Guess Hayes weight (has the weigh in happened yet???)

Post Reply
knockout
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3868
Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 10:00

Guess Hayes weight (has the weigh in happened yet???)

Post by knockout »

what do you guys think Haye will weigh in at??

16st 8???
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

219. :box:
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Post by Lenny »

215
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Guess Hayes weight (has the weigh in happened yet???)

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

knockout wrote:what do you guys think Haye will weigh in at??

16st 8???
Haye said he is aiming for 15 stone 8....
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Post by Neri »

217 :box:
E
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by E »

15 st 4lb
Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1718
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Post by Shirow »

And the winner is....



Neri


I've just come back from the weigh in. Haye 217, Bonin 231
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

That's 15 Stone 7. That sounds about perfect. I'm glad to hear Haye's come in that light, he was aiming for about another stone in weight originally, but at 235 I think he'd have been far too bulky.

He's only about 15 over his normal fighting weight, which I think should suit him just fine.
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Post by Neri »

Shirow wrote:And the winner is....



Neri


I've just come back from the weigh in. Haye 217, Bonin 231
What do I win? :lol:

Nice weight to come in at. Looking forward to seeing this heavyweight David Haye although part of me just wants ot out of the way as I'm dying to see Haye-Mormeck.
Rocky Balboa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1851
Joined: 24 Jan 2004, 16:38

Post by Rocky Balboa »

http://www.britishboxing.net/news_2281- ... tough.html


Haye claims he's only has about 7% body fat weighing 217lbs. I think that's an exaggeration some-what. If his body fat % is anywhere near as low that, then there's no way he'll make 200lbs again.

Haye is muscular, but damn, 7%?
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

Shirow wrote:And the winner is....



Neri


I've just come back from the weigh in. Haye 217, Bonin 231
That's exactly what I would have guessed :TU:
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

Defeat for Haye is unthinkable at the moment....but it'll be interesting to see what happens if a heavyweight manages to connect with a half decent punch - Mock was around 168 when he put David over.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

One thing that worries me about Haye, is that he seems to have a rather long slender neck to campaign at heavyweight. If you look at most natural heavyweights, they have short thick necks, and are barrel chested. Haye is muscular and broad shouldered, but the overall impression if of a fit, atheltic, but generally slender man. Slender is relative of course, but I am comparing him to successful natural heavyweights of recent times.

When he was hit by mock, it was right on top of the head as I recall, or rather just above the temple, which obviously is going to compress the neck more.

None of this will be relevant if Haye is able to stay out of harms way, or is able to bomb Bonin out early (which would be a surprise), but like you, I do wonder how he's going to react if he gets a big clump on the chin from Bonin.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Post by Wales »

Its not reccomended you go below 7% body fat is it, not that I'd be able to grace that type of percentage, I'd be lucky to dip below 17%.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:One thing that worries me about Haye, is that he seems to have a rather long slender neck to campaign at heavyweight. If you look at most natural heavyweights, they have short thick necks, and are barrel chested. Haye is muscular and broad shouldered, but the overall impression if of a fit, atheltic, but generally slender man. Slender is relative of course, but I am comparing him to successful natural heavyweights of recent times.

When he was hit by mock, it was right on top of the head as I recall, or rather just above the temple, which obviously is going to compress the neck more.

None of this will be relevant if Haye is able to stay out of harms way, or is able to bomb Bonin out early (which would be a surprise), but like you, I do wonder how he's going to react if he gets a big clump on the chin from Bonin.
Yeah it's true those temple shots can sometimes have a weird effect on anyone, though the chin rumours were always there, even before the Mock fight.

I wouldn't be surprised if he blasted out Bonin early - he should test that chin early if possible, because he doesn't want to be hanging around too long with a heavyweight.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

I think Haye will probably try to drill Bonin early on with some big right hands, to at the very least keep him in negative mode. It's a tricky one though, throwing big shots always leaves the risk of being countered, though Haye is surely going to be a lot faster than the big man?
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Post by Old bones Ian »

I think your right in thinking Haye will go out throwing those big right hands, In Bonins last fight he was decked by a guy having his 1st pro fight, so haye will fancy knocking him over early.
Only thing is Bonin may not cave in , and if he's still there after 6 rounds then Haye may find himself in trouble.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

Haye should win this, probably on points but I just cant see him beating the top heavies, I dont think he has the chin or the stamina to do so... someone like Samuel Peter or the Klitchenko brothers would flatten him imo...
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27497
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

Wales wrote:Its not reccomended you go below 7% body fat is it, not that I'd be able to grace that type of percentage, I'd be lucky to dip below 17%.
Thats true, my mate had a 4% body fat and was really recommended for him to put on some weight. He eat fine, but trained like a mad man.

He's up to about 8% now.

I don't think Haye is 7% he's a little higher than that. Although depends on the machine used.... some are less accurate than others.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

I agree Haye will come out blazing and try to rip through Bonin similarly in the way he did with the likes of Glenn Kelly and Arthur Williams. Question is how will he react if Bonin stays upright?

Bonin has had some awful opposition and that recent video doing the rounds showed he can be pretty inept at times as well as capable. This is a smart move for Haye as Bonin's record majorly flatters him. Any enough rambling i hope David Haye does the business and KO's Bonin tomorrow night.

Haye TKO 5 Bonin for old 689 :TU:
overhand_right
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by overhand_right »

Haye will blow this chump out early. Audley took 9 and a ref-assisted win, but as we know Audley is totally inept and clueless.
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Post by josh fg »

My thinking is that Haye will try to impose himself in the first couple of rounds his jab is becoming more of a force to be recond with so he will proberbly try to back him up with that befor unloading big shots. After that if bonin is still there he will use bonin fighting on the back foot to get a breather and build up a points advantage then try some bombs again about 8-10 Haye KO 10 (unless its a 12 round fight in which case Im less sure).
Post Reply