Will ITV be showing the SN cards in July?

Post Reply
jomothepure
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2660
Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 08:43

Will ITV be showing the SN cards in July?

Post by jomothepure »

Still no news about the Khan/Cook card on the 14th, and the Enzo/M'Baye card the week after, being shown on ITV, although their site continues to announce all the major news in the build up to the SN shows, like Khan has been eating porridge etc.

I had a feeling the contract ran out very soon - like possibly even before these cards are due. Does anyone know?
STP
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 937
Joined: 26 Feb 2007, 08:38

Post by STP »

Warren will definitely accept any offer he can get, IMO, because otherwise he's doomed - Hennessy will slide in on ITV and would probably overtake him as Britain's No.1 promoter soon enough (being terrestrial).

He'd lose his precious News of the World column as well that has shot him to fame.
Big Pussy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 206
Joined: 07 Mar 2007, 09:58

Re: Will ITV be showing the SN cards in July?

Post by Big Pussy »

jomothepure wrote:Still no news about the Khan/Cook card on the 14th, and the Enzo/M'Baye card the week after, being shown on ITV, although their site continues to announce all the major news in the build up to the SN shows, like Khan has been eating porridge etc.

I had a feeling the contract ran out very soon - like possibly even before these cards are due. Does anyone know?
He's renewing his deal with ITV.

Less money, less dates and non-exclusive which means ITV will show american fights.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Will ITV be showing the SN cards in July?

Post by oliverfennell »

Big Pussy wrote:
jomothepure wrote:Still no news about the Khan/Cook card on the 14th, and the Enzo/M'Baye card the week after, being shown on ITV, although their site continues to announce all the major news in the build up to the SN shows, like Khan has been eating porridge etc.

I had a feeling the contract ran out very soon - like possibly even before these cards are due. Does anyone know?
He's renewing his deal with ITV.

Less money, less dates and non-exclusive which means ITV will show american fights.
Have you got a source for this?
boxingchat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1934
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 05:26

Post by boxingchat »

GOD, ISN'T IT A RESULT THAT YOU LOT ARE NOT IN THE BUSINESS WITH YOUR UNRIVALLED KNOWLEDGE AND INSIGHTS.
jomothepure
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2660
Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 08:43

Post by jomothepure »

BC - for a change, do you want to give us some useful information rather then and/or in addition to taking sardonic digs at us "lot"?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Post by leforge »

itv wont show us fights, they make more money of quiz shows at that time of morning
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Post by oliverfennell »

boxingchat wrote:GOD, ISN'T IT A RESULT THAT YOU LOT ARE NOT IN THE BUSINESS WITH YOUR UNRIVALLED KNOWLEDGE AND INSIGHTS.
How about you bless us with your knowledge on this topic, then?
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

boxingchat wrote:GOD, ISN'T IT A RESULT THAT YOU LOT ARE NOT IN THE BUSINESS WITH YOUR UNRIVALLED KNOWLEDGE AND INSIGHTS.
Well, if we were in the business, then we would obviously have more insight and knowledge.

It doesn't make you a genius because you happen to know facts and figures others don't, it's the use that knowledge is put to that makes a genius.
Fat Gav
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39
Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 13:35

Post by Fat Gav »

I did see a piece by John Rawling in The Guardian where he said that allegedly was likely to continue working with IT ITV. And if anyone knows, it's Rawling.

http://sport.guardian.co.uk/boxing/stor ... 98,00.html
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Remember how SN got rid of Sky.
And It took them 10 years to do so.

He won't go off ITV so easy.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Post by oliverfennell »

Fat Gav wrote:I did see a piece by John Rawling in The Guardian where he said that allegedly allegedly was likely to continue working with IT ITV. And if anyone knows, it's Rawling.

http://sport.guardian.co.uk/boxing/stor ... 98,00.html
Doesn't say anything about ITV in there.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Post by m1kee50 »

boxingchat wrote:GOD, ISN'T IT A RESULT THAT YOU LOT ARE NOT IN THE BUSINESS WITH YOUR UNRIVALLED KNOWLEDGE AND INSIGHTS.
you are the one with the 'insight' (up your own arse it seems), why not contribute to the the discussion?

If you had anything to say which was positive for SN and/or FW, Im sure you would have bleated about it...

So why not tell us something that will renew our faith in your much-maligned employer? You turn up, make one disparaging post, give us no information on why we are in error... and then wonder why SN have turned into the Millwall of boxing?

You should try contributing to the discussion before insulting everyone - I didnt get that from boxing, that was at the University of Life...
Big Pussy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 206
Joined: 07 Mar 2007, 09:58

Post by Big Pussy »

boxingchat wrote:GOD, ISN'T IT A RESULT THAT YOU LOT ARE NOT IN THE BUSINESS WITH YOUR UNRIVALLED KNOWLEDGE AND INSIGHTS.
I'd rather flip burgers than do what you do.
split_decision
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 255
Joined: 26 Apr 2005, 16:11

Post by split_decision »

oliverfennell wrote:
Fat Gav wrote:I did see a piece by John Rawling in The Guardian where he said that allegedly allegedly allegedly was likely to continue working with IT ITV. And if anyone knows, it's Rawling.

http://sport.guardian.co.uk/boxing/stor ... 98,00.html
Doesn't say anything about ITV in there.
yeah it does, in this paragraph.
Although Warren has yet to sign a new British television deal - his current agreement with ITV expires at the end of this month - it is likely he will continue to work with ITV, which is committed to blanket coverage of the Rugby World Cup in September and may be reluctant to pay big money for a fight that might clash with an England's group match against South Africa or Samoa.
Scooby Doo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 95
Joined: 14 May 2007, 16:20

Post by Scooby Doo »

Rumour has it that a certain boxing promoter has accepted a deal with ITV.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

Scooby Doo wrote:Rumour has it that a certain boxing promoter has accepted a deal with ITV.
who, barry hearn or jess harding?
WildWaylon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3223
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35

Post by WildWaylon »

Big Pussy wrote:
boxingchat wrote:GOD, ISN'T IT A RESULT THAT YOU LOT ARE NOT IN THE BUSINESS WITH YOUR UNRIVALLED KNOWLEDGE AND INSIGHTS.
I'd rather flip burgers than do what you do.
What does he do apart from licking Franks arse and being his teaboy - He obviously has no status, because he, like us knows bugger all - Childish comments are much more likely to originate from pawns rather than bishops or knights.
Scooby Doo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 95
Joined: 14 May 2007, 16:20

Post by Scooby Doo »

boxingchat wrote:GOD, ISN'T IT A RESULT THAT YOU LOT ARE NOT IN THE BUSINESS WITH YOUR UNRIVALLED KNOWLEDGE AND INSIGHTS.
I heard a promoter is accepting a deal with ITV but its a very watered down one and there could be staff cuts for that promoter he has to get rid of the shit.

Thats of course if this promoter is not bubbled going to another channel playing one against the other.

I really do not know who I am on about.
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Post by Carbo »

boxingchat wrote:GOD, ISN'T IT A RESULT THAT YOU LOT ARE NOT IN THE BUSINESS WITH YOUR UNRIVALLED KNOWLEDGE AND INSIGHTS.
Isn't disappointing that one of the few posters actually involved in the industry is also one of the least instructive?
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

Scooby Doo wrote:
boxingchat wrote:GOD, ISN'T IT A RESULT THAT YOU LOT ARE NOT IN THE BUSINESS WITH YOUR UNRIVALLED KNOWLEDGE AND INSIGHTS.
I heard a promoter is accepting a deal with ITV but its a very watered down one and there could be staff cuts for that promoter he has to get rid of the shit.

Thats of course if this promoter is not bubbled going to another channel playing one against the other.

I really do not know who I am on about.
maybe he's been told, cut the shit or we'll leave you on ITV4
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Terry D wrote:
Katon! wrote:
Remember how SN got rid of Sky.
And It took them 10 years to do so.

He won't go off ITV so easy.
It was a joke Max.
Make It sound like one then. :P
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Post by dr_devious »

Hasnt Bravo got a slot after UFC Unleashed?
Post Reply