Joe Calzaghe

jangeorg · Post by **jangeorg** » 31 Dec 2006, 06:04

caster wrote:
I can understand his Dad's frustrations as I think the British public don't realise just how good this guy is.

Because he is a coward

caster · Post by **caster** » 31 Dec 2006, 06:16

jangeorg wrote:
caster wrote:
I can understand his Dad's frustrations as I think the British public don't realise just how good this guy is.

Because he is a coward

.....and Kessler is a kujon!!

jangeorg · Post by **jangeorg** » 31 Dec 2006, 06:58

caster wrote:
jangeorg wrote:
caster wrote:
I can understand his Dad's frustrations as I think the British public don't realise just how good this guy is.

Because he is a coward

.....and Kessler is a kujon!!

How can he be this,Kessler offer Calzaghe $3,4 to fight him and Calzaghe refuse the offer,so who is a coward/kujon

pundit · Post by **pundit** » 31 Dec 2006, 13:26

caster wrote:In my opinion, he's the best British boxer I've seen (but I'm only 41). When I saw him as an amateur I thought he'd be something special.

You seriously rate him above Lennox Lewis???

I think he would beat Kessler and Hopkins, but I agree his record should have been populated with wins over some of the bigger names.

Well, at least Kessler is waiting to fight him.

I can understand his Dad's frustrations as I think the British public don't realise just how good this guy is.

He doesn't give them a chance to realize.

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 31 Dec 2006, 19:33

I can understand his Dad's frustrations as I think the British public don't realise just how good this guy is.

Aye, but people focus more on the opposition he fights than his talent.

Sometimes Opposition doesn't say how good you are in some cases, he's shown how good he is though. People thought Hatton was overated and would of been beaten when he stepped up and made Tszyu quit.

pundit · Post by **pundit** » 31 Dec 2006, 21:24

Max Molyneux wrote:
I can understand his Dad's frustrations as I think the British public don't realise just how good this guy is.
Aye, but people focus more on the opposition he fights than his talent.

Sometimes Opposition doesn't say how good you are in some cases, he's shown how good he is though.

When?

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 31 Dec 2006, 21:37

pundit · Post by **pundit** » 31 Dec 2006, 22:22

Max Molyneux wrote:

Ah, I guess you mean the Bika fight.

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 31 Dec 2006, 22:30

Bika was solid opponent and Vicious Maussa was right but no I don't mean Bika. When he kept to his skills he showed he was in leagues about Bika.

Autobarn · Post by **Autobarn** » 01 Jan 2007, 08:19

Max Molyneux wrote:Bika was solid opponent and Vicious Maussa was right but no I don't mean Bika. When he kept to his skills he showed he was in leagues about Bika.

On the contrary - I WAS WRONG.

Unless - Bika goes on to do big things.

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 01 Jan 2007, 11:34

So know your going against what you said? He was strong in the fight.

states · Post by **states** » 01 Jan 2007, 13:37

Max Molyneux wrote:So know your going against what you said? He was strong in the fight.

NOW. YOU'RE

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 01 Jan 2007, 13:51

Does it matter if I made a spelling mistake?

pundit · Post by **pundit** » 01 Jan 2007, 13:59

Max Molyneux wrote:Does it matter if I made a spelling mistake?

No. The spelling mistake does not matter.

states · Post by **states** » 01 Jan 2007, 14:10

Max Molyneux wrote:Does it matter if I made a spelling mistake?

Not really Max. I'm just pissed. But poor spelling and grammar really get my goat, as it were. In vino veritas and all that.