Hare Ko 2 Bergman

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 06 Sep 2003, 18:52

Any thoughts.

Hare continued his roll, and while Bergman's chin has gone - I think a 2nd round KO is still a testamony to his improving power. I would have like to have seen Bergman test Hare a bit more. But can't fault the display.

Now lets see Hare vs Khaliq.

Not been a good week for me and predictions. Norton to beat Hobson, Larsen to beat Ottke, and I did say I had a suspision that an upset might happen here (although that was a mere 2nd thought). For most part I thought Hare would win easy, but I DID get some pre fight worries (and I said them out loud).

If you want to win money then I think you should put your House on Moseley.

Cause my prediction is DLH KO 10 or a close UD/MD.

tea · Post by **tea** » 07 Sep 2003, 05:40

Stu. Don't open a bookies!

Chris Aston......Trainer Hobson/Hare/Robinson.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 07 Sep 2003, 07:50

Chris

Have you noticed that Hare is now ranked 4th by the IBF and that positions 1 and 2 are not filled by any boxer in their ratings? The Dane Thomas Damgaard is rated at no.3.

Now, what with Mayorga going in with Cory Spinks before the end of the year, there is a real chance that the IBF title will be up for grabs. Mayorga should be too strong for Spinks and then he'll head up to light-middleweight and probably vacate the title.

Things could really open up for James Hare. Last night saw a very clinical performance by James who refused to let Bergman back into the fight like Khaliq did. The ease of James's win didn't suprise me. Bergman was totally shot to bits. He proved this against Khaliq.

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 07 Sep 2003, 10:16

Chris,

Well done on a excellent weekend.

I have posed the questions of James Hare to Corey Spinks manager (on another site). He's done his research on Khaliq, but I don't know if he's seen your guy before.

I look forward to seeing Hare in action again, the guys a real talent, I don't say that about alot of the British boxers.

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 07 Sep 2003, 10:44

Anyone got the rest of the results from Huddersfield and Aberdeen last night.

Kev

tea · Post by **tea** » 07 Sep 2003, 14:56

HARE TKO 2 BERGMAN

COOK TKO 3 HOWARD

RHODES DREW DIXON

PAGE PTS 6 PHILLIPS

ANDERSON PTS 6 STARKOV

MORRISON TKO 2 MAHONEY

WALLACE PTS 4 ????

MCIVER PTS 4 SENIOR

tea · Post by **tea** » 07 Sep 2003, 14:59

STUJONES

WAT SITE DID U POSE THE QUESTION ON?

tea · Post by **tea** » 07 Sep 2003, 15:01

JAMES HARE IS

NO #8 IN THE WBA
23 IN THE WBC
4 IN THE IBF

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 07 Sep 2003, 15:02

Thanks Chris

Kevin

tea · Post by **tea** » 07 Sep 2003, 15:08

IT WON'T CHRIS IT WAS TEA(HIS SON).

ALSO WAT DO U THINK THE OUT COME WOULD BE BETWEEN COREY SPINKS VS JAMES HARE?

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 07 Sep 2003, 15:10

Thanks Son of Chris.

I think Hare would win with a late stoppage

Kev

tea · Post by **tea** » 07 Sep 2003, 15:19

WAT ABOUT HARE VS MARGARITO
HARE VS DAMGARD
HARE VS FORREST

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 07 Sep 2003, 15:29

I think he might well beat Damgaard, but the other two are a bit out of his league at the moment

Kev

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 07 Sep 2003, 15:32

Tea the 3 guys you mentioned are very good.

I think Hare would just be too smart for Damguard and win a UD.

Margarito is an interesting character, I was impressed with him against Diaz, but dissapointed with him against a chinless Lewis, he was getting tagged quite often prior to catching 6 heads. Perhaps the recent form of Diaz shows that Magarito is limited. Give Hare about 2 years and I think he'll probably win, at this moment it is 60:40 Margarito.

Forrest, sorry I think it would probably be a unaminous decision loss, the guys size would just be too much. He's still a special boxer who might be unlucky not to call himself champion at this moment (the rematch was very close).

tea · Post by **tea** » 07 Sep 2003, 16:11

THANKS FOR UR HONEST OPINION