Dick Tiger

Post Reply
DoubleM
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 908
Joined: 15 Dec 2005, 09:14

Dick Tiger

Post by DoubleM »

How do you rate him?
wouter
Editor
Editor
Posts: 4800
Joined: 04 Feb 2002, 20:00

Post by wouter »

As a Nigerian fighter
DoubleM
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 908
Joined: 15 Dec 2005, 09:14

Post by DoubleM »

No, how do you rate him in general; his strengths, his weaknesses, as an overall fighter, on a middleweight list, light heavyweight list, pound-for-pound list, whatever.
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Post by KOJOE90 »

I think Dick Tiger is one of the greatest Middleweights off all time and would easily make my top 10.

He had an iron chin, good workrate, always in absolute top condition, great stamina and may well have been the physically strongest Middleweight ever. He is also an underated pubcher, he had a savage left hook to the body and head.

It was the clever 'cutie' type of fighters that gave him trouble though
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Post by KOJOE90 »

livingstone cole wrote:
wouter wrote:As a Nigerian fighter
I'd be carefull there. Have you not learnt anything from the whole Duddy debacle? He may very well be Nigerian but you should ask his relatives wether or not he prefered to be known as 'African' before you start besmirching his good name.
He may well have cosidered himself from Biafra to be honest.
DoubleM
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 908
Joined: 15 Dec 2005, 09:14

Post by DoubleM »

KOJOE90 wrote:I think Dick Tiger is one of the greatest Middleweights off all time and would easily make my top 10.

He had an iron chin, good workrate, always in absolute top condition, great stamina and may well have been the physically strongest Middleweight ever. He is also an underated pubcher, he had a savage left hook to the body and head.

It was the clever 'cutie' type of fighters that gave him trouble though
I'm in agreement with you. I don't think any middleweight could have outslugged Tiger - I think a few could come close, if forced to, but sooner or later they'd be forced on the back foot.

Tiger was a painful puncher, despite his deceivingly paltry knockout percentage. As you say, KOJOE, he had top stamina and durability. What was more surprising was his handspeed - Dick really was as quick as a Tiger! He looked like Mike Tyson in there at times with those sudden combinations to the head and body. He could slip a punch real good and counter with the right over his opponent's left, and although not usually regarded as a good boxer, he could jab with the best of them.

#6 on my head-to-head middleweight list.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4516
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Post by JC »

Be interested to see your full list.
DoubleM
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 908
Joined: 15 Dec 2005, 09:14

Post by DoubleM »

1. Carlos Monzon
2. Marvin Hagler
3. Ray Robinson
4. Bernard Hopkins
5. Marcel Cerdan
6. Dick Tiger
7. Roy Jones Jr
8. Charley Burley
9. Joey Giardello
10. Nino Benvenuti

Head-to-head, remember. I didn't like to rate Greb since I've only seen a very brief training clip of his. I have a hard time rating Giardello, Tiger, Benvenuti, Griffith, Fullmer and LaMotta really... I see them roughly equal in ability, but then there's Burley and Jones seperating them which doesn't seem right, but they were very good at 160 and I can't help it.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4516
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Post by JC »

Looks a good list, Cerdan is higher than I would have him but as you say head to head is quite subjective as at the level we're talking about a series of fights between two fighters could finish with them winning a couple a piece.

I assume you don't mention Lloyd Marshall for the same reason as Greb?
DoubleM
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 908
Joined: 15 Dec 2005, 09:14

Post by DoubleM »

J-C wrote:Looks a good list, Cerdan is higher than I would have him but as you say head to head is quite subjective as at the level we're talking about a series of fights between two fighters could finish with them winning a couple a piece.

I assume you don't mention Lloyd Marshall for the same reason as Greb?
I've actually seen Marshall on film against Ezzard Charles, but not at middleweight. You'll be pleased to know I do rate him highly. Unfortunately, Holman Williams & Eddie Booker aren't rated alongside purely for the same reasons as Greb, although I'm positive they were on the same level. I just like to see a boxer in action before I rate him.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Post by Ezzard »

DoubleM wrote:1. Carlos Monzon
2. Marvin Hagler
3. Ray Robinson
4. Bernard Hopkins
5. Marcel Cerdan
6. Dick Tiger
7. Roy Jones Jr
8. Charley Burley
9. Joey Giardello
10. Nino Benvenuti

Head-to-head, remember. I didn't like to rate Greb since I've only seen a very brief training clip of his. I have a hard time rating Giardello, Tiger, Benvenuti, Griffith, Fullmer and LaMotta really... I see them roughly equal in ability, but then there's Burley and Jones seperating them which doesn't seem right, but they were very good at 160 and I can't help it.
Surprised there's no mention of valdez on your list as i know you're a fan.

I think Tiger would have out worked Hopkins and Griffith out boxed him. I like Hopkins. He's a real great but I think he's very high on your head to head list.
DoubleM
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 908
Joined: 15 Dec 2005, 09:14

Post by DoubleM »

Valdez!! Can't believe I forgot him.

It's more like this then:

1. Carlos Monzon
2. Marvin Hagler
3. Ray Robinson
4. Bernard Hopkins
5. Marcel Cerdan
6. Dick Tiger
7. Roy Jones Jr
8. Charley Burley
9. Rodrigo Valdez
10. Joey Giardello
Post Reply