Holyfield Overated

Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Post by Collins2000 »

pundit wrote:
The Great John L wrote:
pundit wrote:You brought this up in this thread, buddy, and as far as I can see totally unmotivated [Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:57 am].
Oh really? How about this post from 12/1?
pundit wrote:At least Vitali won his WBC belt fair and square after the previous champ retired.
Not sure of the specific context of the comment, because I really don’t want to read through all of your posts. I only add to these exchanges when you make really baseless or incomprehensible claims. Unfortunately for all of us that seems to happen quite often.
pundit wrote: Looks like a severe emotional disturbance bordering a clinical condition.
I agree. You should definitely seek help, because your abilities are clearly impaired, and you seem only capable of expressing yourself through outright hostility.
And goodbye.

Don't worry folks, pumpit will soon be back to entertain us with more tall tales of his heroes the legendary belarus botty boys.

:TU:
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

Collins2000 wrote:
pundit wrote:
The Great John L wrote: Oh really? How about this post from 12/1?
Not sure of the specific context of the comment, because I really don’t want to read through all of your posts. I only add to these exchanges when you make really baseless or incomprehensible claims. Unfortunately for all of us that seems to happen quite often.
I agree. You should definitely seek help, because your abilities are clearly impaired, and you seem only capable of expressing yourself through outright hostility.
And goodbye.

Don't worry folks, pumpit will soon be back to entertain us with more tall tales of his heroes the legendary belarus botty boys.

:TU:
Seems that among other things you need to get your geography in order.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Post by The Great John L »

Collins2000 wrote:
pundit wrote:And goodbye.

Don't worry folks, pumpit will soon be back to entertain us with more tall tales of his heroes the legendary belarus botty boys.

:TU:
We better hope so. Without him, it’d get pretty damn dull around here… :TU:
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

The Great John L wrote:
Collins2000 wrote:
pundit wrote:And goodbye.

Don't worry folks, pumpit will soon be back to entertain us with more tall tales of his heroes the legendary belarus botty boys.

:TU:
We better hope so. Without him, it’d get pretty damn dull around here… :TU:
Don't worry. I have no intention of leaving -- for this it would take more than your emotional obsession with Vitali Klitschko that forces you throw his name in at every occasion.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Post by The Great John L »

pundit wrote:
The Great John L wrote:
Collins2000 wrote:
Don't worry folks, pumpit will soon be back to entertain us with more tall tales of his heroes the legendary belarus botty boys.

:TU:
We better hope so. Without him, it’d get pretty damn dull around here… :TU:
Don't worry. I have no intention of leaving -- for this it would take more than your emotional obsession with Vitali Klitschko that forces you throw his name in at every occasion.
See what I mean folks. This guy is great.
Cojimar 1945
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 482
Joined: 07 Oct 2003, 15:15

ranking

Post by Cojimar 1945 »

I think looking at wins is important in evaluating a fighter although a single win certainly should not be overemphasized. However, I personally think actual results are far more important than who people percieve to the best. Someone held in high esteem by the public may not turn out to be as good as hoped.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: ranking

Post by pundit »

Cojimar 1945 wrote:I think looking at wins is important in evaluating a fighter although a single win certainly should not be overemphasized. However, I personally think actual results are far more important than who people percieve to the best. Someone held in high esteem by the public may not turn out to be as good as hoped.
I'd rather look at performances. A superb fight with a narrow loss to a great opponent is arguably worth more than a narrow win over a third-tier fighter.
Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Re: ranking

Post by Collins2000 »

pundit wrote:
Cojimar 1945 wrote:I think looking at wins is important in evaluating a fighter although a single win certainly should not be overemphasized. However, I personally think actual results are far more important than who people percieve to the best. Someone held in high esteem by the public may not turn out to be as good as hoped.
I'd rather look at performances. A superb fight with a narrow loss to a great opponent is arguably worth more than a narrow win over a third-tier fighter.
It's a pity Dr Anal Fist never had one of those.

:TU:
Post Reply