Best Fight of all Time

I Feel Fine · Post by **I Feel Fine** » 28 Jun 2007, 01:40

This was something I wanted to get to after Hatton-Castillo but I guess I forgot.

Kellerman kept calling Corrales-Castillo the greatest fight of all time. Now, I think its a great fight, but I wouldn't give it that distinction. I wouldn't even call it the best fight of this decade, I prefer Morales-Barrera.

Anyway, does anyone agree with Kellerman that Corrales-Castillo is the greatest fight ever?

HomicideHenry · Post by **HomicideHenry** » 28 Jun 2007, 01:48

No...i dont agree with Kellerman on that...it is one of the better fights of the last decade or so, but ALL TIME is pushing it tremendously.

Someday will make a list of the best fights ever per division, in my own opinion. 8)

Senya13 · Post by **Senya13** » 28 Jun 2007, 03:04

Morales-Barrera I. Although it got one-sided at times, with Barrera getting too passive and just covering up under Morales' fire, and only waking up during the final 10 seconds of the round.

m1kee50 · Post by **m1kee50** » 28 Jun 2007, 13:15

Calzaghe-Lacy deffo one of the best recent fights... so was Thaxton-Meager...

as for all time? i dunno, the annoying thing is, in some fcuking bar or sports centre in the seventies, it probably happened in front of about 50 people, and we all missed it.... my vote goes for Gatti-Ward (the trilogy if i may)

markl · Post by **markl** » 28 Jun 2007, 14:28

No, it was great but I prefer a lot of fights over it.

With the greater skill involved Hearns/SRL 1 & Duran/Leonard 1 both trump it for me.

For sheer action I would trun to Chacon/Limon 4

Certainly great but I don't think it would be in my top 10.

dempseyfire · Post by **dempseyfire** » 28 Jun 2007, 14:45

Kellerman will just jump on something new and modern to ruffle people's feathers. Remember how Zab Judah was the best 140 of all time? Or Jones Jr beating Joe Frazier?

Castillo-Corrales was a great fight but there have been literally dozens of fights as good and better in boxing.

I do think out of fights in the past 10 years, for sheer entertainment nothing beats Ward-Gatti I. Morales-Barrera I comes mighty close as well.

I don't think Morales-Pacqueo I gets enough credit . . .that was the best fight of the past few years IMO.

As for recent HW fights, I would say Lamon Brewster takes the cake on those. Brewster-Klitschko, Brewster-Krasniqi, and Brewster-Lyakovich were all excellent and much better fights than the other titleholders were engaging in.

Senya13 · Post by **Senya13** » 28 Jun 2007, 15:12

I certainly do not think there are more than a few fights, of which the film is available, that were better then Corrales-Castillo I. Where both skill, almost non-stop entertainment and unpredictable result were involved. None of Gatti-Ward had enough skill involved to be as good. Hearns-SRL I was a boring match until the final few rounds.

mas430 · Post by **mas430** » 28 Jun 2007, 15:43

Azumah Nelson & Jeff Fenech the 1st match..........Fenech.who in my opinion was well & truly robbed ...........2nd fight ............??? the real fenech never turned up!

theone · Post by **theone** » 28 Jun 2007, 17:04

Foreman/Lyle for me. it may have been devoid of any technical boxing skill, but no fight was ever more exciting or entertaining.

Azumah Nelson & Jeff Fenech the 1st match..........Fenech.who in my opinion was well & truly robbed ...........2nd fight ............??? the real fenech never turned up!

Maybe the real Nelson didn't turn up for the first fight.

RazorKO · Post by **RazorKO** » 28 Jun 2007, 19:14

Arguello vs Pryor 1 - Its a shame this fight didnt win ring magazines fight of the year, I favour this fight over Chacon-Limon 4.

Coetzee-Weaver, Foreman-Lyle, Fletcher-Green, Hagler-Mugabi: Are all great fights brawl wise.

I Feel Fine · Post by **I Feel Fine** » 28 Jun 2007, 19:54

Thanks guys, it seems we're all in agreement that its not the best fight ever... I myself might go with Hagler-Hearns or something.

dempseyfire · Post by **dempseyfire** » 28 Jun 2007, 20:43

Decagon wrote:What's the worst Fight of the Year? My vote would go to Foreman-Young.

Hmm, perhaps . . .I think Tyson-Holyfield is a very over-rated FOTY . . .at least Foreman-Young was competetive.

HomicideHenry · Post by **HomicideHenry** » 29 Jun 2007, 00:07

Carnera-Baer makes Foreman-Lyle a walk in the park ffs 8)

generic screen name · Post by **generic screen name** » 29 Jun 2007, 02:06

Decagon wrote:What's the worst Fight of the Year? My vote would go to Foreman-Young.

Ali-Spinks. The fact that it was over Norton-Holmes that year was a disgrace.

walshb · Post by **walshb** » 29 Jun 2007, 08:35

~ MIKEE ~ wrote:Calzaghe-Lacy deffo one of the best recent fights... so was Thaxton-Meager...

as for all time? i dunno, the annoying thing is, in some fcuking bar or sports centre in the seventies, it probably happened in front of about 50 people, and we all missed it.... my vote goes for Gatti-Ward (the trilogy if i may)

A one sided whupping??

Ezzard · Post by **Ezzard** » 29 Jun 2007, 09:07

Sanchez-Nelson is a classic.

It has the changes in momentum. The confused great trying to work out the soon-to-be great. Then Sanchez works out Nelson and drops him. He uses the left hook to take over. BUT Nelson somehow manages to get another head of steam up. He amazingly comes back at Sanchez. Those left hooks finally take their toll and Azumah's right side of the jaw breaks and swells hideously. Sanchez finally gets his man.

It's rare that 2 greats fight both at their ideal weight.

dempseyfire · Post by **dempseyfire** » 29 Jun 2007, 09:36

Decagon wrote:Holyfield-Ruiz III was competitive. That doesn't make it a great fight. Foreman-Young was about as exciting.

Oh come on . . in the 7th round Young was a good punch away from being KO'd, and then he fights back to come on strong and knock Foreman down in the 12th. Ruiz-Holyfield had none of that drama.

I concur it wasn't FOTY material, esp. since the first 6 rounds were really slow with little happening, but it was a league ahead of any of the Ruiz-Holyfield fights, which were all uniformely awful.

Senya13 · Post by **Senya13** » 29 Jun 2007, 12:49

Terry D wrote:Nonsense. Barrera boxed well that night and belied his reputation as a one-dimensional fighter. Overall he set the secen for his greater psychological strength in that fight.

He was passive a LOT of time in that fight, allowing Morales to lead and just covering up and only very seldom waking up (usually in the final 10-15 seconds of the round). Overall it was a very clear win for Morales, who wasn't only more aggressive, but scored more clean punches and showed much superior ring generalship than Barrera.

elmersalsa · Post by **elmersalsa** » 01 Jul 2007, 14:46

I Feel Fine wrote:Thanks guys, it seems we're all in agreement that its not the best fight ever... I myself might go with Hagler-Hearns or something.

Or the "Thrilla in Manila"

But the best fight that I have ever seen was Leonard vs Hearns I. The other was Bazooka Limon vs Chacon IV...They do not make fights like this any more

As for Corrales vs Castillo I, I have not seen it yet, but the best fight of this decade for me was Trinidad vs Vargas...Exceptional clash!!!

Seamus · Post by **Seamus** » 01 Jul 2007, 19:20

Arnold Taylor vs Romeo Anaya

marchegiano007 · Post by **marchegiano007** » 02 Jul 2007, 06:00

1.- Dempsey vs Firpo 2.- Louis vs Conn 1st fight 3.- Zale vs Graciano 2nd fight 4.- Marciano vs Walcott 1st fight 5.- Aly vs Frazier 3rd fight 6.- Pryor vs Arguello 1st fight. 7.- Hagler vs Hearns 8.- Chavez vs Taylor. 9.- Corrales vs Castillo 1st fight. and 10.- Aly vs Frazier 1st fight it does not matter the who is first and last but no fight can be the greatest fight of all time.

'Rocket'Rigby · Post by **'Rocket'Rigby** » 02 Jul 2007, 11:45

Apart from the obvious favourites involving Ali and Louis.

I thought Ezzard Charles v Louis, Walcott and Marciano were great. But I have only seen limited rounds. But from what I have seen I have enjoyed and they had everything in them to qualify as great. (In my opion, anyway)

regards,

Rocket
______
Molon Labe!

markl · Post by **markl** » 02 Jul 2007, 17:03

Louis/Charles should not be mentioned. That was about as exciting as Ali/Holmes

dempseyfire · Post by **dempseyfire** » 02 Jul 2007, 17:09

markl wrote:Louis/Charles should not be mentioned. That was about as exciting as Ali/Holmes

It was fought at a much faster pace and was much more competetive than Ali-Holmes.

markl · Post by **markl** » 05 Jul 2007, 14:32

I certainly stretched it to make a point. But it was a noncompetitive fight that wouldn't rank on any top 500 greatest fights list.

Best Fight of all Time

Best Fight of all Time

TEN BEST FIGHTS OF ALL TIME