Hmm Steve Collins says he beat on Bomber Graham.?
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Eubank was nowhere near over the hill when he fought Collins..he had been getting joke decisions for a while..considering that in a previous thread people were going on about how great JC was against Eubank and how JC was lauding how good Eubank was I think we should come to the conclusion that there was no depreciation in Eubanks talent pre Collins...
I will give you Benn, Benn wasnt the same once he for McClellan..thats not revisionism, we knew that at the time...
I will give you Benn, Benn wasnt the same once he for McClellan..thats not revisionism, we knew that at the time...
thepocketrocket wrote:Eubank was nowhere near over the hill when he fought Collins..he had been getting joke decisions for a while..considering that in a previous thread people were going on about how great JC was against Eubank and how JC was lauding how good Eubank was I think we should come to the conclusion that there was no depreciation in Eubanks talent pre Collins...
I will give you Benn, Benn wasnt the same once he for McClellan..thats not revisionism, we knew that at the time...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!... good job you're not biased!...
and yes Graham did lose to Kalambay as well (as did Mccallum) but Kalambay didnt make Graham look silly like he did Collins... and he was much older when he fought Collins!!... 8)
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
-
Arbachakov
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 380
- Joined: 15 Apr 2006, 12:35
Kalambay and Graham were BOTH past it in their second fight.
It was a helluva fight largely because they had both lost their reflexes.
Graham would go on to lose to Frank Grant in his very next fight.
Kalambay managed to pull out a good performance against Collins from nowhere, but in his next meaningful fight his age caught up with him and he lost a close decision to ordinary Pyatt and looked just as washed up as he had in the fights previous to Collins.
It was a helluva fight largely because they had both lost their reflexes.
Graham would go on to lose to Frank Grant in his very next fight.
Kalambay managed to pull out a good performance against Collins from nowhere, but in his next meaningful fight his age caught up with him and he lost a close decision to ordinary Pyatt and looked just as washed up as he had in the fights previous to Collins.
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Just see the backlash this thread caused..it did seem a case of 'how dare that punk Collins talk shit about Graham'Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:I think it's a load of absolute shite. And ignorant I ain't.thepocketrocket wrote:to denigrate Collins' claims that he beat him up in sparring is ignorant.
Collins is a great little fighter who the British Public just cant accept and love to run him down
I have huge respect for Collins. Huge. But to say he beat Graham up in sparring goes contrary to everything I've ever heard about either of them in the gym. And I've heard plenty - about Bomber at least.thepocketrocket wrote:Just see the backlash this thread caused..it did seem a case of 'how dare that punk Collins talk shit about Graham'Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:I think it's a load of absolute shite. And ignorant I ain't.thepocketrocket wrote:to denigrate Collins' claims that he beat him up in sparring is ignorant.
Collins is a great little fighter who the British Public just cant accept and love to run him down
Ergo...I believe it's a crock of shit. Nothing to do with my lack of respect for Collins at all.
DeWitt would have beat the living shit out of Collins.thepocketrocket wrote:
What do you all think Collins would have done to Doug De Witt? Dont answer in fact, its too obvious...
Watch the Thornton fights, Thornton is robbed blind against Collins, has him running for his life and cut to bits (his ear was hanging off!), while DeWitt is commanding the centre of the ring, breaking Tony's hand with his face and outworking him with left hand work (doubling and tripling his jabs and hooks). DeWitt looks superior, he made a peak Tommy Hearns work and none of the rounds were blow-outs - what do you think Tommy would have done to Collins?
Eubank was never the same after Watson, in fact after the WARS he had with Benn and Watson, he was much less effective, a battle scarred, more hesitant fighter, who of course was still a very tough boxer, with a lot of heart. But a prime Eubank destroys Collins. And of course, same goes for Benn!thepocketrocket wrote:Eubank was nowhere near over the hill when he fought Collins..he had been getting joke decisions for a while..considering that in a previous thread people were going on about how great JC was against Eubank and how JC was lauding how good Eubank was I think we should come to the conclusion that there was no depreciation in Eubanks talent pre Collins...
I will give you Benn, Benn wasnt the same once he for McClellan..thats not revisionism, we knew that at the time...
too right! those were the days. warriors.STP wrote:The Benn and Eubank II performances of Watson's were absolutely top drawer, leagues above anything I've seen from Collins - leages and leagues!thepocketrocket wrote: Collins performances against Johnson and Mccallum are far better than anything that Watson did!
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Its such a cliche...fist wrote:too right! those were the days. warriors.STP wrote:The Benn and Eubank II performances of Watson's were absolutely top drawer, leagues above anything I've seen from Collins - leages and leagues!thepocketrocket wrote: Collins performances against Johnson and Mccallum are far better than anything that Watson did!
Eubank 'wasnt the same after Watson'...Eubank looked poor beforhand, nothing changed..Chris had one problem...HE COULDNT SUSTAIN A WORKRATE!
Watson did well against Benn, but it was a novicey Benn who hadnt even gone to America to really learn his trade, lets not pretend this was the same animal who beat McClellan or even (to Chris' credit) got beaten by Eubank..
Collins UD12 against all, maybe knocking Nigel out around the 11th in a thriller
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
OK, I have seen neither fight so wont argue too much but both fights were apparently majority decisions, apparently De witt didnt dominate Thornton..STP wrote:DeWitt would have beat the living shit out of Collins.thepocketrocket wrote:
What do you all think Collins would have done to Doug De Witt? Dont answer in fact, its too obvious...
Watch the Thornton fights, Thornton is robbed blind against Collins, has him running for his life and cut to bits (his ear was hanging off!), while DeWitt is commanding the centre of the ring, breaking Tony's hand with his face and outworking him with left hand work (doubling and tripling his jabs and hooks). DeWitt looks superior, he made a peak Tommy Hearns work and none of the rounds were blow-outs - what do you think Tommy would have done to Collins?
Saying that, what does it matter? De will fought Benn Three years after he fought Thornton and even reports at the time implied De Witt was coming to the end of a hard career...
The De Witt of 1990 would have been outboxed easily by Collins..would he have outboxed a peak Dewitt?? No idea, but hey, that wasnt the question
I felt there would have been no Collins legend had Eubank not simply finished him. Which he should have easily were it not for his demons.Terry D wrote:McCallum played with Collins and got tired, due to his excellent early work, then seemed to say: 'Here you go, have a round or two on me.'
Eubank hurt Collins really badly and perhaps with a little more devil or polish would have taken him out or put him over again.
Collins seems a good guy at functions but he was merely a decent fighter who timed his opportunities well against a deeply-flawed Eubank (it was still close) and an aged Benn. I actually thought his best wins came over Neville Brown and Chris Pyatt, I enjoyed those fights. Then he spent the rest of his reign calling out Leonard and a few retired fighters.
As for sparring stories, of course he tells fibs, he is Irish, they don't go out drinking, they go out embellishing with the odd (as in number 47) pint thrown in.
Pyatt may have been the best win and yet that was a close fight that was prematurely stopped. Pyatt was defending himself well on the ropes, with head movement after being hurt before the ref jumped in.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45232
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
I disagree, Eubank had lost his killer instinct. I remember him standing of Thompson after giving him a pounding on the ropes. Eubank was always a monster when he had opponents hurt before Watson.thepocketrocket wrote:Its such a cliche...fist wrote:too right! those were the days. warriors.STP wrote: The Benn and Eubank II performances of Watson's were absolutely top drawer, leagues above anything I've seen from Collins - leages and leagues!
Eubank 'wasnt the same after Watson'...Eubank looked poor beforhand, nothing changed..Chris had one problem...HE COULDNT SUSTAIN A WORKRATE!
Watson did well against Benn, but it was a novicey Benn who hadnt even gone to America to really learn his trade, lets not pretend this was the same animal who beat McClellan or even (to Chris' credit) got beaten by Eubank..
Collins UD12 against all, maybe knocking Nigel out around the 11th in a thriller
I think Watson would have beaten the Benn who beat McClellan, Benn may have learned a few tricks, but he was still absolutely wide open and eat a tonne of shots off of McClellan, who defensively was very poor. Watson had a much better defence and boxing ability, or at least used it better than McClellan. Watson was also a bigger man than Gerald, who didn't look suited to 168.
Eubank and Benn were both near the end when they fought Collins, Benn's balance was clearly gone in both fights, and Eubank was struggling with making weight and I think also mentally weakened by the Watson fight.
. I actually thought his best wins came over Neville Brown and Chris Pyatt, I enjoyed those fights. Then he spent the rest of his reign calling out Leonard and a few retired fighters.
As for sparring stories, of course he tells fibs, he is Irish, they don't go out drinking, they go out embellishing with the odd (as in number 47) pint thrown in.[/quote]
There you have it with Collins. He beat a shot Benn. Beat Brown who was a Middle moving up. Collins dwarfed him in that fight. Pyatt started at light middle if I'm correct.
As for sparring stories, of course he tells fibs, he is Irish, they don't go out drinking, they go out embellishing with the odd (as in number 47) pint thrown in.[/quote]
There you have it with Collins. He beat a shot Benn. Beat Brown who was a Middle moving up. Collins dwarfed him in that fight. Pyatt started at light middle if I'm correct.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45232
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
dr_devious
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5349
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19
DeWitt was in the best form of his career against Robbie Sims and Matthew Hilton. He'd have been a big favourite to beat Collins, ofcourse.thepocketrocket wrote:OK, I have seen neither fight so wont argue too much but both fights were apparently majority decisions, apparently De witt didnt dominate Thornton..STP wrote:DeWitt would have beat the living shit out of Collins.thepocketrocket wrote:
What do you all think Collins would have done to Doug De Witt? Dont answer in fact, its too obvious...
Watch the Thornton fights, Thornton is robbed blind against Collins, has him running for his life and cut to bits (his ear was hanging off!), while DeWitt is commanding the centre of the ring, breaking Tony's hand with his face and outworking him with left hand work (doubling and tripling his jabs and hooks). DeWitt looks superior, he made a peak Tommy Hearns work and none of the rounds were blow-outs - what do you think Tommy would have done to Collins?
Saying that, what does it matter? De will fought Benn Three years after he fought Thornton and even reports at the time implied De Witt was coming to the end of a hard career...
The De Witt of 1990 would have been outboxed easily by Collins..would he have outboxed a peak Dewitt?? No idea, but hey, that wasnt the question
Youre an idiot if you think that Graham was anywhere close to his peak when he fought Kalambay the second time... you obviously havent got a clue and as for Collins I actually liked him a lot when he was fighting but since retiring (rather than fight Joe Calzaghe!!) he's become a bit of a joke with his boasting, boozing and wife beating!... but if you still love the man good on you!, ....birds of a feather I guess eh!!thepocketrocket wrote:Just see the backlash this thread caused..it did seem a case of 'how dare that punk Collins talk shit about Graham'Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:I think it's a load of absolute shite. And ignorant I ain't.thepocketrocket wrote:to denigrate Collins' claims that he beat him up in sparring is ignorant.
Collins is a great little fighter who the British Public just cant accept and love to run him down
-
Arnie
- Heavyweight
