TAK V JENNINGS
Jennings has fitness, stamina and speed in abundance, and I don't think he's got a glass jaw.
I think his chin is iffy and this, coupled with his ability to getting caught with silly punches (i.e. when he moves back in a straight line) makes him fairly vulnerable against somebody who'll probably be physically stronger.
I believe Jennings has been able to tee off with fast combinations of punches because he's mostly fought physically weaker opponents.
I believe a points loss to Daniel Santos and a KO of Anthony Farnell beats a points loss to Young Muttley and a points win over Bradley Pryce.
Look forward to a good sporting contest!
I think his chin is iffy and this, coupled with his ability to getting caught with silly punches (i.e. when he moves back in a straight line) makes him fairly vulnerable against somebody who'll probably be physically stronger.
I believe Jennings has been able to tee off with fast combinations of punches because he's mostly fought physically weaker opponents.
I believe a points loss to Daniel Santos and a KO of Anthony Farnell beats a points loss to Young Muttley and a points win over Bradley Pryce.
Look forward to a good sporting contest!
jennings lost was contrversial and takaloo got beat widely by santos even though i agree santos is a world operator.since bein beat by jennings,pryce has beat ossie duran and facey who are good fighters.so i wud say jennings win against pryce is better than takaloos against farnell who never beaten anyone half decent though he did have a big heart
i havent got a clue caster.but the last time they sparred would have been 2001 just before the takaloo fight because farnell left brian hughes camp after that.jennings was a nice boxer then but has improved alot since then and is vastly stronger whereas i think takaloo isnt the force he once was.but all questions will be answered come fight night
-
DIRT SUGAR
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1200
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 11:48
-
black panther
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4097
- Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06
I've gone for jennings - I am a bit biased since he trained at my old amateur club(but he'd turned pro before I started there) but also you have to remember jennings could well be undefeated - I thought he nicked the Mutley fight. I've been a fan of Tak over the years - his ko's over farnell,dixon,logan and that irish pink panther fella who name alludes me(waIt..JIM ROCK!) were all very entertaining BUT he has a tendency to load up on his shots making him a bit predictable. Also, sometimes his workrate lets him down - whilst jennings never stops throwing punches and I'd say is the more fleet of foot and the better boxer. Tak's always got the power but jennings on points for me.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

-
DG.
- Heavyweight

a KO loss to a perfect Wayne Alexander shot and the early KO loss when he got knackered..... I say he has a very good chin.... More than enough to absorb Jennings best unless the weight making was a little too muchDG. wrote:Jennings will win this with a wide UD.
Reasons?
1) Tak is not a good boxer.
2) Jennings IS.
Also - if Tak has such a great chin - how come he has been knocked down and stopped more than once?
-
Twinkle Toes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3340
- Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38