Vegas this weekend
Vegas this weekend
Heading to Vegas for the Hatton-Castillo fight this Thursday – just wondering where/when the weigh in will be held. Presumably this is open to the public?
Also anyone know when the bill starts and whether we can expect anything decent on the undercard (not Matthew Hatton)?
Also anyone know when the bill starts and whether we can expect anything decent on the undercard (not Matthew Hatton)?
the undercard is dire im afraid, and i have no anti FA bias, its just with the main event being such a 'headliner' i would have expected some world title level scraps on the undercard.
in fact id go as far as to say thats its possibly the worst vegas undercard i have ever seen. considering the pride of britain is in such a big fight, the supporting cast is headlined by his brother !!!
i know clinton withdrew and should have been on the bill, but that was at least 2 months ago, surely enough time to draft in a few quality fighters from another promoter. all in all a pile of garbage unfortunately...
in fact id go as far as to say thats its possibly the worst vegas undercard i have ever seen. considering the pride of britain is in such a big fight, the supporting cast is headlined by his brother !!!
i know clinton withdrew and should have been on the bill, but that was at least 2 months ago, surely enough time to draft in a few quality fighters from another promoter. all in all a pile of garbage unfortunately...
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
This is always a potential issue/problem when essentially the Hattons are promoting the event themselves - why would they want to eat into profit margins by putting on a competitive or extensive undercard?rhino222 wrote:the undercard is dire im afraid, and i have no anti FA bias, its just with the main event being such a 'headliner' i would have expected some world title level scraps on the undercard.
in fact id go as far as to say thats its possibly the worst vegas undercard i have ever seen. considering the pride of britain is in such a big fight, the supporting cast is headlined by his brother !!!
i know clinton withdrew and should have been on the bill, but that was at least 2 months ago, surely enough time to draft in a few quality fighters from another promoter. all in all a pile of garbage unfortunately...
I can see the reasoning from their point of view but as a paying customer I wouldn't be happy travelling to Vegas to see 'Magic' Matthew headlining the undercard!
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
is it Hatton v Israel Cardona? , thats the reports i've read.
http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=6435
http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=6435
we are first tier 3 row of the riased seating raised parallell to the ring so no fornicating camera men in the way. 600 USD per ticket. No point going all that way to be up in the gods hey.Old bones Ian wrote:lucky bugger, have you got a ringside seat?J wrote:be careful as well the main event starts 7 pm.
MAY SEE YA THERE
and don't lose to much on the tables
Cardona pulled out as did his replacement Louis Brown.Old bones Ian wrote:is it Hatton v Israel Cardona? , thats the reports i've read.
http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=6435
Last i heard he's fighting Ruben Galvan.
-
boxingchat
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1934
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 05:26
That is what happens when the fighter commands all the money!TerribleTerry wrote:This is always a potential issue/problem when essentially the Hattons are promoting the event themselves - why would they want to eat into profit margins by putting on a competitive or extensive undercard?rhino222 wrote:the undercard is dire im afraid, and i have no anti FA bias, its just with the main event being such a 'headliner' i would have expected some world title level scraps on the undercard.
in fact id go as far as to say thats its possibly the worst vegas undercard i have ever seen. considering the pride of britain is in such a big fight, the supporting cast is headlined by his brother !!!
i know clinton withdrew and should have been on the bill, but that was at least 2 months ago, surely enough time to draft in a few quality fighters from another promoter. all in all a pile of garbage unfortunately...
I can see the reasoning from their point of view but as a paying customer I wouldn't be happy travelling to Vegas to see 'Magic' Matthew headlining the undercard!
for once i agree - there is probably not much meat left on the bone once the star draw has had a look.... probably explains Bobby Gunn, and Amir Khans opponents tho......boxingchat wrote:That is what happens when the fighter commands all the money!TerribleTerry wrote:This is always a potential issue/problem when essentially the Hattons are promoting the event themselves - why would they want to eat into profit margins by putting on a competitive or extensive undercard?rhino222 wrote:the undercard is dire im afraid, and i have no anti FA bias, its just with the main event being such a 'headliner' i would have expected some world title level scraps on the undercard.
in fact id go as far as to say thats its possibly the worst vegas undercard i have ever seen. considering the pride of britain is in such a big fight, the supporting cast is headlined by his brother !!!
i know clinton withdrew and should have been on the bill, but that was at least 2 months ago, surely enough time to draft in a few quality fighters from another promoter. all in all a pile of garbage unfortunately...
I can see the reasoning from their point of view but as a paying customer I wouldn't be happy travelling to Vegas to see 'Magic' Matthew headlining the undercard!
-
boxingchat
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1934
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 05:26
~ MIKEE ~ wrote:for once i agree - there is probably not much meat left on the bone once the star draw has had a look.... probably explains Bobby Gunn, and Amir Khans opponents tho......boxingchat wrote:That is what happens when the fighter commands all the money!TerribleTerry wrote: This is always a potential issue/problem when essentially the Hattons are promoting the event themselves - why would they want to eat into profit margins by putting on a competitive or extensive undercard?
I can see the reasoning from their point of view but as a paying customer I wouldn't be happy travelling to Vegas to see 'Magic' Matthew headlining the undercard!
Let's see if you lot slag this show off like you did Cardiff. What they would give for an undercard like Cardiff.
I bet the Thomas and Mack is less than half full. This fight is not the hot news they thought it was going to be.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45233
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
The undercard is one thing, but the main event is at least a good competitive fight. One is not a substitute for the other in my opinion.
I reckon you're probably right about the attendance, it's not easy to get Vegas crowds excited about fights, there aren't many full houses at shows in Vegas, and the atmosphere is often pretty much flat. I can remember people booing during Marquez v Pacman! I mean, come on, the geezer had been on the deck three times in the first round.
I reckon you're probably right about the attendance, it's not easy to get Vegas crowds excited about fights, there aren't many full houses at shows in Vegas, and the atmosphere is often pretty much flat. I can remember people booing during Marquez v Pacman! I mean, come on, the geezer had been on the deck three times in the first round.
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Ill spoil it for you then.... with the exception of Echols-Zuniga (Fulgencia not Fernando) and the dubious possibilty of M Hatton-Galvan.... the undercard for this is thin... I think the biggest gripe with the cardiff undercard from my perspective (and Macca and Khan were undercard not headline were they not?) was that the two big undercard fights were mismatched, (as was main event but hey ho), and what was televised was not all that could have been.... I will leave further comments for someone who was there, it may be that seeing it live is different...boxingchat wrote:~ MIKEE ~ wrote:for once i agree - there is probably not much meat left on the bone once the star draw has had a look.... probably explains Bobby Gunn, and Amir Khans opponents tho......boxingchat wrote: That is what happens when the fighter commands all the money!
Let's see if you lot slag this show off like you did Cardiff. What they would give for an undercard like Cardiff.
I bet the Thomas and Mack is less than half full. This fight is not the hot news they thought it was going to be.
I was at dagenham on 26th of jan, and enjoyed the whole thing, even the Magee-Lowe fight which was a bit technical to say the least... so maybe its different seeing the whole show live