Sprott Doesn’t Have The Balls (anymore) To Beat Williams.

Post Reply
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13262
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Sprott Doesn’t Have The Balls (anymore) To Beat Williams.

Post by MightyWarrior »

This weekend revealed his fatal weakness: Michael just doesn’t hold a shot to the gonads very well
He has glass balls. Or a china chopper, if you prefer.

I’m afraid other top fighters will have noticed this flaw, so his handlers will have to start work on strengthening his resistance – maybe lifting weights or something. Or carry his left much lower.

He should definitely be kept away from the come backing Andrew Golota.
It’s well known that the famous Pole’s favoured combination is a left, right, uppercut to the b*llocks.
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Post by bennie »

By the way, MW, I dug out the old Boxing News report of that Arguello-Ganigan war in 1982, and my memory had not played tricks about Graham Houston's blind spot to body shots. Get this! Houston doesn't even mention the body punch that ended the fight! No mention of it whatsoever. He says to introduce the report: "In a sensationally exciting fight, Arguello was dropped by a slamming left hook in the first and badly hurt in the third before he found the punches to flatten Ganigan in the fifth."
Then he goes into a brief round by round account of the brawl, and writes after the third round scare the champion suffered: "But Arguello, like the great champion he is, boxed his way back into the fight and in the fifth a left and a right to the head smashed into Ganigan and he dropped for the full count.
"It was a tremendous kayo with Ganigan out for some minutes before he left the ring."
I will double check his oversight by looking at the Fights of the Year he compiled for Boxing News later in 1982. Arguello-Ganigan was definitely one of the fights of the year and it will be interesting to see what he says about the end there.
Post Reply