Hahaha, aren't we stupid, we fell for Warren again

Post Reply
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Hahaha, aren't we stupid, we fell for Warren again

Post by pundit »

He pretended to negotiate with Palle, will trying at all cost to get Taylor and avoid Kessler.

And some of us (including myself) started believing Warren might indeed try to make the one and only JC career-defining ultimate super-middleweight unification bout... How ridiculous! :lol: :lol: :lol:
JAHamilton77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 613
Joined: 06 Mar 2006, 13:14

Post by JAHamilton77 »

not content with needling the Brits in the neutral territory of Other Sports etc, pundit persues them back to their home territory.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

anyway, the campaign to fight taylor begins. only problem being taylor wants lots of money, doesn't want to fight over here blah blah which means it'll go on forever...

maybe that isn't so bad because i have an increasing desire to see taylor versus pavlik.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Hahaha, aren't we stupid, we fell for Warren again

Post by Chambers2 »

pundit wrote:He pretended to negotiate with Palle, will trying at all cost to get Taylor and avoid Kessler.

And some of us (including myself) started believing Warren might indeed try to make the one and only JC career-defining ultimate super-middleweight unification bout... How ridiculous! :lol: :lol: :lol:
To be honest I'd much prefer to see JC fight Kessler, but any fight where Joe isn't a 1/50 fave will do after the recent run of diatribe
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Hahaha, aren't we stupid, we fell for Warren again

Post by J »

pundit wrote:He pretended to negotiate with Palle, will trying at all cost to get Taylor and avoid Kessler.

And some of us (including myself) started believing Warren might indeed try to make the one and only JC career-defining ultimate super-middleweight unification bout... How ridiculous! :lol: :lol: :lol:
I DUNNO WHO IS MORE BORING YOU OR FW.


seriously pundit are you interested in boxing or this personal crusade to get overyone knocking one out of Kessler. :roll:
armageto
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5260
Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15

Post by armageto »

Final Fight wrote:anyway, the campaign to fight taylor begins. only problem being taylor wants lots of money, doesn't want to fight over here blah blah which means it'll go on forever...

maybe that isn't so bad because i have an increasing desire to see taylor versus pavlik.
Taylor doesn't need Calzaghe for a big money fight. He is also the #1 fighter at 160 in most eyes. He doesn't have to go to the UK and for less money that he could make here? It doesn't make much sense.....

Calzaghe will face Inkin, mark my words....... :roll:
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

armageto wrote:
Final Fight wrote:anyway, the campaign to fight taylor begins. only problem being taylor wants lots of money, doesn't want to fight over here blah blah which means it'll go on forever...

maybe that isn't so bad because i have an increasing desire to see taylor versus pavlik.
Taylor doesn't need Calzaghe for a big money fight. He is also the #1 fighter at 160 in most eyes. He doesn't have to go to the UK and for less money that he could make here? It doesn't make much sense.....

Calzaghe will face Inkin, mark my words....... :roll:
JT v Pav, J Cal v Inkin - I have no complaint against that.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

Final Fight wrote:
armageto wrote:
Final Fight wrote:anyway, the campaign to fight taylor begins. only problem being taylor wants lots of money, doesn't want to fight over here blah blah which means it'll go on forever...

maybe that isn't so bad because i have an increasing desire to see taylor versus pavlik.
Taylor doesn't need Calzaghe for a big money fight. He is also the #1 fighter at 160 in most eyes. He doesn't have to go to the UK and for less money that he could make here? It doesn't make much sense.....

Calzaghe will face Inkin, mark my words....... :roll:
JT v Pav, J Cal v Inkin - I have no complaint against that.
Dunno. Inkin is an OK fight, but Calzaghe is 35 and has little time left to make BIG fights.
ArtOfWar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1253
Joined: 24 Oct 2003, 11:54

Post by ArtOfWar »

Calzaghe v Taylor or Kessler would be good, but I have no faith in either fight being made. It seems that a lot of people think Calzaghe would blow through Taylor and that Kessler is the real test, but I think Taylor is just as big a challenge as the Dane.

To be honest though Calzaghe's career has been such a shambles that it doesn't matter who he fights now. It's just been a complete f**king joke when you think about who he could have fought.
Post Reply