Calzaghe v Kessler in Denmark

Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Autobarn wrote:
Katon! wrote:Well when Ottke retired, Calzaghe had more championship experiance when all the new guys were becoming belt holders so he was more of a champ than them on experiance.

Plus most super middleweights kept winning a title like the WBC and then they constantly changed hands while Joe still has his title.
Therefore the regular and super collapsed into one.
It collapsed but Mundine didn't make his WBA reign exactly credible though.
thing is, when Kessler was beating Siaca, Mundine & Lucas, who was Joe fighting? Salem, Veit (rematch) & Ashira. These were well below par for any title holder.

Mundine's title reigns aren't credible because they are for a nonsense belt. But I still think he outboxed Siaca enough to win a decision. He's a fine boxer who's now added some spite to his slickness and I'd take him over Jermain Taylor any day of the week.
Not just a nonsense belt Mundine never fought credible challengers other than Siaca for that belt.

Even now he's chosen a guy not rated In WBA.

I don't dispute Calzaghe's opp at the time though, It was worse, Veit was Inkin's step up though so he might be an underrated win for Calzaghe still though.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

Katon! wrote:
Autobarn wrote:
Katon! wrote:Well when Ottke retired, Calzaghe had more championship experiance when all the new guys were becoming belt holders so he was more of a champ than them on experiance.

Plus most super middleweights kept winning a title like the WBC and then they constantly changed hands while Joe still has his title.
It collapsed but Mundine didn't make his WBA reign exactly credible though.
thing is, when Kessler was beating Siaca, Mundine & Lucas, who was Joe fighting? Salem, Veit (rematch) & Ashira. These were well below par for any title holder.

Mundine's title reigns aren't credible because they are for a nonsense belt. But I still think he outboxed Siaca enough to win a decision. He's a fine boxer who's now added some spite to his slickness and I'd take him over Jermain Taylor any day of the week.
Not just a nonsense belt Mundine never fought credible challengers other than Siaca for that belt.

Even now he's chosen a guy not rated In WBA.

I don't dispute Calzaghe's opp at the time though, It was worse, Veit was Inkin's step up though so he might be an underrated win for Calzaghe still though.
Mundine's a terrific boxer but he's just not - and has never been - a world champion. He could go on to win a proper one, though.

Veit has some class. But he is a wimp and throws few punches. He nearly dropped Joe with a great shot. I liked the way Inkin dealt with him. Steady, methodical, merciless. Like you say, a good step up opponent, when you rise from Euro to world class. But not the best title defense, IMO.
Post Reply