RICKY HATTON v TERRY MARSH @ LIGHT-WELTER

overhand_right · Post by **overhand_right** » 11 Apr 2007, 08:39

Who comes out on top?

Both men with a combined record of 69-0.

Who tastes defeat?

And who does allegedly root for?

STRATHMAN · Post by **STRATHMAN** » 11 Apr 2007, 15:51

Did Marsh not draw with Lloyd Christie?

THEBUTCH · Post by **THEBUTCH** » 12 Apr 2007, 10:11

Hatton. No way could Marsh live with Ricky for too long.

harrygreb · Post by **harrygreb** » 12 Apr 2007, 19:47

hatton busts marsh up by midway, not even close this one - nice idea though - i like the little allegedly remark at the end, who do you think, ho hum

bennie · Post by **bennie** » 13 Apr 2007, 04:53

A battle of iron wills. Marsh refused to lose. He outwilled Clinton McKenize in one of the greatest British title fights ever, made an Italian quit in Italy for the European title, walked through classy Joe Manley (a big pre-fight favourite) to win the IBF title...
Let's not forget how tough Marsh was. How good he was.

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 13 Apr 2007, 05:01

Shame we never really saw the best of marsh with his career being truncated.

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 13 Apr 2007, 06:20

I would say Hatton on points clearly, but I think it would be a fight in which there would be a lot of booing by the crowd. I could see something similar to Hatton vs Urango.

There is no way not even Ricky could dent Marsh to the body. Unfortunately, for Terry - I don't think he would offer enough offensively to provide a particularly competitive match.

THEBUTCH · Post by **THEBUTCH** » 13 Apr 2007, 08:35

Marsh never mixed it with a puncher of Hatton's standard, but it would surely have been a domestic classic.