Saw Bob on FridayNight Fights and he looked great, never realised that Bob wanted to fight Spinks when he was in his late 40s, I thought Bob was older.
I think Spinks was a great Champion and was never beat by a light heavy, Bob was also great and in my mind still made the most title defences.
In their primes who would win ?
Bob always said that Spinks kept his head up and he would connect easily, IMO Bob would have beat Spinks maybe even stopping him.
What do you think ?
Ross
Bob Foster Vs Michael Spinks
-
dr_devious
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5348
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19
I'll go along with that, was thinking much the same thing Mr Decagon.Decagon wrote:Spinks by KO. Foster couldn't take a heavyweight punch, and Spinks had a heavyweight punch.
I can go along with that too Doc.dr_devious wrote:Foster would have been kayoed by Spinks if he had returned to fight him in his 40s. Peak for peak, I'm not sure, Spinks on points maybe?
best wishes
"T.M.K"
Obviously this would be a great matchup. Spinks probably had a better chin than anyone Foster ever fought at LHW, but Foster had greater one punch knockout power than anyone Spinks fought at LHW. In a war of attrition Spinks wins by decision and probably scores a knockdown late. On the other hand though, Spinks could be outboxed and despite their equal heights, Foster was much better at keeping his opponents on the outside. If he stays within his fight plan and refuses to fight in the trenches, Foster's jab and big right win a clear decision.