Sugar Ray Robinson vs. Thomas Hearns at WW
Sugar Ray Robinson vs. Thomas Hearns at WW
Hearns Was 1 Of The best 147 Punchers ever seen in the WW Division He was nearly impossible to outbox Other Great fighters tried to outbox The Hitman but failed Benitez, Leonard Now Robinson fought some guys with Power To spare themselves like Rocky Graziano Randy Turpin, Artie Levine But they couldn't match the Hitmas Combination of Speed Power Height skills and Reach To beat Hearns You Had to of had a hell of a chin and Stamina The style to beat Hearns was a Gene Fullmer,Carmen Basilio Style so the Question Who Gets more wins in a series to 10?? Could another Sugar pull off the Late Comeback?
-
ringsider
- Heavyweight

-
dr_devious
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5348
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19
Really I think Robinson would out class Hearns, Tommys advantage over many of his opponents at 160 was his speed but Robinson was faster, more durable and a better all round boxer... if Tommy chose to box then Ray would wear him down and ko him in about 9 or 10 rounds but if Tommy tried to bomb Ray out he would be koed himself pretty quick in about 2 or 3 rounds.... Robinson was just different class at 160...
Silk the fights at WW Hearns simply lost his legs when he was Nailed good.. it took him a round or 2 To get his legs back. Question does anyone know What was the longest Reach SRR eevr faced I am aware that the tallest fighers he ever faced were Kid Gavilan 5'10 71” Randy Turpin 5'10 Gave him Trouble..
Hearns didnt have the durability to beat Robinson, he didnt have it at 147 and he certainly didnt have it at 160... he was a great fighter but Robinson was one of the top 2 or 3 fighters of all time... thats the difference...Victor*KC wrote:Silk the fights at WW Hearns simply lost his legs when he was Nailed good.. it took him a round or 2 To get his legs back. Question does anyone know What was the longest Reach SRR eevr faced I am aware that the tallest fighers he ever faced were Kid Gavilan 5'10 71” Randy Turpin 5'10 Gave him Trouble..
-
Sweet Scientist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 815
- Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 18:19
-
Sweet Scientist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 815
- Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 18:19
...a very brief accumulation....considering he didn't make the end of the 3rd round....Victor*KC wrote:Ugh. Hearns never lost his legs from a single shot, at least not at 147. Look at all the tough shots from Hagler it took before Hearns lost his legs.
Your right it was from an accumulation
of punishment
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15672
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
This is a fight between a complete fighter in Sugar Ray vs an almost complete fighter in Tommy Hearns.
The difference here is the chin. Robinson could take a great shot from any fighter in history. Tommy? we saw what happened. In any weight class, Sugar Ray is the winner 8 of 10 times, and probably 10-0.
The difference here is the chin. Robinson could take a great shot from any fighter in history. Tommy? we saw what happened. In any weight class, Sugar Ray is the winner 8 of 10 times, and probably 10-0.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9008
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Tommy would not have had the stamina to last the course against SRR.
He could not have KO'd SRR, so he probably would have been tired in the 2nd half of the fight, trying to KO the sugarman.
Tommy had excellent boxing skills, but so did Sugar Ray.
Tommy was too easily drawn into a brawl & that would have been his downfall.
SRR KO10 Hearns.
He could not have KO'd SRR, so he probably would have been tired in the 2nd half of the fight, trying to KO the sugarman.
Tommy had excellent boxing skills, but so did Sugar Ray.
Tommy was too easily drawn into a brawl & that would have been his downfall.
SRR KO10 Hearns.