Hennessy keen to continue Froch-Calzaghe negotiations

Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Post by Chambers2 »

As I've been saying allegedly is a cant, why is he refusing to state whether he wants options on Carl????

Its another typical FWank manouver (sp) to avoid a fight without saying he's avoiding a fight, just like Haye Vs Enzo was. Warrens lost his bottle!!

(Carl sparks Joe by the way)
Last edited by Chambers2 on 18 Apr 2007, 04:35, edited 1 time in total.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

Lenny wrote:There is no way this happens without options on Froch which is why this is a non starter.

I think we all know Calzaghe won't fight in July so why not fight Kessler in September? If Calzaghe ends up fighting September or later and the opponent is anyone but Kessler people need to seriously start washing their hands of him.
I can believe that. With a Joe vs Taylor fight maybe in the future they'll be keen to protect what they have.

Why not just have a fecking rematch clause then? God knows why 1 paper quotes Frank as saying he offered Froch his biggest purse with no options.

But this is boxing and the alternative - Bika, Ashira - meely fvcks his hands up! Doing more harm than good.


I agree. Frank is making boxing fans looks like dicknoses. As Dooley says in his recent column - you talk about boxing and ppl frown at you. When I talk to more knowledgable non boxing ppl, I usually get hit with 3 words "Frank" "Warren" and "Shite."
Post Reply