Title I believe).

My question is as crazy as it sounds I've read that the above fight was a British Title Eliminator. Is this true?

http://www.boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=59356

Thanks in advance fight fans. :box:
Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Re: Don McCorkindale vs George Cook. Colour line question.

Post by Collins2000 »

KOJOE90 wrote:In October of 1932 Heavyweight Don McCorkindale of South Africa fought George Cook of Australia at the Royal Albert Hall, London, England.

The above two were white fighters and in 1932 the UK Colour Line was still very much in effect which stopped black fighters fighting for a British Title (but were allowed to box for the British Empire/Commonwealth Title I believe).

My question is as crazy as it sounds I've read that the above fight was a British Title Eliminator. Is this true?

http://www.boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=59356

Thanks in advance fight fans. :box:

Until 1949 Australians and South Africans were British subjects. I assume this is the reason why they could contest British titles (as long as they were white, of course).

It's also possible they were eligible through one or more parents being British. In recent times fighters like Barry McGuigan have fought for the British title while being citizens of another country.
john2345
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 471
Joined: 24 Feb 2005, 14:35

Post by john2345 »

Actually (to the best of my knowledge) Barry was a British subject having claimed that status via his father's birth in Northern Ireland (as part of the UK). If I'm wrong then Ok, but let's not start another "John Duddy is Irish" style thread!

J
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Re: Don McCorkindale vs George Cook. Colour line question.

Post by KOJOE90 »

Collins2000 wrote:Until 1949 Australians and South Africans were British subjects. I assume this is the reason why they could contest British titles (as long as they were white, of course)..
Fair point, but I can understand this allowing them to fight for the Commonwealth Title or British Empire Title as it was then called, but British Title? I honestly don't know. Does anyone here have the answer?
Collins2000 wrote:It's also possible they were eligible through one or more parents being British.
This is what I assumed to be honest.
Cap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1513
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 11:44

Post by Cap »

Things were a lot different then. If you were a British subject it was almost the equivalent of being born there. As for being white, from his pictures, I believe George Cook was at least half aborigine, and so would not have been accepted in "polite" society.

Ask for confirmation from our Australian posters.

Cap
Post Reply