Sean Hughes thanks Boxrec posters

dondada · Post by **dondada** » 27 Nov 2006, 14:19

Little bit on the little man here:

http://www.britishboxing.net/

I've got a lot of time for Sean - I've seen him a few times and he certainly went out on his shield against Michael Hunter - and his fans were great too.

I say Boxrec's British forum adopt 'Short Fuse' as ours!

P.ARMAND · Post by **P.ARMAND** » 27 Nov 2006, 15:35

im a very close friend of billy corcorans, and ive been speaking to him in depth over the last few days about the fight against sean hughes on friday night. first of all he would like to congratulate sean on what was a great fight. i can ssure you that billys perfomance had nothing to do with the carl johanssen defeat, it was down to drastic weight making! since the fight it has come to light what little food and drink billy had taken on board over the last 4 weeks to make the super bantamweight limit, and i can assure you it was shocking

! you only have to look at biilys last fight against riaz durgahed to see the difference in both performances, against durgahed he was eating properly and felt strong, for the fight with sean hughes he was starving himself and went into the ring feeling very ill and very weak, he was severely dehydrated. hes not blaming anyone but himself and realises it could of proved potentially very dangerous entering the ring in that condition. make no doubt about it hes not taken nothing away from sean hughes who on the night boxed excellant but that was not the real biily corcoran in there. he will now campaign up at featherweight and would love to give sean a rematch that he thoroughly deserves.

johnswan1 · Post by **johnswan1** » 27 Nov 2006, 15:55

Would love to see a rematch of this at the York Hall in January or February.

glittermonkey · Post by **glittermonkey** » 27 Nov 2006, 17:08

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:I say Boxrec's British forum adopt 'Short Fuse' as ours!

Even though he's from Pontefract?

dondada · Post by **dondada** » 27 Nov 2006, 17:21

glittermonkey wrote:
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:I say Boxrec's British forum adopt 'Short Fuse' as ours!
Even though he's from Pontefract?

And what's wrong with Ponte?

dondada · Post by **dondada** » 27 Nov 2006, 17:22

P.ARMAND wrote:im a very close friend of billy corcorans, and ive been speaking to him in depth over the last few days about the fight against sean hughes on friday night. first of all he would like to congratulate sean on what was a great fight. i can ssure you that billys perfomance had nothing to do with the carl johanssen defeat, it was down to drastic weight making! since the fight it has come to light what little food and drink billy had taken on board over the last 4 weeks to make the super bantamweight limit, and i can assure you it was shocking ! you only have to look at biilys last fight against riaz durgahed to see the difference in both performances, against durgahed he was eating properly and felt strong, for the fight with sean hughes he was starving himself and went into the ring feeling very ill and very weak, he was severely dehydrated. hes not blaming anyone but himself and realises it could of proved potentially very dangerous entering the ring in that condition. make no doubt about it hes not taken nothing away from sean hughes who on the night boxed excellant but that was not the real biily corcoran in there. he will now campaign up at featherweight and would love to give sean a rematch that he thoroughly deserves.

Thanks for this info. Eight pounds is a lot in the little divisions, certainly.

glittermonkey · Post by **glittermonkey** » 27 Nov 2006, 17:26

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
glittermonkey wrote:
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:I say Boxrec's British forum adopt 'Short Fuse' as ours!
Even though he's from Pontefract?
And what's wrong with Ponte?

It's right next to Ferrybridge.

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 27 Nov 2006, 17:36

Nice post P.Armand.

Hope Billy is okay also. Bad performance or not, he still was part of possibly the British fight of the year.

Excluding Moore vs Macklin of course.

rhino222 · Post by **rhino222** » 27 Nov 2006, 17:52

it was obvious billy was drained before the opening bell. he was gaunt and that was 24 hours after the weigh in, potentially a very dangerous practice....

hope it does not happen again.

silkov · Post by **silkov** » 27 Nov 2006, 18:01

P.ARMAND wrote:im a very close friend of billy corcorans, and ive been speaking to him in depth over the last few days about the fight against sean hughes on friday night. first of all he would like to congratulate sean on what was a great fight. i can ssure you that billys perfomance had nothing to do with the carl johanssen defeat, it was down to drastic weight making! since the fight it has come to light what little food and drink billy had taken on board over the last 4 weeks to make the super bantamweight limit, and i can assure you it was shocking ! you only have to look at biilys last fight against riaz durgahed to see the difference in both performances, against durgahed he was eating properly and felt strong, for the fight with sean hughes he was starving himself and went into the ring feeling very ill and very weak, he was severely dehydrated. hes not blaming anyone but himself and realises it could of proved potentially very dangerous entering the ring in that condition. make no doubt about it hes not taken nothing away from sean hughes who on the night boxed excellant but that was not the real biily corcoran in there. he will now campaign up at featherweight and would love to give sean a rematch that he thoroughly deserves.

I'm not wanting to be disrespectful or anything but wasnt Billys trainers aware of the trouble he was having making the weight?... and if they werent aware of it why not?.... what was the idea of him going down to 122 in the first place?.... all in all it seems to have been a very dangerous gamble that could have gone horribly wrong...

TheRiverCityHippy · Post by **TheRiverCityHippy** » 27 Nov 2006, 19:10

i`m just happy corcoran`s allright, when he was talking to sky after the fight i thought he looked absolutely awful.
putting the contreversey aside for a moment one thing that cant be questioned is sean`s and billy`s heart, both rallied back numerous times when they looked in real trouble.

THEBUTCH · Post by **THEBUTCH** » 28 Nov 2006, 11:30

Have to agree with Silkov's sentiments re: Corcoran's weight. I'm not being wise after the event because I expressed my surprise at Billy being slated to fight at Super Bantamweight on another thread along with someone else before the Hughes bout took place.

Reading that post on Billy making weight, the whole idea seems somewhat ill-conceived.

silkov · Post by **silkov** » 28 Nov 2006, 12:26

THEBUTCH wrote:Have to agree with Silkov's sentiments re: Corcoran's weight. I'm not being wise after the event because I expressed my surprise at Billy being slated to fight at Super Bantamweight on another thread along with someone else before the Hughes bout took place.

Reading that post on Billy making weight, the whole idea seems somewhat ill-conceived.

Indeed, while not wanting to take anything away from hughes, Billy looked very frail at the weight, his body and face were emaciated...

THEBUTCH · Post by **THEBUTCH** » 29 Nov 2006, 08:47

Or it could be that Hughes put in a terrific performance, but I suspect it might be a combination of the two. I'd rather not see Billy at this weight again, but we'll see. 8 pounds is an awful lot of weight to shift at these weights.

Sean Hughes thanks Boxrec posters

Sean Hughes thanks Boxrec posters

Re: Sean Hughes thanks Boxrec posters

Re: Sean Hughes thanks Boxrec posters

Re: Sean Hughes thanks Boxrec posters