Sweet Scientist wrote:At lightheavy, Charles destroys him...Charles is top 3 All Time @ LHW, if not #1...At heavy, the 1949 Charles wins also...over any version of Floyd...Patterson, like Marciano before him...is lucky to have fought when he did...any other era & Floyd's in Trouble...hell, he had trouble in his own era...(Johansson, Liston...later Ali)
How can you possibly be so sure? Floyd didn't fight L.H. for that long but put on the most dominant showing in the history of Olympic boxing at the 52 Olympics in the 165 lb.class. In his 13th pro fight he fought Joey Maxim who was a master boxer, I mean he beat Ray Robinson 2 years before, & wasn't far removed from the L.H. title himself. He didn't win ,but
should have. Ezzard wasn't fighting people like that in his 13th fight? Don Grant, Jimmy Slade & Yvon Durelle were dispatched easily. Moore couldn't handle his speed when Floyd was 182. How was he going to handle a 175 lb. Patterson? Floyd would have won the L.H. title. Until Marciano retired that was the goal. Who would have beat him? He would have ruled without challenge until Bob Foster's era. Foster was good but Floyd was faster & just as good a belter. Foster could hit, but he wasn't Johannson or Liston.
In fact, Floyd could have held the L.H, Cruiserweight, & Heavyweight titles all at the same time. He was that good. People criticize him for what he failed to accomplish, ie; beating Liston or Ali. It is absolutely ridiculous.
He was a great , great fighter.